Skip to main content

The Evolution and Classification of Ocular Surface Transplantation

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thoft RA. Conjunctival transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95:1425–1427.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kruse FE, Chen JJ, Tsai RJ, et al. Conjunctival transdifferentiation is due to incomplete removal of limbal basal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31:1903–1913.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai RJ-F, Sun T-T, Tseng SCG. Comparison of limbal and conjunctival autograft transplantation in corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits. Ophthalmology 1990; 97:446–455.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thoft RA. Keratoepithelioplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turgeon PW, Nauheim RC, Roat MI, et al. Indications for keratoepithelioplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davanger M, Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure inrenewal of corneal epithelium. Nature 1971; 229:560–561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schermer S, Galvin S, Sun T-T. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol 1986; 103:49–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lathja LG. Stem cell concepts. Differentiation 1979; 14:23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kinoshita S, Friend J, Thoft RA. Biphasic cell proliferation in transdifferentiation of conjunctival to corneal epithelium in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24:1008–1014.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Potten CS, Loeffler M. Epidermal cell proliferation. I. Changes with time in the proportion of isolated, paired, and clustered labeled cells in sheets of murine epidermis. Virchows Arch [B] 1987; 53:286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Potten CS, Morris RJ. Epithelial stem cells in vivo. J Cell Sci 1988; 10(suppl):45–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfister RR. Corneal stem cell disease; concepts, categorization, and treatment by auto-and homotransplantation of limbal stem cells. CLAO J 1994; 20:64–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leblond CP. The life history of cells in renewing systems. Am J Anat 1981; 160:114–158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Potten CS. Epithelial proliferative subpopulations. Stem Cells and Tissue Homeostasis. Cambridge University Press, 1978, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cotsarelis G, Dong G, Sun T-T, et al. Differential response of limbal and corneal epithelial to phorbol myristate acetate (TPA). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28(suppl):1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ebato B, Friend J, Thoft RA. Comparison of limbal and peripheral human corneal epithelium in tissue culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29:1533–1537.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zieske JD. Perpetuation of stem cells in the eye. Eye 1994; 8:163–169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolega J, Manabe M, Sun T-T. Basement membrane heterogeneity and variation in corneal epithelial differentiation. Differentiation 1989; 42:54–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei ZG, Sun T-T, Lavker RM. Rabbit conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells belong to two separate lineages. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:523–533.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei ZG, Wu RL, Lavker RM, Sun T-T. In vitro growth and differentiation of rabbit bulbar, fornix, and palpebral conjunctival epithelia. Implications on conjunctival epithelial transdifferentiation and stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34:1814–1828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lavker RM, Wei ZG, Sun T-T. Phorbol ester preferentially stimulates mouse forniceal conjunctival and limbal epithelial cells to proliferate in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:301–307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kenyon KR, Tseng SCG. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1989; 96:709–723.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen JJ, Tseng SC. Corneal epithelial wound healing in partial limbal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31:1301–1314.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen JJ, Tseng SC. Abnormal corneal epithelial wound healing in partial thickness removal of limbal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:2219–2233.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai RJF, Tseng SCG. Human allograft limbal transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction. Cornea 1994; 13:389–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsubota K, Toda I, Saito H, et al. Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium by limbal allograft transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1995; 102:1486–1495.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holland EJ. Epithelial transplantation for the management of severe ocular surface disease. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996; 19:677–743.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Croasdale CR, Schwartz GS, Malling JV, Holland EJ. Keratolimbal allograft: recommendations for tissue procurement and preparation by eye banks, and standard surgical technique. Cornea 1999; 18:52–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwitko S, Raminho D, Barcaro S, et al. Allograft conjunctival transplantation for bilateral ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1995; 102:1020–1025.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kenyon KR, Rapoza PA. Limbal allograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1995; 102 (suppl):101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  31. De Rotth A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with fetal membrane. Arch Ophthalmol 1940; 23:522–525.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim JC, Tseng SCG. Transplantation of preserved human amniotic membrane for surface reconstruction in severely damaged rabbit corneas. Cornea 1995; 14:473–484.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsubota K, Satake Y, Ohyama M, et al. Surgical reconstriction of the ocular surface in advanced ocular cicatricial pemphigoid and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmology 1996; 122(1):38–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Gray T, Meller D. Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for corneal surface reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116:431–441.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwab IR, Isseroff RR. Bioengineered corneas—the promise and the challenge (ed). N Engl J Med 2000; 343:136–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, et al. Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet 1997; 349:990–993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindberg KL, Brown ME, Chaves HV, et al. In vitro propagation of human ocular surface epithelial cells for transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34:2672–2679.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsai RJ-F, Li L-M, Chen J-K. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:86–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwab IR, Reyes M, Isseroff RR. Successful transplantation of bioengineered tissue replacements in patients with ocular surface disease. Cornea 2000; 19(4):421–426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee SH, Tseng SCG. Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 3:303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwab IR. Cultured corneal epithelia for ocular surface disease. Tr Am Ophth Soc 1999 SCVII:891–986.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Holland EJ, Schwartz GS. Epithelial stem-cell transplantation for severe ocular surface disease, editorial. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(22):1752–1753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Djalilian AR, Bagheri MM, Schwartz GS, et al. Keratolimbal allograft for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency. Presented at Scientific Program at Castroviejo Cornea Society, Orlando, FL, October 23, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rao SK, Rajagopal R, Sitalakshmi G, Padmanabhan P. Limbal allografting from related live donors for corneal surface reconstruction. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(4):822–828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Daya SM, Living-related conjunctivo-limbal allograft (lr-CLAL) for the treatment of stem cell deficiency: an analysis of long-term outcome. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(10) suppl, p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vastine DW, Stewart WB, Schwab IR. Reconstruction of the periocular mucous membrane by autologous conjunctival transplantation. Ophthalmology 1982; 89:1072–1081.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ronk JF, Ruiz-Esmenjaud S, Osorio M, et al. Limbal conjunctival autograft in a subacute alkaline corneal burn. Cornea 1994; 13:465–468.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jenkins C, Tuft S, Liu C, et al. Limbal transplantation in the management of chronic contact-lens-associated epitheliopathy. Eye 1993; 7:629–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Turgeon PW, Nauheim RC, Roat MI, et al. Indications for keratoepithelioplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:233–236.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Holland EJ, Schwartz GS. The evolution of epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disease and a proposed classification system. Cornea 1996; 15(6):549–556.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holland, E.J., Schwartz, G.S. (2002). The Evolution and Classification of Ocular Surface Transplantation. In: Ocular Surface Disease Medical and Surgical Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21570-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21570-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95161-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21570-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics