This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Bauermeister, M. (1964). The effect of body tilt on apparent verticality, apparent body position, and their relation. Journal of experimental psychology, 67, 142–147.
Blatt, S. J. (1990). The Rorschach: A test of perception or an evaluation of representation. Journal of personality assessment, 55, 394–416.
Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Bunge, M. (1969). Metaphysics, Epistemology and Methodology of Levels. In L. L. Whyte, A. G. Wilson, & D. Wilson(eds). Hierarchical structures (pp. 17–28). New York: Elsevier.
Cassirer, E. (1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms. Vol. 1. Language. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. (S. K. Langer, trans.). New York: Harpers.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind. London: Sage.
Exner, J. E. (1986). The Rorschach (2nd ed., Vol. 1). NY: Wiley.
Exner, J. E., Armbruster, G. L. & Mittman, B. (1978). The Rorschach response process. Journal of Personality Assessment,42, 27–38.
Feibleman, J. K. (1954). Theory of integrative levels. British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, 5, 59–66.
Friedman, H. (1953). Perceptual regression in schizophrenia. Journal of projective techniques, 17, 171–185.
Gold, J. M. (1987). The role of verbalization in the Rorschach response process: a review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 489–505.
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art. (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (first published 1968)
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Goodman, N. & Elgin, C. Z. (1988). Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts and sciences. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Harris, J. G. (1960). Validity: The search for a constant in a universe of variables. In M. A. Rickers-Ovsiankina (Ed.), Rorschach psychology (pp. 380–439). NY: Wiley.
Hemmindinger, L. (1953). Perceptual organization and development as reflected in the structure of Rorschach test responses. Journal of projective techniques, 17, 162–170.
Hemmendinger, L. (1960). Developmental theory and the Rorschach method. In M. A. Rickers-Ovsiankina (Ed)., Rorschach psychology (pp. 58–79). NY: Wiley.
Henle, P. (1958). Metaphor. In P. Henle (Ed.), Language, thought, and culture (pp. 173–195). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Hesse, M. (1988). The cognitive claims of metaphor. The journal of speculative philosophy, 2, 1–16.
Holtzman, W. H. (1961). Inkblot perception and personality. Austin: Hogg Foundation, University of Texas.
Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. NY: Wiley.
Kaden, S. E., Wapner, S., and Werner, H. (1955). Studies in physiognomic perception: II. Effect of directional dynamics of pictured objects and of words on the position of the apparent horizon. Journal of psychology, 39, 61–70.
Kaplan, B. (1962). Radical metaphor, aesthetic and the origin of language. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 2, 75–84.
Kaplan, B. (1967). Meditations on genesis. Human development, 10, 65–87.
Langer, S. K. (1942). Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form. New York: Scribner.
Leichtman, M. (1996). The Rorschach: A developmental perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Lindzey, G. (1961). Projective techniques and cross cultural research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McCormick, P. J. (1996). Starmaking: Realism, anti-realism, and irrealism. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Phillips, L. & Smith, J. G. (1953). Rorschach interpretation: Advanced technique.NY: Grune & Stratton.
Piotrowski, Z. A. (1957). Perceptanalysis. New York: MacMillan.
Rapaport, D. (1951). Organization and pathology of thought: selected sources. New York: Columbia University.
Rapaport, D., Gill, M. & Schafer, R. (1946). Diagnostic psychological testing (Vol. 2). Chicago: Yearbook.
Schachtel, E. (1945). Experientialfoundations of Rorschach’s test. New York: Basic Books.
Schneirla, T. C. (1949). Levels in the psychological capacities of animals. In R. W. Sellars, V. J. McGill, & M. Farber (Eds.), Philosophyfor the future (pp. 243–286). New York: Macmillan.
Sonesson, G. (1996). An essay concerning images: From rhetoric to semiotics. Semiotica, 109-1/2, 41–140.
Sonesson, G. (2001). Iconicity strikes back: the third generation-or why Eco still is wrong. Plenary speech at the Sixth Congress of the International Association for Visual Semiotics, Quebec City, Quebec, October 14–21, 2001. Retrieved December 18, 2002 from http://www.arthist.lu.se/kultsem/sonesson/ CVgs.html
Wapner, S., Werner, H., & Chandler, K. (1951). Experiments on sensori-tonic field theory of perception: I. Effects of extraneous stimulation on the visual perception of verticality. Journal of experimental psychology, 42, 341–345.
Werner, H. (1945).Perceptual behavior of brain-injured, mentally defective children: an experimental study by means of the Rorschach technique. Genetic psychology monographs, 31, 51–110.
Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development.NY: Science Editions.
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development. Minneapolis, Mn: University of Minnesota Press.
Werner, H. and Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbolformation: An organismic developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. NY: Wiley.
Werner, H. & Wapner, S. (1954). Studies in physiognomic perception: I. Effectof configurational dynamics and meaning-induced sets on the position of the apparent median plane. Journal of psychology, 38, 51–65.
Werner, H. & Wapner, S. (1949). Sensory-tonic field theory of perception. Journal ofpersonality, 18, 88–107.
Werner, H. & Wapner, S. (1952). Toward a general theory of perception. Psychological review, 59, 324–338.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cirillo, L. (2005). Metaphor and Perception. In: Valsiner, J. (eds) Heinz Werner and Developmental Science. Path in Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48677-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48677-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47909-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48677-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)