Skip to main content

Measuring Resilience in Children

From Theory to Practice

  • Chapter

Abstract

We begin this chapter with the recognition that concepts and their defining constructs in clinical psychology must contain certain characteristics in order to be subjected to experimental testing and applied to benefit our constituency. The study of any topic, in this case resilience, requires that we define the construct, devise a way to measure it, and demonstrate if, how, when, and where it can be useful. Constructs have to be sufficiently defined so as to be operationalized in a way that is reliable across time, subjects, and researchers. Once a concept is operationalized in a reliable manner, then its validity can be examined. Finally, when we have sufficiently operationalized a concept and there is evidence that it can be measured in a reliable and valid way, then application in clinical and educational settings is reasonable.

Keywords

  • Protective Factor
  • True Score
  • Daily Hassle
  • Major Life Event
  • Psychometric Quality

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1997). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, L. A. (1981). The source of stress inventory. Psychology in the Schools, 18(2), 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress management: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1–37.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2002a). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2002b). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Technical Manual. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment—Clinical Form. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin, (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp.). jNew York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., LeBuffe, P. A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1994). Devereux Scales of Mental Disorders. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System Interpretive Handbook. Itasca: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2002). Practical implications of general intelligence and PASS cognitive processes. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 855–884). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied psychometrics. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Parker, G. R., & Wyman, P. A. (1990). Stress resilient children in an urban setting. Journal of Primary Prevention, 11(1), 3–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naglieri, J.A., LeBuffe, P.A. (2005). Measuring Resilience in Children. In: Goldstein, S., Brooks, R.B. (eds) Handbook of Resilience in Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48572-9_8

Download citation