Measuring Resilience in Children

From Theory to Practice
  • Jack A. Naglieri
  • Paul A. LeBuffe


We begin this chapter with the recognition that concepts and their defining constructs in clinical psychology must contain certain characteristics in order to be subjected to experimental testing and applied to benefit our constituency. The study of any topic, in this case resilience, requires that we define the construct, devise a way to measure it, and demonstrate if, how, when, and where it can be useful. Constructs have to be sufficiently defined so as to be operationalized in a way that is reliable across time, subjects, and researchers. Once a concept is operationalized in a reliable manner, then its validity can be examined. Finally, when we have sufficiently operationalized a concept and there is evidence that it can be measured in a reliable and valid way, then application in clinical and educational settings is reasonable.


Protective Factor True Score Daily Hassle Major Life Event Psychometric Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1997). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  4. Chandler, L. A. (1981). The source of stress inventory. Psychology in the Schools, 18(2), 164–168.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress management: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2002a). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  9. LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2002b). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Technical Manual. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  10. LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment—Clinical Form. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.Google Scholar
  11. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Masten, A., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin, (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp.). jNew York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Naglieri, J. A., LeBuffe, P. A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1994). Devereux Scales of Mental Disorders. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System Interpretive Handbook. Itasca: Riverside.Google Scholar
  15. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2002). Practical implications of general intelligence and PASS cognitive processes. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 855–884). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied psychometrics. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Parker, G. R., & Wyman, P. A. (1990). Stress resilient children in an urban setting. Journal of Primary Prevention, 11(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack A. Naglieri
    • 1
  • Paul A. LeBuffe
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfax
  2. 2.Institute of Clinical Training and ResearchThe Devereux FoundationVillanova

Personalised recommendations