Summary
Pharmacokinetic models of anticancer compounds are growing in prevalence, and these provide implicitly useful guidance in drug dosing. With the construction of pharmacodynamic models of unperturbed, and treated, tumor growth, as well as toxicity, it becomes possible to explicitly employ PK/PD models to design cancer treatment schedules. This work has demonstrated how current modeling tools and insight can be integrated to develop mathematical descriptions of drug kinetics (PK) and effect (PD) that are quantitatively accurate while having a structure that is amenable to model-based optimization. The present study was preclinical in nature, using human tumor xenografts, and the concept is generalizable for use in human patients with a modest increase in treatment-related measurements. A long-term goal of this work is to develop inter-species scaling factors to allow preclinical results, such as those in the present study, to be generally applicable in a priori dosage design for clinical treatment. Finally, based on the premise that model quality limits achievable performance [4], the development of measurement techniques or devices to sample at finer spatial and temporal resolutions could lead to more detailed PK and PD models and hence improved dosage design algorithms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures: 2003. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2003PWSacured.pdf. 2003.
R. Simon. Clinical Trials in Cancer, Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 6th edition, pp 521–538, 2001.
B.A. Ogunnaike, R.K. Pearson, N. Samardzija, and J.D. Bomberger. Low order emprical modeling for nonlinear systems. In IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, pp. 41–46, Kyoto, Japan, 1994.
M. Morari and E. Zafiriou. Robust Process Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
S. Skogestad and M. Morari. Understanding the dynamic behavior of distillation columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27:1848–1862 (1988).
Q. Zheng and E. Zafiriou. Control-relevant identification of Volterra series models. In Proc. American Control Conf., pp. 2050–2054, Baltimore, MD, 1994.
L.J. Laura and W.C. Zamboni. Cellular, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic aspects of response to camptothecins: can we improve it? Drug Resistance Updates 4:273–288 (2001).
National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1996.
M.N. Kirstein, P.J. Houghton, P.J. Cheshire, L.B. Richmond, A.K. Smith, S.K. Hanna, and C.F. Stewart. Relation between 9-aminocamptothecin systemic exposure and tumor response in human solid tumor xenografts. Clinical Cancer Research 7:358–366 (2001).
J.G. Supko and L. Malspeis. Liquid chromatographic analysis of 9-aminocamptothecin in plasma monitored by fluorescence induced upon postcolumn acidification. J. Liquid Chromatography 15:3261–3283 (1992).
D.Z. D’Argenio and A. Schumitzky. ADAPT II Users Guide: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis Software. Biomedical Simulations Resource, Los Angeles, 1997.
S. Skogestad. Dynamics and control of distillation columns: A tutorial introduction. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 75:539–562 (1997).
Ž. Bajzer, M. Marušić and S. Vuk-Pavlović Conceptual frameworks for mathematical modeling of tumor growth dynamics. Math. Comput. Model. 23:31–46 (1996).
R. Martin and K.L. Teo. Optimal Control of Drug Administration in Cancer Chemotherapy. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1994.
A. Asachenkov, G. Marchuk, R. Mohler, and S. Zuev. Disease Dynamics. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1994.
R.B. Martin. Optimal control drug scheduling of cancer chemotherapy. Automatica 28:1113–1123 (1992).
A. Akaike. A basian extension of the minimal AIC procedures of autoregressive model fitting. Biometrika 66:237 (1979).
F.S. Clinton and M.J. Ratain. Chemotherapy: Topoisomerase Interactive Agents, In: Cancer Principles & Practice of Oncology. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 289–306.
D. Barbolosi and A. Iliadis. Optimizing drug regimens in cancer chemotherapy: a simulation study using a PK-PD model. Computers in Biology and Medicine 31:157–172 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Parker, R.S. et al. (2004). Toward Model-Based Chemotherapy Treatment Design. In: D’Argenio, D.Z. (eds) Advanced Methods of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis Volume 3. The International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 765. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48523-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48523-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7804-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48523-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive