Skip to main content

An Outline of What Computational Chemistry is All About

  • Chapter
Computational Chemistry
  • 1202 Accesses

Summary of Chapter 1

Computational chemistry allows one to calculate molecular geometries, reactivities, spectra, and other properties. It employs:

  • Molecular mechanics — based on a ball-and-springs model of molecules;

  • Ab initio methods — based on approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation without appeal to fitting to experiment;

  • Semiempirical methods — based on approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation with appeal to fitting to experiment (i.e. using parameterization);

  • DFT methods — based on approximate solutions of the Schrödinger equation, bypassing the wavefunction that is a central feature of ab initio and semiempirical methods;

  • Molecular dynamics methods study molecules in motion.

Ab initio and the faster DFT enable novel molecules of theoretical interest to be studied, provided they are not too big. Semiempirical methods, which are much faster than ab initio or even DFT, can be applied to fairly large molecules (e.g. cholesterol, C27H46O, while MM will calculate geometries and energies of very large molecules such as proteins and nucleic acids; however, MM does not give information on electronic properties. Computational chemistry is widely used in the pharmaceutical industry to explore the interactions of potential drugs with biomolecules, for example by docking a candidate drug into the active site of an enzyme. It is also used to investigate the properties of solids (e.g. plastics) in materials science.

Knowledge is experimenťs daughter Leonardo da Vinci, in Pensieri, ca. 1492 Nevertheless:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The physical chemist Wilhelm Ostwald (Nobel Prize 1909) was a disciple of the philosopher Ernst Mach. Like Mach, Ostwald attacked the notion of the reality of atoms and molecules (“Nobel Laureates in Chemistry, 1901–1992,” L. K. James, Ed., American Chemical Society and the Chemical Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC, 1993) and it was only the work of Jean Perrin, published in 1913, that finally convinced him, perhaps the last eminent holdout against the atomic theory, that these entities really existed (Perrin showed that the number of tiny particles suspended in water dropped off with height exactly as predicted in 1905 by Einstein, who had derived an equation assuming the existence of atoms). Ostwalďs philosophical outlook stands in contrast to that of another outstanding physical chemist, Johannes van der Waals, who staunchly defended the atomic/molecular theory and was outraged by the Machian positivism of people like Ostwald. See “Van der Waals and Molecular Science,” A. Ya. Kipnis, B. F. Yavelov and J. S. Powlinson, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. For the opposition to and acceptance of atoms in physics see: D. Lindley, “Boltzmann’s Atom. The Great Debatethat Launcheda Revolution in Physics,” Free Press, New York, 2001; C. Cercignani, “Ludwig Boltzmann: The Man who Trusted Atoms,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1998. Of course, to anyone who knew anything about organic chemistry, the existence of atoms was in little doubt by 1910, since that science had by that time achieved significant success in the field of synthesis, and arational synthesis is predicated on assembling atoms in a definite way.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For accounts of the history of the development of structural formulas see M. J. Nye, “From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry,” University of California Press, 1993; C. A. Russell, “Edward Frankland: Chemistry, Controversy and Conspiracy in Victorian England,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. An assertion of the some adherents of the “postmodernist” school of social studies; see P. Gross and N. Levitt, “The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science,” John Hopkins University Press, 1994. (b) For an account of the exposure of the intellectual vacuity of some members of this school by physicist Alan Sokaľs hoax see M. Gardner, “Skeptical Inquirer,” 1996, 20(6), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A trendy word popularized by the late Thomas Kuhnin his bookz “The Structure of ScientificRevolutions,” University of Chicago Press, 1970. For a trenchant comment on Kuhn, see Ref. [3b]. (b) For a kinder perspective on Kuhn, see S. Weinberg, “Facing Up,” Harvard University Press, 2001, chapter 17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2004). An Outline of What Computational Chemistry is All About. In: Computational Chemistry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48391-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48391-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7285-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48391-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics