Skip to main content

Structure and Heuristic: In Praise of Structural Reallism in the Case of Niels Bohr

  • Chapter
The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook ((VCIY,volume 10))

  • 334 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Niels Bohr (1912): “The Rutherford Memorandum”, in: Niels Bohr: Collected Works, Léon Rosenfeld, General Editor, Volume 2, Work on Atomic Physics (1912–1917), Ulrich Hoyer, Editor, (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1981, 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr (1913): “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules”, Papers of 1913 reprinted from the Philosophical Magazine with an Introduction by Léon Rosenfeld, (Munksgaard Ltd., Copenhagen, W.A. Benjamin, New York), 1963. Reprinted further in: Niels Bohr: Collected Works, Léon Rosenfeld, General Editor, Volume 2, Work on Atomic Physics (1912–1917), Ulrich Hoyer, Editor, (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1981, 159–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr (1927): “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory”, in: Bohr (1934), 52–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr (1929a): “Introductory Survey”, in: Bohr (1934), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr (1929b): “The Atomic Theory and the Fundamental Principles underlying the Description of Nature”, in: Bohr (1934), 102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr (1934): Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Four Essays with an Introductory Survey, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr (1972): Niels Bohr: Collected Works, Léon Rosenfeld, General Editor, Volume 1, Early Work (1905–1911), J. Rud Nielsen, Editor, (North-Holland, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Favrholdt (1994): “Niels Bohr and Realism”, in: Faye, Folse (eds.) (1994), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan Faye (1990): Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan Faye and Henry J. Folse (1994) (eds.): Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, (Kluwer, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • John L. Heilbron, Thomas S. Kuhn (1969): “The Genesis of the Bohr Atom”, in: Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, Volume 1, (Philadelphia), 211–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich Hoyer (1981): “Introduction to Part II: Constitution of Atoms and Molecules”, in: Niels Bohr: Collected Works, Léon Rosenfeld, General Editor, Volume 2, Work on Atomic Physics (1912–1917), Ulrich Hoyer, Editor, (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Jammer (1966): The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, (Tomash Publishers, American Institute of Physics), 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugald Murdoch (1987): Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henri Poincaré (1913): The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and Method, (The New Science Press, New York), 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stathis Psillos (1999): Scientific Realism. How science tracks truth, (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • John S. Rigden (2001): “The quantization of the atom in three acts”, in: Annalen der Physik, Volume 10, Number 1–2, (Wiley-VCH, Berlin), 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhard Scheibe (1973): The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics, (Pergamon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold Sommerfeld (1916): “Zur Quantentheorie der Spektrallinien”, in: Annalen der Physik, Volume 51, 1–94, 125–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John Worrall (1989): “Structural Realism. The Best of Both Worlds?”, in: David Papineau (ed.): The Philosophy of Science, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 1996, 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elie G. Zahar (1994): “Poincaré’s Structural Realism and his Logic of Discovery”, in: Jean-Louis Greffe, Gerhard Heinzmann, Kuno Lorenz (eds.): Henri Poincaré. Science and Philosophy, (Akademie Verlag, Berlin und Albert Blanchard, Paris), 1996, 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engler, F. (2003). Structure and Heuristic: In Praise of Structural Reallism in the Case of Niels Bohr. In: Stadler, F. (eds) The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48214-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48214-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1269-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48214-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics