The Contexts of Scientific Justification. Some Reflections on the Relation Between Epistemological Contextualism and Philosophy of Science

  • Jutta Schickore
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 10)


Justification Procedure Knowledge Claim Epistemic Justification Relevant Alternative Receive View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alston, W. 1989, Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology, in: Epistemic Justification, Alston, W. (Ed.), Ithaca, 185–226.Google Scholar
  2. Annis, D. 1978, A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification, in: American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3): 213–219.Google Scholar
  3. Burian, R.M. 1977, More Than a Marriage of Convenience: On the Inextricability of History and Philosophy of Science, in: Philosophy of Science 44: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheyne, C. 1997, Epistemic Value and Fortuitous Truth, in: Principia 1 (109–134).Google Scholar
  5. De Rose, K. 1999, Contextualism, in: Blackwell’s Guide to Epistemology, Sosa, E. and J. Greco, Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Dretske, F.I. 1970, Epistemic Operators, in: The Journal of Philosophy 67(24): 1007–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dretske, F.I. 1972, Contrastive Statements, in: The Philosophical Review: 411–437.Google Scholar
  8. Dretske, F.I. 1981, The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge, in: Philosophical Studies 40: 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Echeverrìa, J. 1995, The Four Contexts of Scientific Activity, in: Theories and Modelsin Scientific Processes, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities, vol. 44, Herfel, W.E. et al. (Eds.), Amsterdam: Rodopi, 151–167.Google Scholar
  10. Engel Jr, M. 2000, Internalism, the Gettier Problem, and Meta-epistemological Skepticism, in: Grazer Philosophische Studien 60: 99–117.Google Scholar
  11. Feigl, H. 1970, The ‘Orthodox View’ of Theories: Remarks in Defense as Well as Critique, in: Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. IV, Radner, M. and S. Winokur (Eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Feyerabend, P. 1978, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Fogelin, R. 1994, Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gettier, E. 1963, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?, in: Analysis 23: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grundmann, T. 2001, Erkenntnistheorie. Positionen zwischen Tradition und Gegenwart, Paderborn: mentis.Google Scholar
  16. Hacking, I. 1999, Historical Meta-Epistemology, in: Wahrheit und Geschichte, Carl, W. and L. Daston (Eds.), Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 53–77.Google Scholar
  17. Hanson, N. R. 1965, Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Harlan, D. 1989, Intellectual History and the Return of Literature, in: The American Historical Review 94 (3): 581–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hetherington, S. 2001, A Fallibilist and Wholly Internalist Solution to the Gettier Problem, in: Journal of Philosophical Research 26: 307–324.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, T. S. 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lakatos, I. 1970, Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (Eds.), London: Cambridge University Press, 91–195.Google Scholar
  22. Lakatos, I. 1974, History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions, in: The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, Elkana, Y. (ed.), Atlantic Highlands, NY: Humanities Press, 195–241.Google Scholar
  23. Laudan, L. 1984, Science and Values. The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Laudan, L. 1996, Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  25. Leplin, J. 1987, The Bearing of Discovery on Justification, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4): 805–814.Google Scholar
  26. Longino, H. E. 1999, Feminist Epistemology, in: The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Greco, J. and E. Sosa (Eds.), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 327–353.Google Scholar
  27. McMullin, E. 1970, The History and Philosophy of Science: A Taxonomy, in: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, Stuewer, R. H. (ed.), New York et al.: Gordon and Breach, 12–67.Google Scholar
  28. Nickles, T. 1980, Introductory Essay: Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science, in: Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, Nickles, T. (Ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peursen, C.A.v. 1989, Discovery as the Context of any Scientific Justification, in: Man and World 22: 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polanyi, M. 1966, The Tacit Dimension, New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
  31. Sanford, D.H. 1981, Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives: Comments on Dretske, in: Philosophical Studies 40: 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shapere, D. 1977, What Can the Theory of Knowledge Learn From the History of Knowledge?, in: The Monist 60: 488–508.Google Scholar
  33. Shapere, D. 1980, The Character of Scientific Change, in: Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, vol. I, Nickles, T. (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 61–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegel, H. 1980, Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology, in: Philosophy of Science 47: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sosa, E. 1988, Knowledge in Context, Skepticism in Doubt. The Virtue of our Faculties, in: Philosophical Perspectives 2 (Epistemology): 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spohn, W. 2001, Vier Begründungsbegriffe,in: Erkenntnistheorie. Positionen zwischen Tradition und Gegenwart, Grundmann, T. (ed.), Paderborn: mentis, 33–52.Google Scholar
  37. Stalnaker, R.C. 1999, Context and Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suppe, F. (ed.) 1977, The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2., Urbana, Chicago und London.Google Scholar
  39. Taschek, W.W. 1998, On Ascribing Beliefs: Content in Context, in: The Journal of Philosophy 95 (7): 323–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willaschek, M. 2000, Wissen, Zweifel, Kontext. Eine kontextualistische Zurückweisung des Skeptizismus, in: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 54 (2): 151–172.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, M. 1988, Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, in: Mind 97 (387): 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams, M. 1991, Unnatural Doubts. Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, M. 1999, Skepticism, in: The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Greco, J. and E. Sosa (Eds.), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 35–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jutta Schickore
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Cambridge Free School LaneCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations