Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Basic Technical Readings

  1. Amemiya, T. (1985), Advanced Econometrics, Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press, [Chapter 9].Google Scholar
  2. Cattin, P., A. E. Gelfand and J. Danes (1983), “A Simple Bayesian Procedure for Estimation in a Conjoint Model,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (February), 29–35.Google Scholar
  3. Green, P. E. and V. R. Rao (1971), “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August), 355–363.Google Scholar
  4. Louviere, J. J. (1988), “Conjoint Analysis Modeling of Stated Preferences,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 1 (January), 93–119.Google Scholar
  5. McKelvey, R. D. and W. Zavoina (1975), “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Application Readings

  1. Beggs, S., S. Cardell and J. Hausman (1981), “Assessing The Potential Demand for Electric Cars,” Journal of Econometrics, 16, 1–19.Google Scholar
  2. Bowman, D. and H. Gatignon (1995), “Determinants of Competitor Response Time to a New Product Introduction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 1 (February), 42–53.Google Scholar
  3. Bunch, D. S. and R. Smiley (1992), “Who Deters Entry? Evidence on the Use of Strategic Entry Deterrents,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 3 (August), 509–521.Google Scholar
  4. Chu, W. and E. Anderson (1992), “Capturing Ordinal Properties of Categorical Dependent Variables: A Review with Applications to Modes of Foreign Entry and Choice of Industrial Sales Force,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, P. E. (1984), “Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (May), 155–169.Google Scholar
  6. Green, P. E. and V. Srinivasan (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (September), 103–123.Google Scholar
  7. Green, P. E. and V. Srinivasan (1990), “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments With Applications for Research and Practice,” Journal of Marketing, October, 3–19.Google Scholar
  8. Green, P. E. and Y. Wind (1975), “A New Way to Measure Consumers’ Judgements,” Harvard Business Review, July–August, 107–117.Google Scholar
  9. Green, P. E., A. M. Krieger and M. K. Agarwal (1991), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis: Some Caveats and Suggestions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28, May, 215–222.Google Scholar
  10. Jain, D. C., E. Muller, et al. (1999), “Pricing Patterns of Cellular Phones and Phonecalls: A Segment-Level Analysis,” Management Science 45, 2 (February), 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mahajan, V., P. E. Green and S. M. Goldberg (1982), “A Conjoint Model for Measuring Self-and Cross-Price/Demand Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (August), 334–342.Google Scholar
  12. Page, A. L. and H. F. Rosenbaum (1987), “Redesigning Product Lines with Conjoint Analysis: How Sunbeam Does it,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Priem, R. L. (1992), “An Application of Metric Conjoint Analysis for the Evaluation of Top Managers’ Individual Strategic Decision Making Processes: A Research Note,” Strategic Management Journal, 13, 143–151.Google Scholar
  14. Rangaswami, A. and G. R. Shell (1997), “Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negociations: Toward an “Electronic Bargaining Table”,” Management Science 43, 8 (August), 1147–1163.Google Scholar
  15. Srinivasan, V. and C. S. Park (1997), “Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 2 (May), 286–291.Google Scholar
  16. Wind, J., P. E. Green, D. Shifflet and M. Scarbrough (1989), “Courtyard by Marriott: Designing a Hotel Facility with Consumer-Based Marketing Models” Interfaces, 19 (January–February), 25–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Personalised recommendations