Skip to main content

The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about Individual Behaviour but next to Nothing about Demand

  • Chapter
Society, Behaviour, and Climate Change Mitigation

Part of the book series: Advances in Global Change Research ((AGLO,volume 8))

5. Conclusions

Our intention in the paper has been to explore a new approach to the science of energy demand: one which adequately accounts for the actors, institutions and networks which contribute to change; which re-envisions the object of inquiry as the services which energy provides; and which is equipped to understand change. This new approach would not obviate the individual, nor research intended to track changes in how individual consumers think and act; it would, however, recast demand as the result of interactions in the social, cultural and technical contexts in which individual lives are played out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. References

  • Boardman, Brenda, 1991: Fuel poverty: from cold homes to affordable warmth. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, Wiebe, 1992: The social construction of fluorescent lighting, or how an artifact was invented in its diffusion stage. pp. 75–102 in W. Bijker and J. Law (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, Wiebe, 1995: Of Bicycles, bakelite and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change: Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateau, B. and B. Lapillonne (eds.), 1982: Energy Demand: Facts and Trends. Springer-Verlag: Vienna and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. Schwartz, 1985: How the refrigerator got its hum in Mackenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology, Open University Press: Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebon, P., 1992: Twixst cup and lip: organizational behaviour, technical prediction and conservation practice. Energy Policy 20: pp. 802–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., 1998: Air Conditioning America: Engineers and the Controlled Environment. The John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, F., 1955: Energy and Society: The Relation Between Energy, Social Change and Economic Development, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, James., Nancy Miller, Paul Craig, Bruce Hackett, and Thomas Dietz et al. 1985: Social and engineering determinants and their equity implications in residential electricity use. Energy 10,12: pp. 1283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Yong, R., 1996: Some Psychological Aspects of Reduced Consumption Behaviour: The Role of Intrinsic Satisfaction and Motivation. Environment and Behaviour 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Richard C., 1984: Energy use among the low-income elderly: A closer look. Proceedings, 1984 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, pp. F–52–F–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, B., 1996: Scripts for the Future, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don., Eugen Rosa and Joye Dillman, 1983: Lifestyle and home energy conservation in the U.S. Journal of Economic Psychology 3: pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECU, 1996: Workshop on Modelling Energy Behaviour, Environmental Change Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R., 1997: Paper or Plastic? Energy, Environment and Consumerism in Sweden and America. Praeger: Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ester, Peter, 1985: Consumer Behaviour and Energy Conservation. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ger, G., H. Wilhite, B. Halkier, J. Lessøe, M. Godskesen, and I. Ropke, 1999: Symbolic Meanings of High and Low Impact Consumption in Different Cultures, in Shove, E., ed., Consumption, Everyday Life andSustainability. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. and E. Leopold, 1993: The World of Consumption, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forty, A., 1986: Objects of Desire: Design and Society Since 1750, London, Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, Bruce and Loren Lutzehiser, 1991: Social Structures and Economic Conduct: Interpreting Variations in Household Energy Consumption Sociological Forum 6: pp. 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner, Robert W., 1983: The problem of preference: Economic and Ritual Change in Highlands Java. Man 18(4): pp. 669–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille, John, 1997: Sustainable Norway. Lokal Agenda 21, Idehefte. Idebanken: Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA., 1995: Introduction of Cultural and Institutional Factors into Modelling Energy. Geneva: International Academy of the Environment, Event Report E44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, Naila, 1994: Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. W. Norton & Company: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett, 1986: Two Theories of Home Heat Control. Cognitive Science 10: 75–90. Reprinted and expanded 1987 in Cultural Models in Language and Thought, D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds.), Cambridge University Press. Also appeared, abridged, in Morrison and Kempton (eds.), 1984 (see below).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett and Laura Montgomery, 1982: Folk Quantification of Energy. Energy–The International Journal 7(10): pp. 817–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, Brian, 1999: Silicon Valley: Living the Managed Life. International Herald Tribune, Paris, 6. October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, Amory, 1992: Energy Efficient Buildings: Barriers and Opportunities. Boulder, CO: E-Source.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, P., 1997: Evaluation of the Swedish programme for energy efficiency — successful examples of market transformation through technology procurement. Proceedings of the 1999 ECEEE Summer Study. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, Loren, 1992: A Cultural Model of Household Energy Consumption. Energy-The International Journal 17: pp. 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, Loren and Bruce Hackett, 1993: Social Stratification and Environmental Degradation: Understanding Household CO2 Production. Social Problems 40: pp. 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, Loren and Elizabeth Shove, 1999: Coordinated Contractors and Contracting Knowledge: The Organizational Limits to Interdisciplinary Energy Efficiency Research and Development in the U.S. and U.K. Energy Policy 27: pp. 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Stanley, 1969: Comments: Participant-Observation and the Collection of Data, Vol. 4 of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1966–68: 341–49. Reidel Publishing Co.: Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Bonnie M. and B. Long, 1979: Energy and Families: The Crisis and the Response. Journal of Home Economics 70(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Bonnie M. and Willett Kempton (eds.), 1984: Families and Energy: Coping with Uncertainty. Conference Proceedings. Institute for Family and Child Study, College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University: East Langsing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Denton, 1978: Equity impacts of some major energy alternatives In Energy Policy in the United States: Social and Behavioural Dimensions ed. S. Warkov New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Dorothy and Dawn Day, 1975: The American Consumer: A Report to the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otnes, Per, 1988: Housing consumption: Collective systems service, in Per Otnes (ed.,) The Sociology of Consumption: An anthology. Solum: Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Eugene, Gary Machlis, and Ken Keating, 1988: Energy. Annual Review of Sociology. 14: pp. 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, Lee, 1991: Quoted in Cherfas, J. Skeptics and visionaries examine energy savings. Science 251: pp. 154–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, Lee, S. Bartlett, D. Hawk, E. Vine, 1989: Linking lifestyles to energy use: a matter of time? Annual Review of Energy 14: pp. 273–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, Juliet, 1999: The Overspent American: Upscaling, Downshifting, and the New Consumer. Harper: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz Cowan, Ruth, 1983: More Work for Mother: Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, G., J., 1998: Fuel Cells for the Future — A contribution to Technology forecasting from a Technology Dynamics Perspective, PhD Thesis, Univeristy of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, Elizabeth and Alan Warde, 1998: Inconspicuous Consumption: the sociology of consumption, lifestyles and the environment, in August Gijswijt, Frederick Buttel, Peter Dickens, Riley Dunlap, Arthur Mol and Gert Spaargaren (eds.) Sociological Theory and the Environment, Proceedings of the Second Woudschoten Conference, ISA Research Committee 24, SISWO, University of Amsterdam, pp. 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, Elizabeth, Loren Lutzenhiser, Simon Guy, Bruce Hackett, and Harold Wilhite, 1998: Energy and Social Systems, in Steve Rayner and Elizabeth Malone (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume 2, Resources and Technology, Ohio, Battelle Press, 1998. pp. 291–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Don, 1998: Themes from the Sociology of Consumption. ESRC network on Consumption, Environment and the Social Sciences, 6–7 July 1998, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G., 1997: The Ecological Modernisation of Production and Consumption: Essays in Environmental Sociology, PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolow, Robert H. (Ed), 1978: Saving Energy in the Home: Princeton’s Experiments at Twin Rivers. Ballinger: Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolow, Robert H., 1978: The Twin Rivers program on energy conservation in Housing. Energy and Buildings 1(3): pp. 207–242. Reprinted in Socolow (Ed) 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonderegger, Robert C., 1978: Movers and Stayers: The Resident’s Contribution to Variation across Houses in Energy Consumption for Space Heating. Energy and Buildings 1(1977/1978) pp. 313–324. Reprinted in Socolow (Ed)., 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Paul C. and E. Aronson (eds.), 1984: Energy Use: The Human Dimension, New York: W. H. Freeman Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Paul, Oran Young and Daniel Druckman, (eds.), 1992: Global Environmental Change: The Human Dimension. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, Alan, E. Shove, and D. Southerton, 1999: Convenience, schedules and sustainability. Reader, Lancaster Summer School on Consumption, Everyday Life and Sustainability, Lancaster University. August.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Leslie, 1975: The Concept of Cultural Systems: A Key to Understanding Tribes and Nations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Harold and Lutzenhiser, L., 1998: Social loading and sustainable consumption. Advances in Consumer Research 26: pp. 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Harold, H. Nakagami, T. Masuda, Y. Yamaga, H. Haneda, 1996a: A cross-cultural analysis of household energy-use behaviour in Japan and Norway. Energy Policy 24(9): pp. 795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Harold, H. Nakagami, and C. Murakoshi, 1996b: The dynamics of changing Japanese energy consumption patterns and their implications for sustainable consumption. Proceedings from the ACEEE 1996 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, Richard R. and Harold Wilhite, 1985: Why Don’t People Weatherize their_Homes?: An Ethnographic Solution.” Energy: The International Journal 10(5): pp. 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirl, Franz, 2000: Lessons from Utility Conservation Programs. The Energy Journal. 21: pp. 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilhite, H., Shove, E., Lutzenhiser, L., Kempton, W. (2000). The Legacy of Twenty Years of Energy Demand Management: we know more about Individual Behaviour but next to Nothing about Demand. In: Jochem, E., Sathaye, J., Bouille, D. (eds) Society, Behaviour, and Climate Change Mitigation. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48160-X_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48160-X_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6802-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48160-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics