Advertisement

Photosynthesis in Fluctuating Light Environments

  • Robert W. Pearcy
  • John P. Krall
  • Gretchen F. Sassenrath-Cole
Part of the Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration book series (AIPH, volume 5)

Summary

The light environment in plant canopies is characterized by rapid fluctuations in photon flux density (PFD) because of the occurrence of sunflecks. These sunflecks can contribute most of the PFD available for photosynthesis and thus the mechanisms that control their utilization can have a significant impact on the carbon gain within canopies or in understories. When sunflecks are infrequent, their utilization is constrained by the induction requirement of the photosynthetic apparatus. The induction requirement has been shown to involve three separate factors consisting of an increase in the capacity for regeneration of ribulose bisphosphate that is important in the first 1–2 min after a light increase, the light activation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase that occurs over the first 5–10 min of induction, and an increase in stomatal conductance. Under the conditions of multiple sunflecks occurring in varying succession characteristic of canopy light regimes, the induction state of a leaf is a function of the up and down regulation of these three factors. The induction state determines the readiness of a leaf to respond to a sunfleck in terms of the maximum assimilation rate that can be achieved during it. Post-lightfleck CO2 assimilation occurring because of the utilization of high-energy metabolite pools built up during the lightfleck can substantially enhance the utilization of short lightflecks. This buildup occurs because of a transient uncoupling of electron transport and carbon assimilation rates as 3-phosphoglyceric acid pools are reduced allowing for initially elevated electron transport rates during a lightfleck. Simulation modeling and measurements have shown that under natural sunfleck regimes in forest understories the induction state of leaves may limit daily assimilation by 10 to 25%. Post-lightfleck CO2 fixation, on the other hand, does not significantly enhance sunfleck use in this environment because the short sunflecks for which it is most important make little contribution to the available sunfleck PFD. Within crop canopies, where the contribution of short-duration sunflecks is much greater, simulation modeling indicates a more important role forpost-lightfleck CO2 fixation.

Keywords

Assimilation Rate Electron Transport Rate Induction State Carbon Gain Forest Understory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JM (1986) Photoregulation of the composition, function and structure of thylakoid membranes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 37: 93–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asada K. (1994) Production and action of active oxygen species in photosynthetic tissues. In: Foyer CH and Mullineaux PM (eds) Causes of Photooxidative Stress and Amelioration of Defense Systems in Plants, pp 77–104. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. Assmann SM, Simoncini L and Schroeder JI (1985) Blue light activates electrogenic ion pumping in guard cell protoplasts of Viciafaba. Nature 318: 285–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badger MR, Sharkey TD and von Caemmerer S (1984) The relationship between steady-state gas exchange of bean leaves and the levels of carbon-reducing-cycle intermediates. Planta 160: 305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Björkman O and Ludlow M (1972) Characterization of the light climate of a Queensland rainforest. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 71: 85–94Google Scholar
  6. Björkman O, Ludlow M and Morrow P (1972) Photosynthetic performance of two rainforest species in their habitat and analysis of their gas exchange. Carnegie Inst Wash Year Book 71: 94–102Google Scholar
  7. Bloom AJ, Caldwell RM, Finazzo J, Warner RL and Weissbart J (1989) Oxygen and carbon dioxide fluxes from barley shoots depend on nitrate assimilation. Plant Physiol 91: 352–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan BB (1980) Role of light in the regulation of chloroplast enzymes. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 31: 341–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell WJ and Ogren WL (1990) Electron transport through Photosystem I stimulates light activation of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (rubisco) by rubisco activase. Plant Physiol 94: 479–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chazdon RL (1988) Sunflecks and their importance to forest understory plants. Adv Ecol Res 18: 1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chazdon RL and Fetcher N (1984) Light environments of tropical forests. In: Medina E, Mooney HA and Vazquez-Yanes C (eds) Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics, pp 27–36. Dr. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  12. Chazdon RL and Pearcy RW (1986) Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rain forest species. II. Carbon gain and light utilization during lightflecks. Oecologia 69: 524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dromgoole FI (1987) Photosynthesis of marine algae in fluctuating light regimes. I. Adjustment of rate in constant and fluctuating light regimes. Funct Ecol 1: 377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dromgoole FI (1988) Light fluctuations and the photosynthesis of marine algae. II. Photosynthetic response to frequency, phase ratio and amplitude. Funct Ecol 2: 211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards G and Walker D (1983) C3, C4: Mechanisms, and Cellular and Environmental Regulation of Photosynthesis. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans GC, Whitmore TC and Wong TK (1960) The distribution of light reaching the ground vegetation in a tropical rainforest. J Ecol 48: 193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans JR (1987) The relationship between electron transport components and photosynthetic capacity in pea leaves grown at different irradiances. Aust J Plant Physiol 14: 157–170Google Scholar
  18. Farquhar GD and Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 33: 317–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farquhar GD and von Caemmerer S (1982) Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB and Ziegler H (eds) Physiological Plant Ecology II, Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology 12B, pp 549–588. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Foyer C, Furbank R, Harbinson J and Horton P (1990) The mechanisms contributing to photosyntlietic control of electron transport by carbon assimilation in leaves. Photosyn Res 25: 83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerard VA (1984) The light environment of a giant kelp forest: influence of Macrocystus pyrifera on spatial and temporal variability. Marine Biol 84: 189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Genty B, Brantais JM and Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of electron transport and the quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochem Biophys Acta 990: 87–92Google Scholar
  23. Grantz DA and Zeiger E (1986) Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapor pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean. Plant Physiol 81: 865–868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gross LJ, Kirschbaum MUF and Pearcy RW (1991) A dynamic model of photosynthesis in varying light taking account of stomatal conductance, C3-cycle intermediates, photorespiration and RuBisCO activation. Plant Cell Environ 14: 881–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hangarter RP and Good NE (1988) Active transport, ion movements and pH changes. II. Changes of pH and ATP synthesis. Photosyn Res 19: 237–250Google Scholar
  26. Harbinson J, Genty B and Baker NR (1990a) The relationship between CO2 assimilation and electron transport in leaves. Photosyn Res 25: 213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harbinson J, Genty B and Foyer CH (1990b) Relationship between photosynthetic electron transport and stromal enzyme activity in pea leaves—toward an understanding of the nature of photosynthetic control. Plant Physiol 94: 545–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Iino M, Ogawa T and Zeiger E (1985) Kinetic properties of the blue-light response of stomata. Proc Natl Acad Sci 82: 8019–8023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kiirats O (1985) Kinetics of CO2 and O2 exchange in sunflower leaves in d dark-light transitions. In: Viil J; Grishina G; and Laisk A, (eds), Kinetics of Photosynthetic Carbon Metabolism in C3-plants, pp 125–131. Valgus, TallinGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirschbaum MUF and Pearcy RW (1988a) Concurrent measurements of O2 and CO2 exchange during lightflecks in Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G. Don. Planta 174: 527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirschbaum MUF and Pearcy RW (1988b) Gas exchange analysis of the fast phase of photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Physiol 87: 818–821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirschbaum MUF and Pearcy RW (1988c) Gas exchange analysis of the relative importance of stomatal and biochemical factors in photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Physiol 86: 782–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirschbaum MUF, Gross LJ and Pearcy RW (1988) Observed and modelled stomatal responses to dynamic light environments in the shade plant Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Cell Environ 11:111–121Google Scholar
  34. Knapp AK (1992) Leaf gas exchange in Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae): rapid stomatal responses to variability in sunlight in a tree growth form. Amer J Bot 79: 599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knapp AK and Smith WK (1987) Stomatal and photosynthetic responses during sun/shade transitions in subalpine plants: influence on water use efficiency. Oecologia 74: 62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knapp AK and Smith WK (1990a) Contrasting stomatal responses to variable sunlight in two subalpine herbs. Amer J Bot 77: 226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knapp AK and Smith WK (1990b) Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight. Physiol Plant 78: 160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knapp AK, Smith WK and Young DR (1989) Importance of intermittent shade to the ecophysiology of subalpine herbs. Funct Ecol 3: 353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kobza J and Seemann JR (1988) Mechanisms for the light-dependent regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity and photosynthesis in intact leaves. Proc Nat Acad Sci 85:3815–3819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kobza J and Seemann JR (1989) Light-dependent kinetics of 2-carboxyarabinitol-1-phosphate metabolism and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity in vivo. Plant Physiol 89: 174–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Krall JP and Pearcy RW (1993) Concurrent measurements of oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange during lightflecks in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol 103: 823–828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Krall, JP, Shevelena EV and Pearcy RW (1995) Regulation of photosynthetic inductions state in high-and low-light grown soybean and Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G. Don. Plant Physiol 109:307–317Google Scholar
  43. Kriedemann PE, Torokfalvy E and Smart RE (1973) Natural occurrence and photosynthetic utilization of sunflecks in grapevine leaves. Photosynthetica 7: 18–27Google Scholar
  44. Küppers M and Schneider H (1993) Leaf gas exchange of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in lightflecks: effects of fleck length and leaf temperature in leaves grown in deep and partial shade. Trees 7: 160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Küppers M, Schneider H and Swan AG (1993) Leaf gas exchange ofbeech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in lightflecks: a system for measuring rapid changes in CO2 partial pressures. Photosyn Res 35: 299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kursar TA and Coley PD (1993) Photosynthetic induction times in shade-tolerant species with long and short-lived leaves. Oecologia 93: 165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Laisk A, Kiirats O and Oja V (1984) Assimilatory power (postillumination CO2 uptake) in leaves: Measurement, environmental dependencies and kinetic properties. Plant Physiol 76: 723–729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Laisk A, Kiirats O, Eichemann H and Oja V (1987) Gas exchange studies of carboxylation kinetics in intact leaves. In: Biggins J (ed) Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Vol 4, pp 245–252. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  49. Laisk A, Oja V, Kiirats O, Raschke K and Heber U (1989) The state of the photosynthetic apparatus in leaves as analyzed rapid gas exchange and optical methods: The pH of the chloroplast stroma and activation of enzymes in vivo. Planta 177:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laisk A, Kiirats O, Oja V, Gerst U, Weis E and Heber U (1992) Analysis of oxygen evolution during photosynthetic induction and in multiple-turnover flashes in sunflower leaves. Planta 186: 434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lan Y, Woodrow IE and Mott KA (1992) Light-dependent changes in ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activase activity in leaves. Plant Physiol 99: 304–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lundegarth L (1921) Ecological studies in the assimilation of certain forest plants. Su Bot Tidskr 15: 46Google Scholar
  53. Malkin S (1987) Fast photoacoustic transients from dark-adapted intact leaves: oxygen evolution and uptake pulses during photosynthetic induction—a phenomenology record. Planta 171:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oberbauer SF, Clark DB, Clark DA and Quesada MA (1988) Crown light environments of saplings of two species of rain forest emergent trees. Oecologia 75: 207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ort DR and Oxborough K (1992) In situ regulation of chloroplast coupling factor activity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43: 269–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osmond CB, Oja V and Laisk A (1988) Regulation of carboxylation and photosynthetic oscillations during sun-shade acclimation in Helianthus annus measured with a rapid-response gas exchange system. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 239–251Google Scholar
  57. Osterhout WJ and Hass JRC (1919) On the dynamics of photosynthesis. J Gen Physiol 1: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pearcy RW (1983) The light environment and growth of C3 and C4 tree species in the understory of a Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 58: 19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pearcy RW (1987) Photosynthetic gas exchange responses of Australian tropical forest trees in canopy, gap and understory micro-environments. Funct Ecol 1: 169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pearcy RW (1988) Photosynthetic utilization of lightflecks by understory plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 223–238Google Scholar
  61. Pearcy RW (1990) Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41: 421–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pearcy RW (1993) Sunfleck utilization. In: GAP Hendry and Grime JP (eds) Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology, pp 68–72. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Pearcy RW and Calkin H (1983) Carbon dioxide exchange of C3 and C4 tree species in the understory of a Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 58: 26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pearcy RW and Francheschi V (1986) Photosynthetic characteristics of C3 and C4 tree species grown in high and low light environments. Photosyn Res 9: 317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pearcy RW and Seemann JR (1990) Photosynthetic induction state of leaves in a soybean canopy in relation to light regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol 94: 628–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pearcy RW and Pfitsch WA (1991) Influence of sunflecks on the δ13C of Adenocaulon bicolor plants occurring in contrasting forest understory microsites. Oecologia 86: 457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pearcy RW, Roden JS and Gamon JA (1990) Sunfleck dynamics in relation to canopy structure in a soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) canopy. Ag Forest Meteorol 52: 359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pearcy RW, Chazdon RL Gross LJ and Mott KA (1994) Photosynthetic utilization of sunflecks, a temporally patchy resource on a time-scale of seconds to minutes. In: Caldwell MM and Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants, pp 175–208. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  69. Perchorowicz JT, Raynes DA and Jensen RG (1981) Light limitation of photosynthesis and activation of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase in wheat seedlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci 78: 2985–2989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pfitsch WA and Pearcy RW (1989a) Daily carbon gain by Adenocaulon bicolor, a redwood forest understory herb, in relation to its light environment. Oecologia 80: 465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pfitsch WA and Pearcy RW (1989b) Steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic response of Adenocaulon bicolor in its redwood forest habitat. Oecologia 80: 471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pollard DFW (1970) The effect of rapidly changing light on the rate of photosynthesis in largetooth aspen (Populus grandidentata). Can J Bot 48: 823–829Google Scholar
  73. Pons TL and Pearcy RW (1992) Photosynthesis in flashing light of soybean leaves grown in different conditions. II. Lightfleck utilization efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 15: 577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pons TL, Pearcy RW and Seemann JR (1992) Photosynthesis in flashing light of soybean leaves grown in different conditions. I. Photosynthetic induction state and regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity. Plant Cell Environ 15: 569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Poorter L and Oberbauer SF (1993) Photosynthetic induction responses of two rainforest tree species in relation to light environment. Oecologia 96: 193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Portis AR (1992) Regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase activity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43: 415–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Raschke K (1979) Movements of stomata. In: Haupt W and Feinleib ME (eds) Physiology of Movements. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol 7, pp 383–441. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  78. Roden JS and Pearcy RW (1993a) Effect of leaf flutter on the light environment of poplars. Oecologia 93: 201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roden JS and Pearcy RW (1993b) Photosynthetic gas exchange response of poplars to steady-state and dynamic light environments. Oecologia 93: 208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sage RF, Reid CD, Moore BD and Seemann JR (1993) Long-term kinetics of the light-dependent regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase activity in plants with and without 2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphate. Planta 191: 222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Salvucchi ME, Portis AR and Ogren WL, Jr. (1986) A soluble chloroplast protein catalyzes ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activation in vivo. Photosynth Res 7: 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sassenrath-Cole GF and Pearcy RW (1992) The role of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration in the induction requirement of photosynthetic CO2 exchange under transient light conditions. Plant Physiol 99: 227–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Sassenrath-Cole GF and Pearcy RW (1994) Regulation of photosynthetic induction state by the magnitude and duration of low light exposure. Plant Physiol 105: 1115–1123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Sassenrath-Cole GF, Pearcy RW and Steinmaus S (1994) The role of enzyme activation state in limiting carbon assimilation under variable light conditions. Photosynth Res 41:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schulze E-D (1972) Die Wirking von Licht und Temperatur auf den CO2-Gaswechel verschiedener Lebensformen aus der Kractschicht eines montanen Buchenwaldes. Oecologia 9: 223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Seemann JR, Sharkey TD, Wang JL and Osmond CB (1987) Environmental effects on photosynthesis, nitrogen-use efficiency, and metabolite pools in leaves of sun and shade plants. Plant Physiol 84: 796–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Seemann JR, Kirschbaum MUF, Sharkey TD and Pearcy RW (1988) Regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity in Alocasia macrorrhiza in response to step changes in irradiance. Plant Physiol 88: 148–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Sharkey TD (1989) Evaluating the role of rubisco regulation in photosynthesis of C3 plants. Phil Trans R Soc Lond, Ser B 323: 435–448Google Scholar
  89. Sharkey TD, Seemann JR and Pearcy RW (1986) Contribution of metabolites of photosynthesis topostillumination CO2 assimilation in response to lightflecks. Plant Physiol 82: 1063–1068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Siebke K, Laisk A, Oja V, Kiirats O, Raschke K and Heber U (1990) Control of photosynthesis in leaves as revealed by rapid gas exchange and measurements of the assimilatory force Fa. Planta 182:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sims DA and Pearcy RW (1989) Photosynthetic characteristics of a tropical forest understory herb, Alocasia macrorrhiza, and are lated crop species, Colocasia esculenta, grown in contrasting light environments. Oecologia 79: 53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stitt M (1986) Limitation of photosynthesis by carbon metabolism. I. evidence for excess electron transport capacity in leaves carrying out photosynthesis in saturating light and CO2. Plant Physiol 81: 1115–1122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Stitt M, Scheibe R and Feil R (1989) Response of photosynthetic electron transport and carbon metabolism to a sudden decrease in irradiance in the saturating or the limiting range. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 973: 241–249Google Scholar
  94. Streusand VJ and Portis AR (1987) Rubisco activase mediates ATP-dependent activation of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase. Plant Physiol 85: 152–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Takahama U, Shimizu-Takahama M and Heber U (1981) The redox state of the of the NADP system in illuminated chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 637: 530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tang Y-H, Wasitani I, Tsuchiya T and Iwaki H (1988) Fluctuation of photosynthetic photon flux density within a Miscanthus sineusis canopy. Ecol Res 3: 253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tang Y-H, Washitani I, Tsuchiya T and Iwaki H (1989) Spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic photon flux density in the canopy of Miscanthus sinensis. Ecol Res 4: 339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Terashima I, Wong S, Osmond CB and Farquhar GD (1988) Characterization of non-uniform photosynthesis induced by abcisic acid in leaves having different mesophyll anatomies. Plant Cell Physiol 29: 385–394Google Scholar
  99. Thompson WA, Stocker GC and Kriedemann PE (1988) Growth and photosynthetic response to light and nutrients of Flindersia brayleyana F. Muell., a rainforest tree with broad tolerance to sun and shade. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 299–315Google Scholar
  100. Tinoco-Ojanguren C and Pearcy RW (1992) Dynamic stomatal behavior and its role in carbon gain during lightflecks of a gap phase and an understory Piper species acclimated to high and low light. Oecologia 92: 222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tinoco-Ojanguren C and Pearcy RW (1993a) Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species. II. Stomatal versus biochemical limitations during photosynthetic induction. Oecologia 94: 395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tinoco-Ojanguren C and Pearcy RW (1993b) Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in 2 rainforest Piper species. I. VPD effects on the transient stomatal response to lightflecks. Oecologia 94: 388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. von Caemmerer S and Edmondson DL (1986) Relationship between steady-state gas exchange, in vivo ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity and some carbon reduction cycle intermediates in Raphanus sativus. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 669–688Google Scholar
  104. Walker DA (1973) Photosynthetic induction phenomena and the light activation of ribulose diphosphate carboxylase. New Phytol 72: 209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Walker DA (1981) Photosynthetic induction. In: Akoyonoglou G (ed) Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Photosynthesis Vol IV, pp 189–202. Balaban International, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  106. Walters MB and Field CB (1987) Photosynthetic light acclimation in two rainforest Piper species with different ecological amplitudes. Oecologia 72: 449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Watling J and Woodrow I (1993) A new kind of induction response found in two rainforest species. In: Murata N (ed) Research in Photosynthesis, Vol I, pp 189–192. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  108. Weber JA, Jurik TW, Tenhunen JD and Gates DM (1985) Analysis of gas exchange in seedlings of Acer saccharum: integration of field and laboratory studies. Oecologia 65: 338–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Woodrow IE and Berry JA (1988) Enzymatic regulation of photosynthetic CO2 fixation in C3 plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39: 533–594Google Scholar
  110. Woodrow IE and Mott KA (1989) Rate limitation of non-steady-state photosynthesis by ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in spinach. Aust J Plant Physiol 16: 487–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Woods DB and Turner NC (1972) Stomatal response to changing light by four species of varying shade tolerance. New Phytol 70: 77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zeiger E (1983) The biology of stomatal guard cells. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 34: 441–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Pearcy
    • 1
  • John P. Krall
    • 1
  • Gretchen F. Sassenrath-Cole
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Plant BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARS Crop Simulation Research UnitDepartment of Plant and Soil ScienceMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations