Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Activity-Based Modeling of Travel Demand

  • Chapter
Handbook of Transportation Science

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 56))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, T. and M. Ben-Akiva (1979) Atheoretical and empirical model of trip-chaining behavior, Transportation Research, 13B, 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axhausen, K. and T. Garling (1992) Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models and research problems, Transport Reviews, 12, 324–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard and Hensher (1992) The spatial distribution of retail expenditures, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, September, 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggan, J.G. (1988) The relationship between travel/activity behavior and mode choice for the work trip, unpublished Master’s Thesis, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R. Lerman (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and D. Bolduc (1996) Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure, working paper, Department of Civil and Environmental engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA and Département d’économique, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Qc, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M.E. and J.L. Bowman (1995) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with daily activity schedules, Paper presented at the EIRASS Conference on Activity-Based Approaches: Activity Scheduling and the Analysis of Activity patterns, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. and F.S. Koppelman (1993) An endogenous switching simultaneous equation system of employment, income, and car ownership, Transportation Research, 27A,6, 447–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme-value model of intercity mode choice, Transportation Research, 29B,6, 471–483.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1996a) A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogenetty, Transporation Research, 30B,3, 189–207.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1996b) Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in work mode choice modeling, forthcoming in Transportation Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1997a) Recent methodological advances relevant to activity and travel behavior analysis, invitational resource paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Travel Behavior Research Conference to be held in Austin, Texas, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1997b) An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel, Transportation Science, 31, 34–48.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1997c) A nested logit model with covariance heterogeneity, Transportation Research, 31B, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1997d) Work mode choice and number of non-work commute stops, Transportation Research, 31 B, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1998a) Modeling the commute activity-travel pattern of workers: formulation and empirical analysis, Technical Paper, Department of Civil Engineering, University ofTexas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1998b) An analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips, Transportation Research, 32B, 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1998c) Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multidimensional choice modeling: formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice, Transportation Research, 32B, 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1998d) Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling, Transportation Research, 32A, 495–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. (1998e) A post-home arrival model of activity participation behavior, Transportation Research, 32B, 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. and S.K. Singh (1999) A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for workers, forthcoming, Transportation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R. and F.S. Koppelman (1998) A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research, under consideration for possible publication in a special time-use issue in Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., J.P. Carini and R. Misra (1999) On the generation and organization of household activity stops, forthcoming, Transportation Research Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstone, D. and K. Train (1999) Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, pp. 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, D.S. and R. Kitamura (1990) Multinomial probit model estimation revisited: testing estimable model specifications, maximum likelihood algorithms, and probit integral approximations for trinomial models of household car ownership, UCD-ITS-RP-90-1, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (1994) Short-Term Travel Model Improvements, Final report (DOT-95-05), Prepared for the U.S. Department ofTransportation and US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data, Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225–238.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M.I. (1986) Activity modelling — a research tool or a practical planning technique ?, in Behavioral Research for Transport Policy, 3–15, VNU Science Press, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S., Jr. (1971) Free-time activities and the quality of urban life, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 37, 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, C. (1989) A paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis, Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, 295–309, Ventura, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972) Regression models with life tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 34,187–220.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, I. and V. Godson (1975) Urban networks: the structure of activity patterns, Progress in Planning, 4, 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, I. and E. Phelps (1975) Diary techniques and the problems of urban life, Final Report submitted to the Social Science Research Council, Grant HR 2336, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, D. (1980) Interdependencies in activity behavior”, Transportation Research Record, 750, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo, C. (1979) Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo, C.F. and M. Kusnic (1993) Two properties of the nested logit model, Transportation Science, 27, 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A.J. and S. Zachary (1978) Improved multiple choice models, in D.A. Hensher and M.Q. Dalvi (eds.) Determinants of Travel Choice, Saxon House, Westmead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, Harvey, Skabardonis, Inc.(1993) Manual of Regional Transportation Modeling Practice for Air Quality Analysis, The National Association of Regional Councils, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijst, M. and V. Vidakovic. (1997) Individual action space in the city, in Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, ed. Dick Ettema and Harry Timmermans. Elsevier Science, Ltd., pp. 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, D., A.W.J. Borgers and H.J.P. Timmermans (1993) Simulation model of activity scheduling behavior, Transportation Research Record, 1413, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellendorf, M., T. Haupt, U. Heidi and W. Scherr (1997) PTV vision: activity-based demand forecasting in daily practice, in Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, editors: Ettema, D.F. and H.J.P. Timmermans, 55–71, Elsevier Science Ltd. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D. and P.M. Jones (1990) HATS study of wheelchair disability in Adelaide, Report to the Director General of Transport, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T.. K. Brannas, J. Garvill, R.G. Golledge, S. Gopal, E. Holm and E. Lindberg (1989). Household activity scheduling. In Transport policy, management & technology towards 2001: Selected proceedings of the fifth world conference on transport research (Vol. IV, pp. 235–248). Ventura, CA: Western Periodicals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., M.P. Kwan and R.G. Golledge (1994) Computational-process modeling of household travel activity scheduling, Transportation Research, 25B, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliebe, J.P., F.S. Koppelman and A. Ziliaskopoulos (1998) Route choice using a paired combinatorial logit model, prepared for presentation at the 78th meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R.G., M.P. Kwan and T. Gärling (1994) Computational process modeling of travel decisions using geographical information systems, Papers in Regional Science, 73–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T.F.(1986) A non-linear canonical correlation analysis of weekly chaining behavior, Transportation Research, 20A, 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, D. and M. Ben-Akiva (1995) Estimation of randomly distributed value of time, working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., A Kumar and H.W. Richardson (1988) Beyond the journey to work, Transportation Research, 21A,6, 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulias, K.G., R.M. Pendyala and R. Kitamura (1989) Practical method for the estimation of trip generation and trip chaining, Transportation Research Record, 1285, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T.(1970) What about people in regional science?, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamed, M.M and F.L. Mannering (1993) Modeling travelers’ postwork activity involvement: toward a new methodology, Transportation Science, 27,4, 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, A. and J.A. Hausman (1990) Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S.(1980) Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: implications for choice theory, Geographical Analysis, 12, 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. and G. Pratt (1988) Reconceptualizng the links between home and work in urban geography, Economic Geography, 64, 299–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. and G. Pratt (1992) Dynamic dependencies: a geographic investigation of local labor markets, Economic Geography, 68, 373–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. and B. Singer (1984) A method for minimizing the distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data, Econometrica, 52, 271–320.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. and F.L. Mannering (1994) Hazard-based duration models and their application to transport analysis, Transport Reviews, 14,1, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. (1998a) Establishing a fare elasticity regime for urban passenger transport, Journal of Transport Economics andPolicy, 32(2), 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. (1998b) Extending valuation to controlled value functions and non-uniform scaling with generalized unobserved variances. In Gärling, T., Laitila, T., & Westin, K. Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling. Oxford: Pergamon, 75–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., J. Louviere, and J. Swait (1999) Combining sources of preference data, Journal of Econometrics, 89, 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, M., J.N. Prashker and M.E. Ben-Akiva (1986).“Dynamic Model of Weekly Activity Pattern, Transportation Science, 20,, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, J.L.(1980). A utility maximizing model of the demand for multi-destination non-work travel, Transportation Research, 14B, 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Anumonwo, I.(1995) Racial differences in the commuting behavior of women in Buffalo, 1980–1990, Urban Geography, 16, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.M., F.S. Koppelman, and J.P. Orfeuil (1990) Activity analysis: state of the art and future directions, in Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, 34–55, Gower, Aldershot, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jou, R-C and H.S. Mahmassani (1997) Comparative analysis of day-to-day trip chaining behavior of urban commuters in two cities, forthcoming, Transportation Research Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.G., M. Hamed and F. Mannering (1993) A note on modeling travelers’ home-stay duration and the efficiency of proportional hazards model, working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R.(1983) A sequential, history dependent approach to trip chaining behavior, Transportation Research Record, 944, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R. and M. Kermanshah (1983) Identifying time and history dependencies of activity choice, Transportation Research Record, 944, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R.(1984) Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice, Transportation Research, 18B, 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R., E.I. Pas, C.V. Lula, T.K. Lawton, and P.E. Benson (1996) The sequenced activity mobility simulator (SAMS): an integrated approach to modeling transportation, land use and air quality, Transportation, 23, 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R. and S. Fujii (1998) Two computational process models of activity-travel behavior, In T. Garling, T. Laitila and K. Westin (eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 251–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R., T. Yamamoto, S. Fujii and S. Sampath (1996). A discrete-continuous analysis of time allocation to two types of discretionary activities which accounts for unobserved heterogeneity”, in J.B. Lesort (editor) Transportation and Traffic Theory, 431–453, Elsevier, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman, F.S. and C-H Wen (1996) The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application, Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraan, M.(1996) Time to travel?; a model for the allocation of time and money, Unpublished Ph.D.dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S-H (1991) Multinomial probit model estimation: computational procedures and applications, Unpublished Ph.D.dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S-H. and H.S. Mahmassani (1991) Multinomial probit model estimation: computational procedures and applications, in Methods for Understanding Travel Behavior in the 1990s, Proceedings of the International Association of Travel Behavior, 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, T.K. and E.I. Pas (1996) Resource paper for survey methodologies workshop, Conference Proceedings on Household Travel Surveys: New Concepts and Research Needs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.(1996). Analysis of accessibility and travel behavior using GIS, Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S.(1979).“The Use of Disaggregate Choice Models in Semi-Markov Process Models of Trip Chaining Behavior”, Transportation Science, 13, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, P.B. and M.J. Demetsky (1994) Nonwork travel — A study of changing behavior”, presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.F.(1983) Generalized econometric models with selectivity, Econometrica, 51,2, 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, H. and A. Peters (1994) Spatial constraints on rural women workers, Urban Geography, 15, 720–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannering, F., E. Murakami and S.G. Kim (1994) Temporal stability of travelers’ activity choice and home-stay duration: some empirical evidence, Transportation, 21, 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior in Zaremmbka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. and K. Train (1996) Mixed MNL models for discrete response, working paper, Department of economics, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, D.P. (1995) Spatial effects in probit models: a monte carlo investigation, in L. Anselin and R.J.G.M. Florax (editors) New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D.(1990) Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells, Econometrica, 58,4, 757–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, P.L.(1993) The travel and urban form implications of telecommunications technology, Discussion Paper for FHWA/LILP Workshop on Metropolitan America in Transition: Implications for Land Use and Transportation Planning, Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeier, D.A. and J.G. Morita (1996) Duration of trip-making activities by men and women, Transportation, 23,353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. and H.A. Simon (1972) Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, K., K. Kondo and R. Kitamura (1988) Empirical analysis of trip-chaining behavior, Transportation Research Record, 1203, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, M.E. and E.J. Miller (1984) Characteristics of multistop multipurpose travel: an empirical study of trip length, Transportation Research Record, 976,33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas, E.I. (1997) tRecent advances in activity-based travel demand modeling, Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference Proceedings, June 2–5, 1996, Summary, Recommendations and Compendium of Papers, February 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas, E.I. and F.S. Koppelman (1986).“An Examination of the Determinants ofDay-to-Day Variability in Individuals’ Urban Travel Behavior, Transportation, 13, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paselk, T. and F. Mannering (1993) Use of duration models to predict vehicular delay at US/Canadian border crossings, paper presented at the 1993 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, V., S. McLafferty and E. Hamilton (1993) The impact of family status on black, white, and hispanic women’s commuting, Urban Geography, 14, 228–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, C.L., M. Iglesias and V.A. Eisen (1996) Incorporating work trip accessibility in non-work trip generation models in the San Francisco Bay area, presented at the 75th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C., January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, W.W. (1995a) The household activity pattern problem: general formulation and solution, Transportation Research, 29B, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, W.W. (1995b) Discrete choice with an oddball alternative, Transportation Research, 29B, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, W.W., M.G. McNally and G.S. Root (1986a) A model of complex travel behavior: part i. Theoretical development, Transportation Research, 20A, 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, W.W., M.G. McNally and G.S. Root (1986b) A model of complex travel behavior: part ii. An operational model, Transportation Research, 20A, 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, K.A. (1987) A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives, Econometrica, 55(2), 409–424.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, B.D. (1994) New approaches to travel forecasting models: a synthesis of four research proposals, Final Report (DOT-T-94-15) submitted to the U.S.Department of Transportation and US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speckman, P., K.M. Vaughn and E.I. Pas (1997) A Continuous Spatial Interaction Model: Application to-Home-Work Travel in Portland, Oregon, presented at the 1997 Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckel, J.H. and W.R. Vanhonacker (1988) A heterogenous conditional logit model of choice, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 6, 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swait, J. and E.C. Stacey (1996) Consumer brand assessment and assessment confidence in models of longitudinal choice behavior, presented at the 1996 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Gainesville, FL, March 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swait, J. and W. Adamowicz (1996) The effect of choice environment and task demands on consumer behavior: discriminating between contribution and confusion, working paper, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, J-C. and J.L. Horowitz (1997a), Travel time constraints on destination-choice sets, Geographic Analysis, 29, 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, J-C. and J.L. Horowitz (1997b), Modeling nonwork destination choices with choice sets defined by travel time constraints, Department of Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. (1995) Simulation methods for probit and related models based on convenient error partitioning, working paper, Department of economics, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoorn, T.(1983) Development of an activity model using a one-week activity-diary data base, in S. Carpenter & P. Jones (eds.), Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis, 335–349, Gower, Aldershot, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vause, M.(1997) A rule-based model of activity scheduling behavior, in Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, editors: Ettema, D.F. and H.J.P. Timmermans, 73–88, Elsevier Science Ltd. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vovsha, P. (1997) The cross-nested logit model: application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area, presented at the 1997 Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, K.M., P. Speckman and E.I. Pas. (1997) Generating household activity-travel patterns (HATPs) for synthetic populations, presented at the 1997 Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, C. (1998) Development of stop generation and tour formation models for the analysis of travel/activity behavior, Unpublished Ph.D.dissertation, Dept.of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, C. and F.S. Koppelman (1997) A conceptual and methodological framework for the generation of activity-travel patterns, Proceedings, The International Association of Travel Behavior Research Conference, Austin, Texas, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, C. and F.S. Koppelman (1999) An Integrated Model System of Stop Generation and Tour Formation for the Analysis of Activity and Travel Patterns, forthcoming, Transportation Research Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H.C.W.L (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit, Environment and Planning, 9 A, 285–344.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Chandra R. Bhat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank S. Koppelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, USA

    Randolph W. Hall

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhat, C.R., Koppelman, F.S. (2003). Activity-Based Modeling of Travel Demand. In: Hall, R.W. (eds) Handbook of Transportation Science. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 56. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48058-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48058-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7246-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48058-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation