Skip to main content

The Kyoto Regime, Changing Patterns of International Trade and Carbon Leakage

  • Chapter
Environmental Economics and the International Economy

Part of the book series: Economy & Environment ((ECEN,volume 25))

Abstract

A group of industrialized countries and countries with economies in transition have agreed to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases under the Kyoto Protocol. Energy- en carbon-intensive industries in these countries fear that policies to implements these reduction targets will harm their competitiveness, endanger employment and will not improve the global environment, because of carbon leakage. Various studies have analyzed competitiveness and carbon leakage. Of the many factors that potentially affect competitiveness and carbon leakage, changes in import tariffs have received little attention in the literature. Yet we know that, at least until 2005, tariffs and other trade barriers will be subject to the gradual implementation of the Uruguay Round agreements on trade liberalization. This paper presents quantitative estimates of the impacts of the implementation of the Kyoto agreements on carbon leakage with and without the full implementation of the Uruguay Round import tariff reductions. We find that the implementation of the Uruguay Round increases the rate of carbon leakage. This is caused by impacts on the world energy markets, reducing the price of energy commodities for developing countries. There is no evidence, however, that the tariff reductions increase industrial relocation. To the contrary, the Uruguay Round tariff reductions strengthen the competitive advantage of Northern CO2-intensive industries in comparison to a CO2 reduction scenario without trade liberalization.

We would like to thank Frank van Tongeren of the Agricultural Research Institute of the Netherlands for valuable advice and help on modelling and data. We would also like to thank participants of the Conference on The International Dimension of Environmental Policy, especially Carol McAusland and Scott Taylor for valuable comments on a previous draft of this paper. Finally we thank an anonymous referee for drawing our attention to some important publications and for suggestions to improve the exposition. All errors remain ours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., & Taylor, M.S. (2001), Is Free Trade Good For The Environment?, American Economic Review, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M.H., Maskus, K.E., & Rutherford, T.F. (1997), Carbon Taxes and the Global Trading System, Working Paper, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., & Johnstone, N. (1998), International Competitiveness and Carbon Taxation. In: Barker, T. and J. Köhler (eds.), International Competitiveness and Environmental Policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, UK/Northampton, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. (1999), Achieving a 10% Cut in Europe’s Carbon Dioxide Emissions using Additional Excise Duties: Coordinated, Uncoordinated and Unilateral Action using the Econometric Model E3ME, Economic Systems Research, 11/4, 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer, Ch., & Rutherford, Th. F. (2000), Decomposing the Costs of Kyoto: A Global CGE Analysis of Multilateral Policy Impacts, Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Crete.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, J., Manders, T., & Timmer, H. (2000), Decomposing Carbon Leakage, Third Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, June 27–30, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burniaux, J.-M., & Martins, J.O. (1999), Carbon Emission Leakage: A General Equilibrium View, ECO/WKP(2000)15, Economics Department Working Papers No. 242, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burniaux, J.-M., & O’Brien, P. (1999), Action Against Climate Change. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M.A., Rayner, A.J., & Bates, J.M. (1998), Trade Liberalization and the Environment: The Case of the Uruguay Round, The World Economy, 21/3, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M.A. (2000), Trade Liberalization, Economic Growth and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. R, & Taylor, M.S. (2000), Free Trade and Global Warming: A Trade Theory View of the Kyoto Protocol, National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J.F., McDonald, B., & Nordstrom, H. (1995), Assessing the Uruguay Round. In W. Martins and A.L. Winters (eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J. F., & Strutt, A. (1999), Post Uruguay Round Tariff Vectors for GTAP Version 4, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A.B. (1991), Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, Th. W., (ed.)(1997), Global Trade Analysis Project: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, Th. W., Anderson, K., Francois, J.F., & Martin, W. (2000), Agriculture and Non-agricultural Liberalization in the Millennium Round. Revised version of a paper presented at the Global Conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda; Interests and Options in the WTO 2000 Negotiations, World Bank and WTO, Geneva, October 1–2, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (1998). World Energy Outlook. International Energy Agency, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, T., Folmer, H., & Komen, R. (1998), Impacts of Environmental Policy on International Trade and Capital Movement: A Synopsis of the Macroeconomic Literature, World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Venice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., & Wilcoxen, P. (1993), Reducing US Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium, Resource and Energy Economics, 15/1,7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, M., Kolstad, C., & Rutherford, T. (1999), Coal Markets and the Kyoto Protocol, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Van Leeuwen, N., Thanh Vo, T., Tyers, R., & Hertel, Th. W. (1998), Disaggregating Labor Payments by Skill Level in GTAP, GTAP Technical Paper 11, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. J., Ross, M.T., Shackleton, R., & Wilcoxen, P.J.(1999), Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal, Special Issue: Weyant, J.P. (ed), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, 287–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordström, H., & Vaughan, S. (1999), Trade and Environment, Special Studies 4, World Trade Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberthür, S., & Ott, H.E. (1999), The Kyoto Protocol-International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong, T. P. (1999), The Use of Global Trade and Energy Volume Data for the Analysis of Global Energy-Environmental Issues — Some Illustrative Experiments, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verikios, G., & Hanslow, K. (1999), Modeling the Effects of Implementing the Uruguay Round: A Comparison Using the GTAP Model Under Alternative Treatments of International Capital Mobility, Second Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. 6-20-1999, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, J.P., & Hill, J.N. (1999), Introduction and Overview, The Energy Journal, Special Issue: Weyant, J.P. (ed.), The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation], vii–xliv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1994), Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 878–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.C., et. al.. (1983), Arbeit ohne Umweltzerstörung: Strategien einer neuen Wirtschafts-politik, Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1993), Strategies for the International Protection of the Environment, Journal of Public Economics, 52, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finus, M. (2001), Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. (1975), International Externalities and Optimal Tax Structures, Journal of International Economics, 5, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1991), Free Trade: The Great Destroyer, The Ecologist, 20, 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1991), America’s Green Strategy, Scientific American, 264/4, 96.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. (1995), Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R. (1992), Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy, Washington: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P.P. (1970), Unfashionable Economics. Essays in Honour of Lord Balogh, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulph, A. (1997), Environmental Policy and International Trade: A Survey of Recent Economic Analysis, in: H. Folmer, T. Tietenberg, (eds.), International Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1997/98, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 205–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuik, O., Verbruggen, H. (2002). The Kyoto Regime, Changing Patterns of International Trade and Carbon Leakage. In: Marsiliani, L., Rauscher, M., Withagen, C. (eds) Environmental Economics and the International Economy. Economy & Environment, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48021-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48021-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0841-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48021-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics