This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakker, C., & van der Linden, S. (1995). Health related utility measurement: An introduction. The Journal of Rheumatology, 22, 1197–1199.
Ferwerda, M. P. (1987). Statistische analyse van smartegelduitspraken [Statistical analysis of non-pecuniary damages judgments]. Verkeersrecht, 5, 122–124.
Levine, D. I., & Stolker, C. J. J. M. (2001). Compensating for psychiatric damage after disasters; A plea for a multifactor approach. In E. R. Muller & C. J. J. M. Stolker (Eds.), Ramp en recht (pp. 127–148). The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Lindenbergh, S. D. (1998). Smartengeld [Nonpecuniary damages]. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Stolker, C. J. J. M. (1990). The unconscious plaintiff: Consciousness as a prerequisite for compensation of non-pecuniary loss. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 39, 82–100.
Stolker, C. J. J. M., & Poletiek, F. H. (1998). Smartengeld—Wat zijn we eigenlijk aan het doen? Naar een juridische en psychologische evaluatie [Toward a legal and psychological evaluation of nonpecuniary damages]. In F. Stadermann et al. (Ed.), Bewijs en letselschade (pp. 71–86). Lelystad, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Vermande.
O’Brien, B., & Viramontes, J. L. (1994). Willingness to pay: A valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Medical Decision Making, 14, 289–297.
Pieters, J. A., & Busschbach, J. J. van. (1989). Een empirisch onderzoek naar de vaststelling van smartengeld in geval van letsel [An empirical investigation into the assessment of damages in case of injury]. Verkeersrecht, 6, 141–146.
van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (pp. 49–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vollbehr, W. (1989). Smartegeld en willekeur [Nonpecuniary damages and arbitrariness]. Verkeersrecht, 6, 146–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poletiek, F.H., Stolker, C.J.J.M. (2004). Who Decides the Worth of an Arm and a Leg? Assessing the Monetary Value of Nonmonetary Damage. In: Kurz-Milcke, E., Gigerenzer, G. (eds) Experts in Science and Society. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47964-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47964-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47903-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47964-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive