Skip to main content

Migration of Exotic Pests: Phytosanitary Regulations and Cooperative Policies to Protect U.S. Ecosystems and Agricultural Interests

  • Chapter
Both Sides of the Border

Part of the book series: The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources ((ENGO,volume 2))

  • 315 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, B.P. “Pest Control in the Public Interest: Crop Protection in California,” UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 8(1): 31–71. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer, “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18: 83–100, February 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Agriculture, “Medfly–going but not gone” California Agriculture. March/April 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, James R., “The Mediterranean fruit fly in California: taking stock,” California Agriculture 46(1): 12–17. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Janet, Leonard Gianessi, and Lori Lynch, “Economic Analysis of the Methyl Bromide Ban,” National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy Report, February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrograph, “California Sets Defenses for a Trans-Pacific Invasion, but Gets a Surprise Attack from South of the Border” Citrograph. December 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrograph, “Mexican Fruit Fly Is Persistent Foe in Eradication Effort,” Citrograph. February 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrograph, “Fruit Fly Find Stirs Action on Mexican Citrus Imports,” Citrograph. April 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrograph, “Mexican Fruit Fly Found in Los Angeles Again,” Citrograph. May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrograph, “Detection System Nips New Mexican Fruit Fly Outbreak,” Citrograph. May 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Klaus, “Taxes and Subsidies for Pollution-Intensive Industries as Trade Policy,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25:121–135, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock, Raymond H. and Marcia Kreith, eds. Exotic Pests and Diseases: Biology, Economics, Public Policy, Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curlett, Ed. Fact Sheet: Mexican Fruit Fly USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, May 1993, http://www.ceris.purdue.edu/napis/pests/ffmx/facts.txt

  • Dahlsten, D.L., R. Garcia, and H. Lorraine, “Eradication as a Pest Management Tool: Concepts and Contexts,” Eradication of Exotic Pests: Analysis with Case Histories, D. L. Dahlsten and R. Garcia, eds. Dexter, MI: Thompson-Shore Inc., 1989 p 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danthanarayana, W., Ed. Insect Flight: Dispersal and Migration, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, Robert V. and Raymond Gill. Exotic Invertebrates and Their Effects on California. Division of Plant Industry, California Department of Food and Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, Robert V., and Conrad J. Krass. Exotic Pests pose Growing Problem for California, California Agriculture 46(1):6–12 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehler, L.E. and P.C. Endicott, “Effect of Malathion-Bait Sprays on Biological Control of Insect Pests of Olive, Citrus, and Walnut,” Hilgardia 52(5): 1–47. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Assessment Team, Report on the Environmental Assessment of Pesticide Regulatory Programs, California Department of Food and Agriculture, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS), Calendar year 1990, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., November 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, Ken and Lori Lynch. Effects of a Free Trade Agreement on U.S. and Mexican Sanitary and Phytosanitary Regulations. USDA Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin, No. 649, May 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO, U.S. General Accounting Office, Agricultural Inspection: Improvement Needed to Minimize Threat of Foreign Pests and Diseases, GAO/RCED-97-102, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, Janette, “Economic Impact of the Establishment of Mexican Fruit Fly in the United States.” USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krissoff, B., L. Calvin and D. Gray. “Barriers to Trade in Global Apple Markets,” Fruit and Tree Nuts Situation and Outlook. FTS-280, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorraine, H. The California 1980 Medfly Crisis; An Analysis of Uncertainty Management under Conditions of Non-Routine Problem Solving, University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D. dissertation, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Lori. Agricultural Trade and Environmental Concerns: Three Essays Exploring Pest Control Regulations and Environmental Issues, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi, A., G. Rohwer, and D.S. Campbell, “Fruit Fly Free Areas: Strategies to Develop Them.” in C.O. Calkins, W. Klassen and P. Liedo (eds). Fruit Flies and the Sterile Insect Technique. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangle, M. Pest Control: Operations and System Analysis in Fruit Fly Management. New York: NATA ASI Series, Springer-Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J., USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, personal communication, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, Pekka and William J. Mattson, “Invasion of North American forests by European phytophagous insects.” BioScience 46 (Nov): 741–53, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrbom, A. And K. Kim, A List of the Reported Host Plants of the Specifies of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae), USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service — Plant Protection Quarantine, APHIS 81-52, September 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment, (OTA), U.S. Congress, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orden, David, and Donna Roberts, Eds., Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade. Proceeding of the International Trade Research Consortium, January 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedgley, D.E., “Managing migratory insect pests — a review,” International Journal of Pest Management, 39(1):3–12, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewett, Ray, “Texas Faces Crisis on Mexican Fruit Fly Program,” Citrograph, April 1987 p 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Donna, “Analyzing Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets: Challenges and Priorities,” Agribusiness, 15(3):335–354, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Donna, “Prelimary Assessment of the effects of the WTO agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary trade regulations,” Journal of International Economic Law, 1(3):377–405, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Donna, Timothy E. Josling, and David Orden. A Framework for Analyzing Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin No. 1876 (TB-1876). March 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Donna and David Orden. “Determinants of Technical Barriers to Trade: The Case of US Phytosanitary Restrictions on Mexican Avocados, 1972–1995,” eds. David Orden and Donna Roberts, Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade, The International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, Jerome B., “Economic Analysis of the Establishment of Medfly in California,” in David Zilberman and Jerome B. Siebert, Economic Perspectives on Pesticide Use in California, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, October, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, Jerome B., and Todd Cooper, “Embargo on California produce would cause revenue, job loss,” California Agriculture, 7–12, July-August, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sills, Joan, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, personal communication, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Fruit Fly Cooperative Control Program Draft Environmental Impact statement — 1999. Marketing and Regulatory Programs, APHIS, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, The Mediterranean Fruit Fly, Plant Protection and Quarantine, APHIS, May 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service APHIS FY 2001 REFERENCE BOOKhttp://www.aphis.usda.gov/bad/refbook2001/2001.

  • USDA APHIS, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service APHIS FY 2000 REFERENCE BOOKhttp://www.aphis.usda.gov:80/bad/refbook2000/FruitFly.pdf 2000

  • USDA NASS, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Citrus Fruits, Final Estimates 1992-97. Statistical Bulletin Number 961. August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo, Trang, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, personal communication, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo, Trang, Economic Analysis of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Program in Guatemala, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Charles L., and Charles L. Graham, eds. Exotic Plant Pests and North American Agriculture, Academic Press, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lynch, L. (2003). Migration of Exotic Pests: Phytosanitary Regulations and Cooperative Policies to Protect U.S. Ecosystems and Agricultural Interests. In: Batema, J.J., Fernandez, L., Carson, R.T. (eds) Both Sides of the Border. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47961-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47961-3_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7126-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47961-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics