Advertisement

Rethinking Characterizations of Beliefs

  • Fulvia Furinghetti
  • Erkki Pehkonen
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 31)

Abstract

In this chapter we consider beliefs and the related concepts of conceptions and knowledge. From a review of the literature in different fields we observe that there is a diversity of views and approaches in research on these subjects. We report on a small research project of our own attempting to clarify the understanding of beliefs among specialists in mathematics education. A panel of 18 mathematics educators participated in a panel that we termed “virtual”, since the participants communicated with us only by e-mail. We sent nine characterizations related to beliefs, selected from the literature, to the panelists, asked them to express their agreement or disagreement with the statements, and also asked each to give their own characterization of the term. The answers were analyzed, searching for the elements around which the concept of beliefs has developed along the years. We discuss issues on which there was agreement and disagreement and conjecture what lies behind the differences. As a final step we make some suggestions relating to characterization of the term belief and ways of dealing with it in future research.

Keywords

Mathematics Education Belief System Mathematics Learning Objective Knowledge Affective Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. (1979). Differences between belief systems and knowledge systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audi, R. (1988). Belief, justification, and knowledge. Belmot (CA): Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Bassarear, T. J. (1989). The interactive nature of cognition and affect in the learning of mathematics: two case studies. In C.A. Maher, G.A. Goldin, & R.B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the PME-NA-S Vol. 1 (pp. 3–10). Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. (1998). Exploring mathematical beliefs — the naturalistic approach. In M. Ahtee & E. Pehkonen (Eds.), Research methods in mathematics and science education (pp. 25–40). University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 185.Google Scholar
  5. Bottino, R. M., & Furinghetti, F. (1996). The emerging of teachers’ conceptions of new subjects inserted in mathematics programs: The case of informatics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooney, T. J., Shealy, B. E., & Arvold, B. (1998). Conceptualizing belief structures of preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 306–333.Google Scholar
  7. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  8. Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of mathematics education. Hampshire (U.K.): The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fennema, E., & Franke, L. M. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 47–164). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Freire, A. M., & Sanches, M. C. (1992). Elements for a typology of teachers’ conceptions of physics teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furinghetti, F. (1996). A theoretical framework for teachers’ conceptions. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs III. Proceedings of the MAVI-3 Workshop (pp. 19–25). University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 170.Google Scholar
  12. Gardiner, T. (1998). The art of knowing. The mathematical gazette, 82(495), 2–20.Google Scholar
  13. Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning in mathematics. In R. B. Davis & al. (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. JRME Monograph Number 4 (pp. 36–47). Reston (VA): NCTM.Google Scholar
  14. Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.Google Scholar
  15. Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19(1), 3–45.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, L. E. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. B. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 37–45). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Hasemann, K. (1987). Pupils’ individual concepts on fractions and the role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Articles on mathematics education (pp. 25–39). Department of Teacher Education. University of Helsinki. Research Report 55.Google Scholar
  18. Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and belief. Ithaca: Cornell U. P.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, D., Henderson, E., & Cooney, T. (1986). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and about teaching mathematics. In G. Lappan & R. Even (Eds.), Proceedings of PME-NA-8 (pp. 274–279). East Lansing (MI): Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, R. G. (1991). Teacher beliefs and practices: a square peg in a square hole. In R. G. Underhill (Ed.), Proceedings of PME-NA-13 (2) (pp. 119–125). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
  21. Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problem-solving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 75–88). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Lindgren, S. (1999). Plato, knowledge and mathematics education. In G. Philippou (Ed.), MAVI-8 Proceedings (pp. 73–78). Nicosia: University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
  23. Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions on functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 248–274.Google Scholar
  24. Mc Dowell, J. (1987). Plato, Theaetetus. (Translation). Oxford: Calrendon.Google Scholar
  25. McLeod, D. B. (1989). Beliefs, attitudes, and emotions: New views of affect in mathematics education. In D. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 245–258). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. McLeod. D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: a reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M.P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual of Reviews in Psychology, 44, 117–154.Google Scholar
  29. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.Google Scholar
  30. Paola, D. (1999). Communication et collaboration entre practiciens et chercheurs: étude ďun cas. F. Jacquet (Ed.), Proceedings of CIEAEM 50 (pp. 217–221). Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
  31. Pehkonen, E. (1994). On teachers’ beliefs and changing mathematics teaching. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 15(3/4), 177–209.Google Scholar
  32. Pehkonen, E. (1998). On the concept ‘mathematical belief’. In E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), The state-of-art in mathematics-related belief research. Results of the MAVI activities (pp. 37–72). University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 195.Google Scholar
  33. Ponte, J. P. (1994). Knowledge, beliefs, and conceptions in mathematics teaching and learning. In L. Bazzini (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Systematic Cooperation between Theory and Practice in Mathematics Education (pp. 169–177). Pavia: ISDAF.Google Scholar
  34. Rodd, M. M. (1997). Beliefs and their warrants in mathematics learning. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of PME 214 (pp. 64–71). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  35. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco (Ca): Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Ruffell, M., Mason, J., & Allen, B. (1998). Studying attitude to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saari, H. 1983. Koulusaavutusten affektiiviset oheissaavutukset. [Affective Consequences of School Achievement] Institute for Educational Research. Publications 348. University of Jyväskylä. [in Finnish].Google Scholar
  38. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando (FL.): Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition?. In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of the mathematical objects. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaw, K. L. (1989). Contrasts of teacher ideal and actual beliefs about mathematics understanding: Three case studies. Doctoral dissertation. Athens (GA): University of Georgia (unpublished).Google Scholar
  43. Silver, E. A. (1985). Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some under represented themes and directions. In E.A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: multiple research perspective (pp. 247–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  44. Stacey, K. (1991). Linking application and acquisition of mathematical ideas through problem solving. International Reviews in Mathematical Education (ZDM), 23, 8–14.Google Scholar
  45. Statt, D. A. (1990). The concise dictionary of psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Steffe, L. P. (1990). On the knowledge of mathematics teachers. In R.B. Davis et al. (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. JRME Monograph Number 4 (pp. 167–184). Reston, VA: NCTMGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In A. D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Törner, G., & Grigutsch, S. (1994). ‘Mathematische Weltbilder’ bei Studienanfängern — eine Erhebung. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 15(3/4), 211–251.Google Scholar
  49. Underbill, R. G. (1988). Mathematics learners’ beliefs: A review. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10 (1), 55–69.Google Scholar
  50. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fulvia Furinghetti
  • Erkki Pehkonen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations