Modeling the Mercury Cycle in the Mediterranean: Similarities and Differences with Conventional Air Pollution Modeling

  • G. Kallos
  • A. Voudouri
  • I. Pytharoulis
  • O. Kakaliagou

Keywords

Deposition Velocity Deposition Pattern Mercury Species Regional Atmospheric Modelling System Deep Trough 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Electric Power Research Institute technical report TR-107695, 1996: Mercury in the environment-A research update. Final report, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Kallos, G., V., Kotroni, K., Lagouvardos, M., Varinou, M., Uliasz, and A., Papadopoulos 1997a: Transport and Transformation of air pollutants from Europe to East Mediterranean Region (T-TRAPEM). Final Report Athens, Greece, pp.298Google Scholar
  3. Kallos, G., S. Nickovic, A. Papadopoulos, D. Jovic, O. Kakaliagou, N. Misirlis, L. Boukas, N. Mimikou, G. Sakellaridis, J. Papageorgiou, E. Anadranistakis and M. Manousakis 1997b: The Regional weather forecasting system SKIRON. Proceedings of the Symposium on Regional Weather Prediction on Parallel Computer Environments, 15–17 October 1997, Athens, Greece. 109–122.Google Scholar
  4. Kallos, G., V., Kotroni, K., Lagouvardos, A., Papadopoulos, M., Varinou, O., Kakaliagou, M., Luria, M., Peleg, A., Wanger, and M., Uliasz, 1998: Temporal and spatial scales for transport and transformation processes in the eastern mediterranean Proc. of the 22st NATO/CCMS Int. Techn. Meeting on Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application, 2–6 June, Clermont-Ferrand, France.Google Scholar
  5. Kallos G., Kakaliagou O., Voudouri A., Pytharoulis I., Pirrone N., Forlano L., and J. Pachyna, 2000: Modelling of the mercury cycle in the atmosphere. Proceedings, 24th ITM of NATO/CCMS on Air Pollution Modelling and its Application, 15–19 May 2000, Boulder, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Pai, P., Karamchandani, P., and Seigneur, C., 1997: Simulation of the regional atmospheric transport and fate of mercury using a comprehensive Eulerian model. Atm. Env., 31, 2717–2732Google Scholar
  7. Pielke, R. A., Cotton W. R., Walko R. L., Tremback C. J., Lyons W. A., Grasso L. D., Nicholls M E., Moran M. D., Wesley D. A., Lee T. J., and J. H. Copeland, 1992: A comprehensive meteorological modelling system-RAMS. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 49, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pirrone N., and G. J. Keeler, 1995: Numerical Modelling of Gas-Particle Partitioning of Atmospheric Mercury in Urban Areas. In Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), October 9–13, 1995, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  9. Pirrone N., Keeler G. J., and T. M. Holsen, 1995: Dry Deposition of Trace Elements over Lake Michigan: A Hybrid-Receptor Deposition Modelling Approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 29, 2112–2122.Google Scholar
  10. Slinn, S. A., and W. G. N. Slinn., 1981: Modelling of Atmospheric Particulate Deposition to Natural Waters. In: Atmospheric Pollutants in Natural Waters, S.J. Eisenreich, Ed., Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI. pp. 22–53.Google Scholar
  11. Sehmel G. A., 1980, Particle and gas dry deposition: A Review. Atm. Env., 14, pp. 983–1011.Google Scholar
  12. Willams, R. M., 1982: A model for the dry deposition of particles to natural water surfaces. Atmos. Environ., 1933–1938.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kallos
    • 1
  • A. Voudouri
    • 1
  • I. Pytharoulis
    • 1
  • O. Kakaliagou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied PhysicsUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations