Using Media Reports of Science Research in Pupils’ Evaluation of Evidence
With development of’ scientific literacy’ in mind, this classroom-based study explored skills of evidence evaluation of 15–16 year olds, through their interpretation of media reports of science research. Results indicate that most pupils can recognise research claims and evidence but are less able to recognise limitations of evidence and interactions with theory. They can offer sensible suggestions for generation of additional evidence. There appears to be limited pupil development across the one year of the study. More emphasis on evidence-theory interaction may aid pupil understanding of the scientific enterprise.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Biggs, J.B.& Collis K.F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Donnelly, J.F., Buchan, A.S., Jenkins, E.W., Laws, P.M., & Welford, A.G. (1996). Investigations by Order. Policy, curriculum and science teachers’ work under the Education Reform Act. Driffield UK: Studies in Education.Google Scholar
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Giere, R.N. (1991). Understanding Scientific Reasoning Fort Worth TX: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, E (1997). Towards a functional public understanding of science. In R. Levinson & J. Thomas, Eds.; Science Today (pp. 137–150). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Korpan, C.A., Bisanz, G.L. Bisanz, J. & Henderson, J.M. (1997). Assessing literacy in science: evaluation of scientific news briefs. Science Education 81, 515–532.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London, School of Education.Google Scholar
- Norris, S.P. & Phillips, L.M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31,9, 947–967.Google Scholar