Skip to main content
View expanded cover

New Learning pp 209–225Cite as

Process-oriented Teaching

  • Chapter

Keywords

  • Learning Style
  • Learning Orientation
  • Constructive Learning
  • Learning Function
  • Thinking Activity

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47614-2_11
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-306-47614-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beaty, L., Gibbs, G., & Morgan, A. (1997). Learning orientatioas and study contracts. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd edition) (pp. 72–86). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beijaard, D., & De Vries, Y. (1997). Building expertise: a process perspective on the development or change of teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20, 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195–200.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bolhuis, S., & Kluvers, C. (1997, August). Learning theory: an integrative perspective as a fundament for process-based instruction. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C., Van den Bos, K. (1997). Improving text comprehension strategies in reading and listening. Learning and Instruction, 8, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Vye, N. Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381–413). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1990). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathemathantics. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, S.N. Bennett & H.F. Friedrich (Eds. J, Learning and Instruction: European research in an international context. Volume 2.2 (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A, Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction-Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., & Snow, R.E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edition) (pp. 605–629). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F. (1995). Process-oriented instruction: some considerations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler-Brenstein, E., Schmeck, R.R., & Hetherington, J. (1996). An individual difference perspective on student diversity. Higher Education, 31, 73–96.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, P.J. (1996). Studaxology: The expertise students need to be effective in higher education. Higher Education, 31, 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1991). Instructional design for meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 20, 289–310.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F.A.J. (1993). Two modes of reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 317–326.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, S. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education: Effects of instruction on preservice teachers’ early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K. (1997). Explorations of constructive processes in student learning. Doctoral thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K., & Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction-How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 351–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowyck, J., & Elen, J. (1993). Transitions in the theoretical foundation of instructional design. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments far constructive learning (pp. 213–230). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, R., Valcke, M., Poelmans, P., & Daal, M. (1996). Functions, use and effects of embedded support devices in printed distance learning materials. Learning and Instruction, 6, 77–93.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B.L. (1991). Motivation and lifelong learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. (1988). Course design and students’ approaches to study. In D. Sewart & J.S. Daniel (Eds.), Developing distance education, (pp. 315–318). Oslo: International Council for Distance Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterheert, I. (1998, August). Learning to teach: Individual differences in the process. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the EARLI-SIGs ‘Higher Education’ and ‘Teaching and Teacher Education’, Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching. Volume 1 (pp. 35–67). Greenwich, CO: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemersma, F., & Veugelers, W. (1997, August). Necessary conditions for implementing process-oriented instruction: six case studies. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edition) (pp. 376–391). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics. Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 142–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schatteman, A., Carette, E., Couder, J., & Eisendrath, H. (1997). Understanding the effects of a process-oriented instruction in the first year of university by investigating learning style characteristics. Educational Psychology, 17, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, E.J., & Weisberg-Benchell, J.A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. In C.B. McCormick, G.E. Miller & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 33–63). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuell, T.J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 726–764). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.R.J. (1993). Constructive learning: The role of the learner. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 291–314). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.R.J. (1997). From romanticism to practice in learning. Lifelong learning in Europe, 1, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theophilides, C. (1997, August). Freshmen students’ reactions to constructivist approaches to learning and to process-oriented instruction. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkel, H.J.M., Nuy, H.J.P., & Geerligs, T. (1995). The influence of progress tests and block tests on study behavior. Instructional Science, 22, 317–333.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vermetten, Y.J., Vermunt, J.D., & Lodewijks, H.G. (1999). A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education-Different viewpoints towards development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 221–242.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 325–349.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Lasure, S., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems. A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195–229.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S.E. (1991). Modeling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students’ learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 319–336.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., McGill, T., & Pears, H. (1995). Implementing process-based instruction in regular university teaching: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E.D., & McCombs, B.L. (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles in practice: Designs for distance education. Educational Technology, 35(3), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vermunt, J., Verschaffel, L. (2000). Process-oriented Teaching. In: Simons, RJ., van der Linden, J., Duffy, T. (eds) New Learning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6296-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47614-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive