New Learning pp 209-225 | Cite as

Process-oriented Teaching

  • Jan Vermunt
  • Lieven Verschaffel

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beaty, L., Gibbs, G., & Morgan, A. (1997). Learning orientatioas and study contracts. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd edition) (pp. 72–86). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beijaard, D., & De Vries, Y. (1997). Building expertise: a process perspective on the development or change of teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20, 243–255.Google Scholar
  4. Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolhuis, S., & Kluvers, C. (1997, August). Learning theory: an integrative perspective as a fundament for process-based instruction. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  6. Brand-Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C., Van den Bos, K. (1997). Improving text comprehension strategies in reading and listening. Learning and Instruction, 8, 63–82.Google Scholar
  7. Bransford, J.D., Vye, N. Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381–413). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, R.E. (1990). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathemathantics. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, S.N. Bennett & H.F. Friedrich (Eds. J, Learning and Instruction: European research in an international context. Volume 2.2 (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, A, Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction-Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Corno, L., & Snow, R.E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edition) (pp. 605–629). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  11. De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30, 37–46.Google Scholar
  12. De Jong, F. (1995). Process-oriented instruction: some considerations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 317–323.Google Scholar
  13. Geisler-Brenstein, E., Schmeck, R.R., & Hetherington, J. (1996). An individual difference perspective on student diversity. Higher Education, 31, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.Google Scholar
  15. Janssen, P.J. (1996). Studaxology: The expertise students need to be effective in higher education. Higher Education, 31, 117–141.Google Scholar
  16. Kember, D. (1991). Instructional design for meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 20, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korthagen, F.A.J. (1993). Two modes of reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krause, S. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education: Effects of instruction on preservice teachers’ early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 130–138.Google Scholar
  19. Lonka, K. (1997). Explorations of constructive processes in student learning. Doctoral thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  20. Lonka, K., & Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction-How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 351–368.Google Scholar
  21. Lowyck, J., & Elen, J. (1993). Transitions in the theoretical foundation of instructional design. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments far constructive learning (pp. 213–230). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Martens, R., Valcke, M., Poelmans, P., & Daal, M. (1996). Functions, use and effects of embedded support devices in printed distance learning materials. Learning and Instruction, 6, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277–300.Google Scholar
  24. McCombs, B.L. (1991). Motivation and lifelong learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  25. Morgan, A. (1988). Course design and students’ approaches to study. In D. Sewart & J.S. Daniel (Eds.), Developing distance education, (pp. 315–318). Oslo: International Council for Distance EducationGoogle Scholar
  26. Oosterheert, I. (1998, August). Learning to teach: Individual differences in the process. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the EARLI-SIGs ‘Higher Education’ and ‘Teaching and Teacher Education’, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching. Volume 1 (pp. 35–67). Greenwich, CO: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  28. Riemersma, F., & Veugelers, W. (1997, August). Necessary conditions for implementing process-oriented instruction: six case studies. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.Google Scholar
  30. Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edition) (pp. 376–391). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics. Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 142–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schatteman, A., Carette, E., Couder, J., & Eisendrath, H. (1997). Understanding the effects of a process-oriented instruction in the first year of university by investigating learning style characteristics. Educational Psychology, 17, 111–125.Google Scholar
  34. Short, E.J., & Weisberg-Benchell, J.A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. In C.B. McCormick, G.E. Miller & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 33–63). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Shuell, T.J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 726–764). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Simons, P.R.J. (1993). Constructive learning: The role of the learner. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 291–314). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Simons, P.R.J. (1997). From romanticism to practice in learning. Lifelong learning in Europe, 1, 8–15.Google Scholar
  38. Theophilides, C. (1997, August). Freshmen students’ reactions to constructivist approaches to learning and to process-oriented instruction. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  39. Van Berkel, H.J.M., Nuy, H.J.P., & Geerligs, T. (1995). The influence of progress tests and block tests on study behavior. Instructional Science, 22, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vermetten, Y.J., Vermunt, J.D., & Lodewijks, H.G. (1999). A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education-Different viewpoints towards development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vermunt, J.D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vermunt, J.D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.Google Scholar
  44. Vermunt, J.D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Lasure, S., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems. A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Volet, S.E. (1991). Modeling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students’ learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Volet, S., McGill, T., & Pears, H. (1995). Implementing process-based instruction in regular university teaching: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 385–400.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, E.D., & McCombs, B.L. (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles in practice: Designs for distance education. Educational Technology, 35(3), 32–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Vermunt
    • 1
  • Lieven Verschaffel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational Development and ResearchMaastricht UniversityMD MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Center for Instructional Psychology and TechnologyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations