Conclusion
Many evaluators already implement the principles we explicate here without any urging from us. They have developed their own approaches, their own intuitions, and their own robust senses of justice. Nonetheless, such principles are too important to leave to chance or intuition all the time. It may help to have a justification and checklist to remind evaluators caught in the complexities of difficult evaluations what evaluation in democratic societies should aim for: deliberative democracy.
If we look beyond the conduct of individual studies by individual evaluators, we can see the outlines of evaluation as an influential societal institution, one which can be vital to the development of democratic societies. Amidst claims and counter-claims of the mass media, amidst public relations and advertising, evaluation can be an institution that stands apart, reliable for the accuracy and integrity of its claims. And it needs a set of explicit principles to guide its own practice and test its intuitions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
House, E.R., Howe, K.R. (2000). Deliberative Democratic Evaluation in Practice. In: Stufflebeam, D.L., Madaus, G.F., Kellaghan, T. (eds) Evaluation Models. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7884-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47559-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive