Skip to main content

Discretionary, Non-discretionary and Categorical Variables

  • Chapter
Data Envelopment Analysis

Summary of Chapter 7

In this chapter we expanded the ability of DEA to deal with variables that are not under managerial control but nevertheless affect performances in ways that need to be taken into account when effecting evaluations. Non-discretionary and categorical variables represent two of the ways in which conditions beyond managerial control can be taken into account in a DEA analysis. Uses of upper or lower bounds constitute yet another approach and, of course, these approaches can be combined in a variety of ways. Finally, uses of Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistics were introduced for testing results in a nonparametric manner when ranking can be employed.

Illustrative examples were supplied along with algorithms that can be used either separately or with the computer code DEA-Solver. We also showed how to extend DEA in order to deal with production possibility sets (there may be more than one) that are not convex. Finally we provided examples to show how new results can be secured when DEA is applied to such sets to test the efficiency of organization forms (and other types of activities) in ways that were not otherwise available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R.D. Banker and R. Morey (1986a) “Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs,” Operations Research 34(4), pp.513–521

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, J.J. Rousseau and J. Semple (1987), “Data Envelopment Analysis and Axiomatic Notions of Efficiency and Reference Sets,” CCS Research Report 558 (Austin, Texas: University of Texas, Graduate School of Business, Center for Cybernetic Studies, Austin, Texas 78712).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.F. Fama and M.C. Jensen (1983a) “Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics 26, pp.301–325. See also Fama and Jensen (1983b) “Agency Problems and Residual Claims,” Journal of Law and Economics 26, pp.327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.L. Brockett, W.W. Cooper, J.J. Rousseau and Y. Wang (1998) “DEA Evaluations of the Efficiency of Organizational Forms and Distribution Systems in the U.S. Property and Liability Insurance Industry,” International Journal of System Science 29, pp.1235–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Solvency, defined as an ability to meet claims, for example, played a critically important role in Brockett et al. but not in the Fama-Jensen study. See P.L. Brockett, W.W. Cooper, L. Golden, J.J. Rousseau and Y. Wang “Evaluating Solvency and Efficiency Performances by U.S. Property-Liability Insurance Companies,” Journal of Risk and Insurance (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Mann-Whitney statistic does not require equal sample size. See E.L. Lehman (1979) Nonparametrization: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks (New York: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.L. Adolphson, G.C. Cornia, L.C. Walters, “A Unified Framework for Classifying DEA Models,” Operational Research’ 90, edited by H.E. Bradley, Pergamon Press, pp.647–657 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Tone (1993), “On DEA Models,” (in Japanese) Communications of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 38, pp.34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.D. Banker and R.C. Morey (1986b), “The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 32(12), pp. 1613–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. A. Kamakura (1988) “A Note on The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science 34(10), pp.1273–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.J. Rousseau and J. Semple (1993) “Categorical Outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science 39(3), pp.384–386.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Tone (1997), “DEA with Controllable Category Levels,” in Proceedings of the 1997 Spring National Conference of the Operations Research Society of Japan, pp. 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Tone (1993), Data Envelopment Analysis (in Japanese) (Tokyo: JUSE Press, Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1981) “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through,” Management Science 27, pp.668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.L. Brockett and B. Golany (1996) “Using Rank Statistics for Determining Programmatic Efficiency Differences in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science 42, pp.466–472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2002). Discretionary, Non-discretionary and Categorical Variables. In: Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47541-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47541-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8693-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47541-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics