Infanoid

A Babybot that Explores the Social Environment
  • Hideki Kozima
Part of the Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations book series (MASA, volume 3)

Abstract

We are building an infant-like robot,Infanoid, to investigate the underlying mechanisms of social intelligence that will allow it to communicate with human beings and participate in human social activities. We propose an ontogenetic model of social intelligence, which is being implemented in Infanoid: how the robot acquires communicative behavior through interaction with the social environment, especially with human caregivers. The model has three stages: (1) the acquisition of intentionality, which enables the robot to make use of certain methods for obtaining goals, (2) identification with others, which enables it to indirectly experience others’ behavior, and (3) social communication, in which the robot understands others’ behavior by ascribing it the intention that best explains the behavior.

Keywords

Intelligent Agent Joint Attention Mirror Neuron Social Intelligence Intentional Stance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Baron-Cohen. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Baron-Cohen. Is there a normal phase of synaesthesia in development? Psyche, 2(27), 1996. http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/psyche-2-27-baroncohen.html.
  3. [3]
    R.A. Brooks, C. Breazeal, M. Marjanovic, B. Scassellati, and M. Williamson. The Cog project: building a humanoid robot. In C.L. Nehaniv, editor, Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1562, pages 52–87. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Byrne. The Thinking Ape: Evolutionary Origins of Intelligence. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D.C. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Meltzoff and M.K. Moore. Persons and representation: why infant imitation is important for theories of human development. In J. Nadel and G. Butterworth, editors, Imitation in Infancy, pages 9–35. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Rizzolatti and M.A. Arbib. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21: 188–194, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Sperber and D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Tomasello.The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Zlatev. The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Minds and Machines, 11: 155–195, 2001.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideki Kozima

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations