Advertisement

Designing Sociable Machines

Lessons Learned
  • Cynthia Breazeal
Part of the Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations book series (MASA, volume 3)

Abstract

Sociable machines are a blend of art, science, and engineering. We highlight how insights from these disciplines have helped us to address a few key design issues for building expressive humanoid robots that interact with people in a social manner.

Keywords

Facial Expression Humanoid Robot Intelligent Agent Human Infant Attention System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C. Breazeal and B. Scassellati. A Context-Dependent Attention System for a Social Robot. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI99), pages 1146–1151, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Breazeal and L. Aryananda. Recognition of Affective Communicative Intent in Robot-Directed Speech. In Proceedings of the First IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2000), Cambridge, MA, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Breazeal. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Bullowa, editor. Before Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Cahn. Generating Expression in Synthesized Speech. S.M. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Media Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Cole. About Face. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Dautenhahn. The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop. in Applied Artificial Intelligence, 12(7–8): 573–617, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt. Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive movements. In R. Hinde, editor, Nonverbal Communication, pages 297–311. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Fernald. Intonation and communicative intent in mother’s speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development, 60: 1497–1510, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    I. Murray and L. Arnott. Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. Journal Acoustical Society of America, 93(2): 1097–1108, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    F. Parke and K. Waters. Computer Facial Animation. A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Smith and H. Scott. A Componential Approach to the Meaning of Facial Expressions. In J. Russell and J.M. Fernández-Dols, editors, The Psychology of Facial Expression, pages 229–254. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. Thomas and O. Johnston. Disney Animation: The Illusion of Life. Abbeville Press, New York, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia Breazeal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations