Abstract
Recent developments on the density functional theory (DFT) of lattice fermion models are reviewed. Formally exact, self-consistent equations are derived for the singleparticle density matrix γ ij that involve derivatives of the interaction-energy functional W[γ] and fractional occupations of natural orbitals η kσ . The dependence of the correlation energy functional E c (γ12) — W - E HF on the nearest-neighbors (NN) density matrix γ12 is analyzed. A pseudo-universal scaling behavior of εC =E C /E HF as a function of g12 = (γ12 – γ∞ 12) / (γ0 12 - γ∞ 12) is revealed, where γ0 12 (γ∞ 12) stands for the uncorrelated (strongly correlated) value of γ12. Based on exact dimer results and on scaling properties of E c(γ12), a simple, explicit approximation to W(γ12) is proposed for the Hubbard model. Ground-state energies and charge-excitation gaps of one- and two-dimensional lattices are obtained, in remarkable agreement with available exact results or accurate numerical simulations. The scope of DFT is thereby extended to the limit of strong electron correlations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B 136, 864 (1964).
W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. A 140, 1133 (1965).
R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford University, New York, 1989).
R. M. Dreizler and E. K. U. Gross, Density Functional Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1990).
U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 5, 1629 (1972).
D. C. Langreth and M. J. Mehl, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1809 (1983)
A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988)
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996) and references therein.
W. E. Picket, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 433 (1989)
O. K. Andersen, H. L. Skriver, H. Nohl, and B. Johansson, Pure Appl. Chem. 52, 93 (1979)
K. Tekakura, A. R. Williams, T. Oguchi, and J. Kübler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1830 (1984).
R. Pariser and R. G. Parr, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 466 (1953)
R. Pariser and R. G. Parr, J. Chem. Phys. 21 767 (1953)
J. A. Pople, Trans. Faraday Soc. 49, 1375 (1953).
P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961).
J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 276, 238 (1963)
J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 281, 401 (1964)
J. Kanamori, Prog. Theo. Phys. 30, 275 (1963)
M. C. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159 (1963).
See, for instance, P. Fulde, Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
O. Gunnarsson and K. Schönhammer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1968 (1986)
K. Schönhammer and O. Gunnarsson, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3128 (1988)
A. Schindlmayr and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10427 (1995).
K. Schönhammer, O. Gunnarsson, and R. M. Noack, Phys. Rev. B 52, 2504 (1995).
T. L. Gilbert, Phys. Rev. B 12, 2111 (1975).
R. A. Donnelly and R. G. Parr, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 4431 (1978)
R. A. Donnell, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 28744 (1979). See also, Ref. 3, p. 213, and references therein.
S. M. Valone, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 1344
S. M. Valone, J. Chem. Phys. 4653 (1980).
M. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 6062 (1979).
R. López-Sandoval and G. M. Pastor, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1764 (2000)
A single-particle density matrix ɤij is said to be pure-state N-representable if an TV-particle state |∑) exists, such that ɤij = ψ ∑ | ĉ†σ†i† σj† |∑. for all i and j.
C. Lanczos, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 45, 255 (1950)
B. N. Parlett, The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem (Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, 1980)
J. K. Collum and R. A. Willoughby, Lanczos Algorithms for Large Symmetric Eigenvalue Computations (Birkhauser, Boston, 1985), Vol. I.
L. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1445 (1968).
H. Shiba, Phys. Rev. B 6, 930 (1972).
In the presence of degeneracies in the single-particle spectrum of finite systems one may find that the minimum of W[ɤij] does not correspond to a single Slater determinant, and that W(ɤ12 -> ɤ012) < EHf. Such a behavior is observed, for example, in rings with Na = Ne = Am. This is a finite-size effect which decreases with increasing Na.
In the nonmagnetic case the Hartree-Fock energy of the Hubbard model is EKF/Na = (U/4)(Ne/Na)2 for Ne even and EHF/Na = (U/4)(Ne/Na)2[1 -(1/Ne)2] for Ne odd. Notice that in this model the difference between EH. and the Hartree energy EH/Na = (U/2)(Ne/Na)2 is only the self interaction.
J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4403 (1985).
R. López-Sandoval and G. M. Pastor, to be published.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lopez-Sandoval, R., Pastor, G.M. (2001). Density Functional Theory of the Lattice Fermion Model. In: Morán-López, J.L. (eds) Physics of Low Dimensional Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47111-6_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47111-6_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0571-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47111-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive