Advertisement

Verbal Working Memory Capacity and On-Line Sentence Processing Efficiency in the Elderly

Chapter
  • 232 Downloads

Keywords

Work Memory Capacity Span Task Sentence Type Sentence Processing Reading Span 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley, A., Logie, R. & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 119–131.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, S. (1991). Sensitivity to syntactic violations across the age span: Evidence from a word monitoring task. Journal of Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 5, 317–328.Google Scholar
  3. Berwick, R. C., & Weinberg, A. (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: language use and acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Botwinick, J., & Storandt, M. (1974). Memory, related functions and age. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  5. Caplan, D. & Waters, G. S. (in press a). Verbal working memory capacity and language comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Caplan, D. & Waters, G.S. (in press b). Issues regarding general and domain-specific resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075–1122). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1993). The minimalist program, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. InF Klix, & H. Hagendorf (Ed.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daneman, M. & Tardiff, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 491–508). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, C. A., & Ball, H. E. (1989). Effects of age on comprehension of complex sentences in adulthood. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 143–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Emery, O. B. (1985). Language and aging. Experimental Aging Research (Monograph), 11, 3–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feier, C.D., & Gerstman, L.J. (1980). Sentence comprehension abilities throughout the adult life span. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 722–728.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferreira, F., & Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language? In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 33–56). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks Jr., P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haarmann, H.J., Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1997). Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A Computational approach. Brain and Language, 59, 76–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 277–287.Google Scholar
  22. Kemper, S. (1987a). Life-span changes in syntactic complexity. Journal of gerontology, 42, 323–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemper, S. (1987b). Syntactic complexity and elderly adults’ prose recall. Experimental Aging Research, 13, 47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemper, S. (1988). Geriatric psycholinguistics: Syntactic limitations of oral and written language. In L. L. Light, & D. M. Burke (Ed.), Language, memory, and aging (pp. 58–76). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kemper, S. (1992). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik, & T. A. Salthouse (Ed.), Handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 213–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Kemper, S., & Rash, S. (1988). Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kemper, S., Kynette, D., Rash, S., O’Brien, K., & Sprott, R. (1989). Life-span changes to adults’ language: Effects of memory and genre. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 49–66.Google Scholar
  28. Kempler, S., Rash, S., Kynette, D., & Norman, S. (1990). Telling stories: The structure of adults’ narratives. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 205–228.Google Scholar
  29. Kemtes, K. A., & Kemper, S. (1996). Younger and older adults’ working memory and on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Poster presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  30. King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Light, L. L. (1990). Interactions between memory and language in old age. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd edition) (pp. 275–290). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  32. MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Norman, S., Kemper, S., Kynette, D., Cheung, H., & Anagnopoulos, C. (1991). Syntactic complexity and adults’ running memory span. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 346–351.Google Scholar
  35. Obler, L. K., Fein, D., Nicholas, M., & Albert, M. L. (1991). Auditory comprehension and aging: Decline in syntactic processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 433–452.Google Scholar
  36. Salthouse, T. A. (1988). The role of processing resources in cognitive aging. In M. L. Howe, & C. J. Brainerd (Ed.), Cognitive development in adulthood (pp. 185–239). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Talland, G. A. (1965). Three estimates of the word span and their stability over the adult years. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 301–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tirre, W., & Pena, C. (1992). Investigation of functional working memory in the reading span test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 462–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., & Stine, E. A. L. (1991). Speech-processing capacity in young and older adults: A dual-task study. Psychology and Aging, 6, 3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner, M. & Engle, R.W. (1986). Working memory. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 30, 1273–1277.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, M. & Engle, R.W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waldstein, R., & Baum, S. (1992). The influence of syntactic and semantic context on word monitoring latencies in normal aging. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 6, 217–222.Google Scholar
  43. Waters, G.S., & Caplan, D. (submitted). Verbal working memory capacity and on-line sentence processing efficiency in college students.Google Scholar
  44. Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996a). Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. Memory and Cognition, 24, 342–355.Google Scholar
  45. Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996b). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51–79.Google Scholar
  46. Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996c). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: A reply to Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103, 761–772.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Waters, G., Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Working memory and written sentence comprehension. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 531–555). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Wingfield, A., & Brownell, H. (1995). The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 165–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations