Advertisement

Discourse Processing and Aging: Resource Allocation As a Limiting Factor

Chapter
  • 223 Downloads

Keywords

Serial Position Reading Time Secondary Task Distance Effect Situation Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1984a). A structure and meaning based classification of lexical categories. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 43, 21–57.Google Scholar
  2. Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1984b). The word-by-word reading paradigm: An experimental and theoretical approach. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some qualitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 56–70.Google Scholar
  4. Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative models. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams, C. (1991). Qualitative age differences in memory for text: A life-span developmental perspective. Psychology and Aging, 6, 323–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams, C., Labouvie-Vief, G., Hobart, C. J., & Dorosz, M. (1990). Adult age group differences in story recall style. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, P17–27.Google Scholar
  7. Adams, C., Smith, M. C., Nyquist, L., & Perlmutter, M. (1997). Adult age-group differences in recall for the literal and interpretive meanings of narrative text. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P187–P195.Google Scholar
  8. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M.M Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bashore, T. R., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (1997). The decline of cognitive processing speed in old age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Britton, B. K., Graesser, A. C., Glynn, S. M., Hamilton, T., & Penland, M. (1983). Use of cognitive capacity in reading: Effects of some content features of text. Discourse Processes, 6, 39–57.Google Scholar
  11. Britton, B. K., Holdredge, T. S., Curry, C., & Westbrook, R. D. (1979). Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 262–270.Google Scholar
  12. Britton, B., & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan, J., & Luszcz, M. A. (1996). Speed of information processing as a mediator between age and free-recall performance. Psychology and Aging, 11, 3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1989). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Chiesi, H., Spilich, G., & Voss, J. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chinen, A. (1989). In the ever after. Wilmette, IL: Chiron.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1981). Memory for discourse in old age. Discourse Processes, 4, 253–265.Google Scholar
  18. Craik, F. I. M., & Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). A Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters’ emotional states? Cognition and Emotion, 6, 89–111.Google Scholar
  22. Haberlandt, K. (1984). Components of sentence and word reading times. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 219–251). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Haberlandt, K., & Graesser, A. C. (1989). Buffering new information during reading. Discourse Processes, 12, 479–494.Google Scholar
  24. Haberlandt, K. F., Graesser, A. C., Schneider, N. J., & Kiely, J. (1986). Effects of task and new arguments on word reading times. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartley, J. T., Stojack, C. C., Mushaney, T. J., Annon, T. A. K., & Lee, D. W. (1994). Reading speed and prose memory in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 9, 216–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jagacinski, R. J., Liao, M., & Fayyad, E. A. (1995). Generalized slowing in sidusoidal tracking in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10, 8–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Wooley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.Google Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Kemper, S. (1992). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 213–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. M. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.Google Scholar
  35. Knight, G. P. (1984). A survey of some important techniques and issues in multiple regression. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research. (pp. 13–30). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Light, L. L., & Capps, J. L. (1986). Comprehension of pronouns in younger and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 22, 580–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, L. M. S. (in preparation). The effects of real-world knowledge on text processing among older adults.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, L. M. S., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (1998). Aging and the effects of knowledge on on-line reading strategies. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 53B, P223–P233.Google Scholar
  41. Morrow, D. G., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Leirer, V. O., Andrassy, J. M., & Kahn, J. (1997). The role of reader age and focus of attention in creating situation models from narratives. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P73–P80.Google Scholar
  42. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myerson, J., Hale, S., Wagstaff, D., Poon, L. W., & Smith, G. A. (1990). The information loss model: A mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing. Psychological Review, 97, 475–487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Radvansky, G., Gerard, L., Zacks, R., & Hasher, L. (1990). Younger and older adults’ use of mental models as representations for text materials. Psychology and Aging, 5, 209–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Radvansky, G. A., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Narrative comprehension and aging: The fact of completed goal information. Psychology and Aging, 13, 69–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ratner, H., Schell, D., Crimmins, A., Mittelman, D., & Baldinelli, L. (1987). Changes in adults’ prose recall: Aging or cognitive demand? Developmental Psychology, 23, 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salthouse, T. A. (1988a). Resource-reduction interpretations of cognitive aging. Developmental Review, 8, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salthouse, T. A. (1988b). The role of processing resources in cognitive aging. In M. L. Howe & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive development in adulthood (Vol. Springer-Verlag, pp. 185–239): New York.Google Scholar
  50. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Schaie, K. W. (1996). Intellectual development in adulthood. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (Fourth edition) (pp. 266–286). Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Shah, R., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (1987). What is the point of facilitation? The loci of knowledge-based facilitation in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soederberg, L. M., & Stine, E. A. L. (1995). Activation of emotion information in text among younger and older adults. Journal of Adult Development, 2, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sommers, M. S. (1996). The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition. Psychology and Aging, 11, 333–341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Spilich, G., Vesonder, G., Chiesi, H., & Voss, J. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stine, E. A. L. (1990). On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 68–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Stine, E. A. L., Cheung, H., & Henderson, D. T. (1995). Adult age differences in the on-line processing of new concepts in discourse. Aging and Cognition, 2, 1–18.Google Scholar
  59. Stine, E. A. L., & Hindman, J. (1994). Age differences in reading time allocation for propositionally dense sentences. Aging and Cognition, 1, 2–16.Google Scholar
  60. Stine, E. A. L., Soederberg, L. M., & Morrow, D. G. (1996). Language and discourse processing through adulthood. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. M. Hess (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition in adulthood and aging (pp. 255–290). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  61. Stine, E. A. L., & Wingfield, A. (1987). Levels upon levels: Predicting age differences in text recall. Experimental Aging Research, 13, 179–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stine, E. A. L., & Wingfield, A. (1990). The assessment of qualitative age differences in discourse processing. In T. M. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 33–92). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  63. Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Loveless, M. K., & Soederberg, L. M. (1996). Resource allocation in on-line reading by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 11, 475–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tun, P. A. (1989). Age differences in processing expository and narrative texts. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44, P9–P15.Google Scholar
  65. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Voss, J., Vesonder, G., & Spilich, G. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1995). Compensatory processes in reading. In R. A. Dixon & L. Bäckman (Eds.), Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gains (pp. 275–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  68. Wingfield, A., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (in press). Language and speech. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (Second edition). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  69. Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1994). Contributions of working memory and evaluation and regulation of understanding to adults’ recall of texts. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, P201–P212.Google Scholar
  70. Zwann, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933.Google Scholar
  71. Zwann, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995a). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.Google Scholar
  72. Zwann, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995b). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.Google Scholar
  73. Zwann, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations