Advertisement

Brain Stem Death: A United Kingdom Anaesthetist’s View

  • David J. Hill
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 66)

Conclusion

For more than twenty years, so-called “brain death” in the United Kingdom has been a misnomer. Now it is recognized that this condition should be called “brain stem death” because it is only the brain stem that is tested. Such tests are incomplete and do not determine the absence of all activity in the brain stem. It is agreed that they do not exclude activity in the higher parts of the brain. Patients certified to be brain stem dead are still responsive, whether by spinal reflexes only or not, and there is no agreement on the need for anesthesia. Very little of this controversial situation is public knowledge, and consent may be poorly informed. There is a serious shortage of organs for transplantation, and procedures advocated to increase the supply are directed towards compulsion rather than increasing information.

There are undoubted benefits for some patients from organ transplantation. As so often, the ends are laudable, but the means that have to be employed to achieve those ends are dubious.

Keywords

Brain Stem British Medical Journal Brain Death Persistent Vegetative State Spinal Reflex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. American Neurological Committee on Ethical Affairs: 1993, ‘Persistent vegetative state,’ Annals of Neurology, 33, 386–390.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, K. et al.: 1996, ‘Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state; Retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit,’ British Medical Journal, 313, 13–16.Google Scholar
  3. Barelli A., et al.: 1990, ‘Do brain stem auditory evoked potentials detect the actual cessation of cerebral functions in brain dead patients?’ Critical Care Medicine,18, 322–323.Google Scholar
  4. Britton, T.C.: 1997, ‘Persistent vegetative state,’ Lancet, 350, 1324.Google Scholar
  5. Chandler, J.M. and Brilli R.J.:1991, ‘Brainstem encephalitis imitating brain death,’ Critical Care Medicine, 19, 977–979.Google Scholar
  6. Coad, N.R., Byrne, A.J.:1990, ‘Guilain-Barre syndrome mimicking brainstem death,’ Anesthesia, 45, 456–457.Google Scholar
  7. Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the UK: 1976, ‘Diagnosis of brain death,’ British Medical Journal, 2 (6045), 1187–1188.Google Scholar
  8. Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the UK: 1979, ‘Memorandum on the diagnosis of death,’ British Medical Journal, 1 (6159), 332.Google Scholar
  9. Cushing, H.: 1902, ‘some experimental and clinical observations concerning states of increased intracranial tension,’ American Journal of Medical Science, 124, 375–400.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, J.M.: 1987, ‘Lower esophageal contractility as an indicator of brain death,’ British Medical Journal, 295, 270.Google Scholar
  11. Grigg, M.M., et al.:1987, ‘Electroencephalographic activity after brain death,’ Archives of Neurology, 44, 948–54.Google Scholar
  12. Hassan, T. and Mumford, C.:1991, ‘Guillain-Barre syndrome mistaken for brainstem death,’ Postgraduate Medical Journal, 67, 280–281.Google Scholar
  13. Haun, S.E., Tobias, J.D., and Deshpande, J.K.: 1991, ‘Apnoea testing in the determination of brain death: Is it reliable?’ Clinical lntensive Care 2, 182–184.Google Scholar
  14. Heytens, I.et al.: 1989, ‘Lazarus sign and extensor posturing in abrain dead patient,’ Journal of Neurosurgery, 71, 449–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffenberg, R. et al.:1997, ‘Should organs from patients in PVS be used for transplantation?’ Lancet, 350, 1320–1321.Google Scholar
  16. Jastremski, M.S., et al.: 1991, ‘Spontaneous decerebrate movement after declaration of brain death,’ Neurosurgery, 29, 479–480.Google Scholar
  17. Klinck, J.R.and Lindop, M.J.:1998, Anesthesia & Intensive Care for OrganTransplantation, Chapman and Hall Medical, London.Google Scholar
  18. Lifton, R.J.: 1986, The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide, Macmillan Publishing Company, London.Google Scholar
  19. Lindop, M.J.:1991 ‘Basic principles of donor management for multiorgan removal,’ Transplantation Proceedings, 23, 2463–2464.Google Scholar
  20. Pallis, C.: 1985, ‘Defining death, ‘British Medical Journal, 291, 666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pallis, C.: 1987, ABC of Brain stem Death, 1st edition, British Medical Journal Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  22. Pallis, C. and Harley, D.H.: 1996, ABC of Brain stem Death, 2nd edition, BMJ Publishing Group, London.Google Scholar
  23. Peron-Autret: 1983, Buried Alive. Cox and Wyman, Reading, U.K.Google Scholar
  24. Ragosta, K.:1993 ‘Miller-Fisher syndrome, a brainstein encephalitis, mimics brain death,’ Clinical Pediatrics (Philadelphia), 32, 685–687.Google Scholar
  25. Reeve, C.: 1998, Still Me, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Skegg, P.D.G.: 1984, Law, Ethics and Medicine: Studies in Medical Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
  27. Wctzl, R.C. et al.:1985, ‘Hemodynamic responses in brain dead organ donor patients,’ Anesthesia and Analgesia, 64, 125–128.Google Scholar
  28. Zaloga, G.P.: 1990, ‘Endocrine function after brain death.’ Critical Care Medicine, 18, 785–786.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.The Old Post officeHuntindonUK

Personalised recommendations