Metaphysical Misgivings about “Brain Death”

  • David Albert Jones
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 66)


Brain Death Persistent Vegetative State Conscious Thought Brain Dead Patient Organ Retrieval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, A.: 1997, ‘German law could boost prospects for organ transplants,’ Nature 3 July, 388, 4.Google Scholar
  2. Agich, G.J. and Jones R. P.: 1986, ‘Personal identity and brain death: A critical response,’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 15, 267–274.Google Scholar
  3. Aquinas, St. T.: 1947, Summa Theologiae. Blackfriars, London.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, R.M. and Younger, S.J.: 1993, ‘The dead donor rule: Should we stretch it, bend it, or abandon it?’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 263–278.Google Scholar
  5. Beecher, H.K.: 1968, ‘A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the ad hoc committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death,’ JAMA 205, 337–340.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, L.:1975, ‘Human being: The boundaries of the concept’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, 334–359.Google Scholar
  7. Bernat, J.L.: 1992, ‘How much of the brain must die in brain death,’ Journal of Clinical Ethics 3, no. 1, 21–26.Google Scholar
  8. Black, D., et al.: 1995, ‘Criteria for the diagnosis of brain stem death,’ Journal of the Royal College of Physicians, London 29, 381–382.Google Scholar
  9. Braine, D.: 1992, The Human Person: Animal and Spirit, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, P.A., O’Reilly, S., and Quay, P.M.: 1979, ‘Brain death: An opposing viewpoint,’ JAMA 242, 1985–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne, P.A. et al.: 1982/83, ‘Brain Death: The patient, the physician, and society,’ Gonzaga Law Review 18, no. 3, 429–516.Google Scholar
  12. Byrne, P.A. and Nilges, R.G.: 1993, ‘The brain stem in brain death: A critical review,’ Issues in Law and Medicine 9, no. 1, 3–21.Google Scholar
  13. Capron, A. and Kass, L.:1972, ‘A statutory definition of the standards for determining human death: An appraisal and a proposal,’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121, no. 1, 87–88.Google Scholar
  14. Capron, A. M.: 1987, ‘Anencephalic donors: Separate the dead from the dying,’ Hastings Center Report 17, no. 1, 5–9Google Scholar
  15. Capron, A.M.: 1993, ‘The tell-tale heart: Public policy and the utilization of non-heart-beating donors,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 251–262.Google Scholar
  16. Catherwood, J.F.: 1992, ‘Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are “dead”?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 18, 34–39.Google Scholar
  17. Chagas, C.: 1986 (ed.), The Artificial Prolongation of Life and the Determination of the Exact Moment of Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City.Google Scholar
  18. Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom:1976, ‘Diagnosis of brain Death’ British Medical Journal 2, 1187–1188.Google Scholar
  19. Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom: 1979, ‘Diagnosis of death,’ British Medical Journal 1, 332.Google Scholar
  20. Danish Council of Ethics: 1989, Death Criteria—A Report, The Danish Council of Ethics, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, D.W. and Hill, D.J.: 1989, ‘The brain stems of organ donors are not dead,’ Catholic Medical Quarterly 40, no. 3, 113–120.Google Scholar
  22. Finnis, J.: 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Fisher, A.: 1993, ‘On not starving the unconscious,’ New Blackfriars, 130–145.Google Scholar
  24. Fox, R.C.: 1993, ‘“An ignoble form of cannibalism”: Reflections on the Pittsburgh Protocol for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadavers,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 231–239.Google Scholar
  25. Gallagher, J.A.: 1990, Time Past, Time Future: An Historical Study of Catholic Moral Theology Paulist Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  26. Gillet, G.R.: 1986, ‘Why let people die?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 12, 83–86.Google Scholar
  27. Gillet, G.R.: 1990, ‘Consciousness, the brain and what matters ‘Bioethics 4, 181–198.Google Scholar
  28. Gillon, R.: 1990, ‘Death’ (editiorial), Journal of Medical Ethics 16, 3–4.Google Scholar
  29. Gormally, L.: 1993, ‘Definitions of personhood,’ Catholic Medical Quarterly 44, no. 4, 7–12.Google Scholar
  30. Gormally, L.: 1994, ‘The BMA Report on Euthanasia and the case against legalization’ in L. Gormally, (ed.), Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law, The Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics, London.Google Scholar
  31. Green, M.B. and Wikler, D.: 1979, ‘Brain death and personal identity,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, 105–133.Google Scholar
  32. Grisez, G. and Boyle, J.M.: 1979. Life and Death with Liberty and Justice. A Contribution to the Euthanasia Debate, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame Indiana.Google Scholar
  33. Hardacre, H.: 1994, ‘Response of Buddhism and Shinto to the issue of brain death and organ transplantation,’ Cambridge Quarterly for Healthcare Ethics 3, 585–601.Google Scholar
  34. Hassaballah, A.M.: 1996, ‘Definition of death, organ donation and interruption of treatment in Islam,’ Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 11, 964–965.Google Scholar
  35. Hassler, R.: 1977, ‘Basal ganglia systems regulating mental activity,’ International Journal of Neurology 12, 53–72.Google Scholar
  36. Hoshino, K.: 1993, ‘Legal status of brain death in Japan: Why many Japanese do not accept “brain death” as a definition of death,’ Bioethics 7, 234–238.Google Scholar
  37. Iglesias, T.: 1991, ‘Death and the beginning of life,’ Ethics and Medicine 7, no. 2, 8–17.Google Scholar
  38. Jennett, B. and Plum, F.: 1972, ‘Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name,’ The Lancet 1, April 1, 734–737.Google Scholar
  39. John Paul II, Pope: 1995, EvangeliumVitae, Catholic Truth Society, London.Google Scholar
  40. Jonas, H.: 1974, ‘Against the stream.’ in H. Jonas, Philosophical essays: From Ancient Creed to Technological Man, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, D.A.: 1995, ‘Nagging doubts about brain death,’ Catholic Medical Quarterly 47, no 3, 263–273.Google Scholar
  42. Kaukinen, S., et al.: 1995, ‘Significance of electrical activity in brain-stem death,’ Intensive Care Medicine 21, 76–78.Google Scholar
  43. Kimura, R.: 1991, ‘Japan’s dilemma with the definition of death,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1, 123–131.Google Scholar
  44. Lamb, D.: 1991, ‘Death in Denmark,’ Journal of Medical Ethics 17, 100–101.Google Scholar
  45. Lamb, D.: 1994, ‘What is death?’ in R. Gillon (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 1027–1040.Google Scholar
  46. Lamb, D.:1996, Death, Brain Death, and Ethics, Averbury, Brookfield, Vermont.Google Scholar
  47. Lizza, J.P.: 1993, ‘Persons and death: What’s metaphysically wrong with our current statutory definition of death?’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18, 351–374.Google Scholar
  48. Lynn, J.: 1993, ‘Are the patients who become organ donors under the Pittsburgh Protocol for “non-heart-beating donors” really dead?’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 167–178.Google Scholar
  49. Matthews, G.B.: 1979, ‘Life and death as the arrival and departure of the Psyche,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 151–156.Google Scholar
  50. McCullagh, P.: 1993, Brain Dead,Brain Absent Brain Donors. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  51. McMahon, J.: 1995, ‘The metaphysics of brain death,’ Bioethics 9, 91–126.Google Scholar
  52. Olick, R.S.: 1991, ‘Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey’s landmark legislative initiative,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1, 275–292.Google Scholar
  53. Pallis, C.: 1990, ‘Return to Elisinore,’ Journal of Medical Ethics 16, 10–13. Parfit, D.: 1986, Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parisi, J.E. et al.: 1982, ‘Brain death with prolonged somatic survival,’ New England Journal of Medicine 306, 14–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pentz, R.D.: 1994, ‘Veatch and brain death: A plea for the soul,’ Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5, 132–135.Google Scholar
  56. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical problems in Medicine and Biomedicaland Behavioral Research: 1981. Defining Death: Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
  57. Puccetti, R.: 1988, ‘Does anyone survive neocortical death?’ in R. Zaner (ed.), Death: Beyond Whole Brain Criteria, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 75–79.Google Scholar
  58. Rix, B.A.: 1990a, ‘Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death,’ Journal of Medical Ethics 6, 5–7.Google Scholar
  59. Rix, B.A.: 1990b, ‘The importance of knowledge and trust in the definition of death,’ Bioethics 4, 232–236.Google Scholar
  60. Rothstein, J.: 1995, ‘Attending to transitions: A medical student’s encounter with transplantation,’ Making the Rounds in Health, Faith and Ethics 1, no 4, 1–5.Google Scholar
  61. Rutecki, G.W.: 1994, ‘Blurring distinctions between the dying and the dead: A call for discernment in organ donation,’ Ethics and Medicine 10, no 3, 60–67.Google Scholar
  62. Seifert, J.: 1992, ‘Is “brain death” actually death? A critique of redefining man’s death in terms of “brain death”,’ in R.J. White, H. Angstwurm, and I. Carrasco de Paula (eds.), Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City, pp. 95–143.Google Scholar
  63. Seifert, J.: 1993, ‘Is “brain death” actually death?’ The Monist 76, 173–202.Google Scholar
  64. Shewmon, D.A.: 1985, ‘The metaphysics of braindeath,persistentvegetativestate and dementia,’ The Thomist 49, no 1, 24–80.Google Scholar
  65. Shewmon, D.A.: 1989, ‘“Brain death”: a valid theme with invalid variation, blurred by semantic ambiguity,’ in R. White, H. Angstwurm, and I. Carrasco de Paula (eds.), Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City, pp. 23–51.Google Scholar
  66. Shewmon, D.A.: 1997, ‘Recovery from “brain death”: A neurologist’s apologia,’ Linacre Quarterly 64, 30–96.Google Scholar
  67. Shewmon, D.A., 1997. Cambridge Address.Google Scholar
  68. Singer, P.: 1995a, ‘Is the sanctity of life terminally ill?’ Bioethics 9, 327–343.Google Scholar
  69. Singer, P.: 1995b, Rethinking Life and Death, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  70. Steinberg, A.: 1996, ‘Definition of death,’ Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 11, 961–963.Google Scholar
  71. Submission to the Select Committee of the House of Lords on Medical Ethics by the Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics: 1994, in Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law, Linacre Centre, London.Google Scholar
  72. Swinbanks, D.: 1997, ‘Japan reaches a compromise on organ transplants,’ Nature 387, 835.Google Scholar
  73. Tomlinson T.: 1984, ‘The conservative use of the brain death criteriona—critique.’ Journal of Medicine and Phylosophy 9, 377–394.Google Scholar
  74. Tomlinson, T.: 1990, ‘Misunderstanding death on a respirator,’ Bioethics 4, 253–264.Google Scholar
  75. Tomlinson, T.: 1993, ‘The irreversibility of death: Reply to Cole,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 157–165.Google Scholar
  76. Tonti-Filippini, N.:1991, ‘Determining when death has occurred,’ Linacre Quarterly 58, no 1, 25–49.Google Scholar
  77. Troug, R.D.: 1997, ‘Is it time to abandon brain death?’ Hastings Center Report 27, no 1, 29–37.Google Scholar
  78. Veatch, R.M.: 1993. ‘The impending collapse of the whole-brain definition of death,’ Hastings Center Report 23, no 4, 18–24.Google Scholar
  79. Watanabe, Y.: 1994, ‘Why do I stand against the movement for cardiac transplantation in Japan?’ Japanese Heart Journal 35, 701–714.Google Scholar
  80. Weisbard, A.J.: 1993, ‘A polemic on principles: Reflections on the Pittsburgh Protocol,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 217–230.Google Scholar
  81. White, R.J., Angstwurm, H., and Carrasco de Paula, I. (eds.). Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City.Google Scholar
  82. Wikler, D.: 1993, ‘Brain death: A durable consensus?’ Bioethics 7, 239–246.Google Scholar
  83. Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, BasilBlackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  84. Williams, B.: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Fontana Press. London.Google Scholar
  85. Wittgenstein. L.: 1953, Philosophical lnvestigations, translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  86. Wreen, M.J.: 1987, ‘The definition of death,’ Public Affairs Quarterly 1, no 4, 87–99.Google Scholar
  87. Youngner, S.J. et al.: 1985, ‘Psychosocial and ethical implications of organ retrieval,’ New England Journal of Medicine 313, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Youngner, S.J. et al.: 1989, ‘”Brain death and organ retrieval: a cross-sectional survey of knowledge and concepts among health professionals,’ JAMA 261, 2205–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Youngner, S.J.: 1992, ‘Defining death: A superficial and fragile consensus,’ Archives of Neurology 49, 570–572.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Albert Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.BlackfriarsOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations