Mathematical Foundations of Scientific Visualization, Computer Graphics, and Massive Data Exploration pp 127-137 | Cite as
Local Geodesic Parametrization: an Ant’s Perspective
Summary
Two-dimensional parameterizations of meshes is a dynamic field of research. Most works focus on parameterizing complete surfaces, attempting to satisfy various con- straints on distances and angles and produce a 2D map with minimal errors. Except for devel- opable surfaces no single map can be devoid of errors, and a parametrization produced for one purpose usually doesn’t suit others. This work presents a different viewpoint. We try and acquire the perspective of an ant living on the surface. The point on which it stands is the center of its world, and importance diminishes from there onward. Distances and angles measured relative to its position have higher importance than those measured elsewhere. Hence, the local parametrization of the geo- desic neighborhood should convey this perspective by mostly preserving geodesic distances from the center. We present a method for producing such overlapping local-parametrization for each vertex on the mesh. Our method provides an accurate rendition of the local area of each vertex and can be used for several purposes, including clustering algorithms which focus on local areas of the surface within a certain window such as Mean Shift.
Keywords
Geodesic Distance Boundary Vertex Convex Boundary Center Vertex Original MeshPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.D. Comaniciu and P. Meer. Mean shift: A robust approach towards feature space analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24:603–619, May 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J. Erickson and S. Har-Peled. Optimally cutting a surface into a disk. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pages 244–253, 2002.Google Scholar
- 3.M. Floater. Parametrization and smooth approximation of surface triangulations. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 14:231–250, 1995.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.M. Floater. Mean value coordinates. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 20:19–27, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.M. Floater and K. Hormann. Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey. In N.A. Dodgson, M.S. Floater, and M.A. Sabin (eds.) Advances on Multiresolution in Geometric Modelling. Springer, Heidelberg, 2005, 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.R. Kimmel and J.A. Sethian. Computing geodesic paths on manifolds. volume 95, pages 8431–8435, July 1998.Google Scholar
- 7.Y. Lee, H.S. Kim, and S. Lee. Mesh parameterization with a virtual boundary. In Computers and Graphics (Special Issue of the 3rd Israel-Korea Binational Conf. on Geometric Modeling and Computer Graphics), volume 26, pages 677–686, 2002.Google Scholar
- 8.B. Levy and J.-L. Mallet. Non-distorted texture mapping for sheared triangulated meshes. In Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 343–352, 1998.Google Scholar
- 9.A. Shamir. Feature-space analysis of unstructured meshes. In Proceedings IEEE Visualization 2003, pages 185–192, Seattle, Washington, 2003.Google Scholar
- 10.A. Shamir, L. Shapira, and D. Cohen-Or. Mesh analysis using geodesic mean shift. The visual Computer, 22:1–10, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. Sheffer. Spanning tree seams for reducing parameterization distortion of triangulated surfaces. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2002 (SMI'02), pages 61–66, 2002.Google Scholar
- 12.A. Sheffer and E. de Sturler. Surface parameterization for meshing by triangulation flattening. In Proceedings of the 9th International Meshing Roundtable, pages 161–172, 2000.Google Scholar
- 13.E. W. Weisstein. Manifold. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Manifold.html, 2004.
- 14.G. Zigelman, R. Kimmel, and N. Kiryati. Texture mapping using surface flattening via multi-dimensional scaling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8(2):198–207, April 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar