Enzyme activity and cation exchange as tools for the study of the conformation of proteins adsorbed on mineral surfaces

  • H. Quiquampoix
  • P. Chassin
  • R. G. Ratcliffe
A. Colloids Of Biological Interest
Part of the Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science book series (PROGCOLLOID, volume 79)

Abstract

The modification of the conformation of proteins adsorbed on different mineral surfaces was followed indirectly using two methods. Firstly, the effect of the pH on enzyme activity of two β-D-glucosidases on different mineral surfaces was studied; a diminished activity would indicate a departure from the active conformation. The mineral surfaces were chosen for their electrical charge and hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity (montmorillonite, talc, goethite). Secondly, the exchange of paramagnetic charge compensating cations on adsorption of bovine serum albumin was studied by an NMR method and the specific interfacial area occupied by the protein on the clay surface was deduced.

The results with montmorillonite showed that below the i.e.p. the proteins were adsorbed up to the saturation level of the surface and adsorbed proteins unfolded; above the i.e.p. the surface coverage decreased and there was no major change in the conformation. In addition to these electrostatic interactions, the comparison between the results obtained with goethite and talc showed that hydrophobic interactions can also induce conformational changes.

Key words

Protein adsorption protein conformation electronegative surfaces hydrophobic surfaces nuclear magnetic resonance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McLaren AD, Peterson GH, Barshad I (1958) Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 22:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eirich FR (1977) J Colloid Interface Sci 58:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norde W, Lyklema J (1978) J Colloid Interface Sci 66:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norde W (1986) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 25:267–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quiquampoix H (1987) Biochimie 69:753–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quiquampoix H (1987) Biochimie 69:765–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwertmann U, Cambier P, Murad E (1985) Clays Clay Miner 33:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quiquampoix H, Ratcliffe RG, Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mc Cleary BV, Harrington J (1988) Methods Enzymol 160:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jdanov YuA, Kessler RM, Yakubova NR, Cherstnev KB (1977) Biokhimiya 42:26–33Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nanasi P, Kandra-Berti L, Vuong P (1976) Acta Biol Debrecina 13:11–15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norde W, Lyklema J (1978) J Colloid Interface Sci 66:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norde W, Lyklema J (1979) J Colloid Interface Sci 71:350–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chassin P, Jouany C, Quiquampoix H (1986) Clay Miner 21:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bowden JW, Nagarajah S, Barrow NJ, Posner AM, Quirk JP (1980) Aust J Soil Res 18:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Quiquampoix
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Chassin
    • 1
  • R. G. Ratcliffe
    • 2
  1. 1.Station de Science du Sol, I.N.R.A.Versailles CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations