Advertisement

Experiments of spatial impedance control

  • F. Caccavale
  • C. Natale
  • B. Siciliano
  • L. Villani
Chapter 2 Dynamics And Control
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 232)

Abstract

The goal of this work is to present the results of an experimental study of impedance control schemes for a robot manipulator in contact with the environment. Six-degree-of-freedom interaction tasks are considered which require the implementation of a spatial impedance described in terms of both its translational and its rotational part. Two representations of end-effector orientation are adopted; namely, Euler angles or quaternions, and the implications on the choice of different orientation displacements are discussed. The controllers are tested on an industrial robot with open control architecture in a number of case studies.

Keywords

Euler Angle Robot Manipulator Impedance Control Mechanical Impedance Rotational Part 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Hogan N 1985 Impedance control: An approach to manipulation, Parts I–III. ASME J Dyn Syst, Meas, Contr. 107:1–24zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Khatib O 1987 A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE J Robot Automat. 3:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Sciavicco L, Siciliano B 1996 Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Wen J T-Y, Kreutz-Delgado K 1991 The attitude control problem. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 36:1148–1162zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Egeland O, Godhavn J-M 1994 Passivity-based adaptive attitude control of a rigid spacecraft. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 39:842–846zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Yuan J S-C 1988 Closed-loop manipulator control using quaternion feedback. IEEE J Robot Automat. 4:434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Siciliano B, Villani L 1997 Six-degree-of-freedom impedance robot control. In: Proc 8th Int Conf Advanced Robot. Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fasse E D 1995 Simplification of compliance selection using spatial compliance control. In: Proc ASME Dyn Syst Contr Div. vol 57-1, pp 193–198Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bruni F, Caccavale F, Natale C, Villani L 1996 Experiments of impedance control on an industrial robot manipulator with friction. In: Proc 5th IEEE Int Conf Contr Appl. Dearborn, MI, pp 205–210Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Caccavale F, Chiacchio P 1994 Identification of dynamic parameters and feedforward control for a conventional industrial manipulator. Contr Engnr Pract. 2:1039–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Caccavale
    • 1
  • C. Natale
    • 1
  • B. Siciliano
    • 1
  • L. Villani
    • 1
  1. 1.PRISMA Lab Dipartimento di Informatica e SistemisticaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations