Formation and Dynamics of Self-Organized Structures in Surfactants and Polymer Solutions pp 167-171 | Cite as
Viscoelastic phase separation in complex fluids
Abstract
Phase separation in isotropic condensed matter has so far been believed to be classified into solid and fluid models. When there is a large difference in the characteristic rheological time between the components of a mixture, however, we need a model of phase separation, which we call “viscoelastic model”. This model is likely a general model that can describe all types of isotropic phase separation including solid and fluid model as special cases. We point out that this dynamic asymmetry between the components is quite common in complex fluids, one of whose components has large internal degrees of freedom. We also demonstrate that viscoelastic phase separation in such dynamically asymmetric mixtures can be characterized by the order-parameter switching phenomena. The primary order parameter switches from the composition to the deformation tensor, and back to the composition again, reflecting viscoelastic relaxation between a characteristic deformation time of phase separation and the slowest rheological time of the system. This unusual behavior can be explained as follows: the viscoelastic model contains various model of phase separation as special cases and the switching between them is induced by viscoelastic relaxational phenomena. Since the deformation tensor intrinsically has a geometrical nature, the pattern in the elastic regime is essentially different from that of usual phase separation in fluid mixtures; and, thus, there is no self-similarity in the pattern evolution.
Key words
Viscoelastic effects phase separation critical phenomena complex fluids dynamic asymmetryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Gunton JD, San Miguel, Sahni P (1983) In: Domb C, Lebowitz JH (eds) Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena, vol 8 Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Hohenberg PC, Halperin BI (1976) Rev Mod Phys 49:435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Tanaka H (1994) J Chem Phys 100:5253 and references therein; Tanaka H (1995) Int J Thermophys 16:371Google Scholar
- 4.Tanaka H (1996) Phys Rev Lett 76:787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brochard F, de Gennes PG (1977) Macromolecules 10:1157, Brochard F (1983) J Phys France 44:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.see e.g. Ver Strate Philippoff W (1974) Polym Lett 12:267 Rangel-Nafaile C, Metzner AB, Wissbrum KF (1984) Macromolecules17:1187; Wolf BA (1988) Makromol Chem 189:163. On the recent development, see references in refs. [7-11]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Tanaka T, Filmore DJ (1979) J Chem Phys 70:1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Helfand E, Fredrickson GH (1989) Phys Rev Lett 62:2648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Onuki A (1989) Phys Rev Lett 62:2427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Doi M In: Onuki A, Kawasaki K (ededs) Dynamics and Patterns in Complex Fluids. Springer, 1990 p 100Google Scholar
- 11.Milner ST (1993) Phys Rev E 48:3674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Doi M, Onuki A (1992) J Phys II France 2:1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.de Gennes PG (1979) Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of Polymer Dynamics (1986). Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 15.Tanaka H (1997) Prog Theor Phys Suppl 126:333; (1997) Phys Rev E 56:xxx; Tanaka H, Araki T (1997) Phys Rev Lett 78:4966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.see e.g. Onuki A Nishimori H (1991) Phys Rev B 43:13649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sekimoto K. Suematsu N, Kawasaki K (1989) Phys Rev A 39:4912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Onuki A (1993) In: Advances in Polymer Sciences, vol. 109, Springer, Berlin, p 63Google Scholar
- 19.Matsuo ES, Tanaka T (1988) J Chem Phys 89:1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Song SW, Torkelson M (1994) Macromolecules 27:6390Google Scholar
- 21.Widawski G, Rawiso M, Francois B (1994) Nature 369:387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Geller MJ, Huchra JP (1989) Science 246:897CrossRefGoogle Scholar