Robust control of a synchronous power generator

  • Matei Kelemen
  • Aimé Francis Okou
  • Ouassima Akhrif
  • Louis-A. Dessaint
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 258)

Abstract

In this article we apply simple robust linear control to a synchronous power generator driven by a hydraulic turbine and connected to an infinite bus. The goal is to obtain good performance simultaneously for the terminal voltage and the rotor speed for short circuits and also when abrupt, large and permanent variations occur in the parameters of the infinite bus and transmission line. To achieve the goal we increase considerably the crossover frequencies of the terminal voltage and rotor speed feedback loops by taking into account some physical limitations on the controls. The proposed control - of Quantitative Feedback Theory type - is compared in simulations with a classical linear control and a modern nonlinear one.

Keywords

Terminal Voltage Crossover Frequency Permanent Variation Hydraulic Turbine Quantitative Feedback Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akhrif O., Okou A. F., Dessaint L.-A., Champagne R. (1999) Application of a Multivariable Feedback Linearization Scheme for Rotor Angle Stability and Voltage Regulation of Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 14, 620–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson P. M., Fouad A. A. (1994) Power System Control and Stability. IEEE Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borghesani C., Chait Y., Yaniv Y. (1994) Quantitative Feedback Theory Toolbox. The Math Works Inc., Natick, Mass. 01760, USA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D'Azzo J. J., Houpis C. H. (1995) Linear Control System Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill, New-York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horowitz I. (1993) Quantitative Feedback Design Theory (QFT), 1. QFT Publications, Superior, Colorado 80027, USA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelemen M. (1986) A Stability Property. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., 31 766–768.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kundur P. (1994) Power System Stability and Control. McGraw Hill, Montreal.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanković A. M., Tadmor G., Sakharuk T. A. (1998) On Robust Control Analysis and Design for Load Frequency Regulation. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 13, 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IEEE Committee Report (1992) Hydraulic Turbine and Turbine Control Models for System Dynamic Studies. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 7, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu G., Dessaint L.-A., Akhrif O. (1999) On the Damping of Local Mode Oscillations by Time-Scale Decomposition. Can. J. Elect. & Comp. Eng., 24, 175–180.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matei Kelemen
    • 1
  • Aimé Francis Okou
    • 1
  • Ouassima Akhrif
    • 1
  • Louis-A. Dessaint
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentÉcole de Technologie Supérieure GRÉPCIMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations