Modern theories of chemical bonding in crystals

  • J. C. Phillips
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Advances in Solid State Physics book series (ASSP, volume 17)

Abstract

Traditional methods for treating chemical bonding in crystals, including classical size and electronegativity parameters and Huckel atomic orbital methods, are compared with several modern approaches. Local pseudopotential theories, dielectric theory and ℓ (nonlocal) atomic radii have given results that are more accurate than the classical methods, yet still are quantum-mechanical in character. A distinction is made between pedagogical models and more realistic and more accurate models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    W. B. Pearson, Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals, Vol. 2 (Pergamon Press, New York, 1967); The Crystal Chemistry and Physics of Metals and Alloys (Wiley, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Hansen, Constitution of Binary Alloys (McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1958); R. P. Elliott Constitution of Binary Alloys, First Supplement (McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1965); F. A. Shunk Constitution of Binary Alloys, Second Supplement (McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1969).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Parthe, Crystal Chemistry of Tetrahedral Structures (Gordon and Breach, N.Y., 1970).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. B. Hannay (Editor), Treatise on Solid State Chemistry (Seven Volumes) (Plenum Press, New York, 1973–77).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. C. Phillips, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 317 (1970); also Chap. 1, Vol. I of ref. [4].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. E. Aspnes, C. G. Olson and D. W. Lynch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 766 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1960).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. S. Darken and R. W. Gurry, Physical Chemistry of Metals (McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1953); J. T. Waber et al., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 227, 717 (1963).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. C. Pandey and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 13B, 750 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. L. Cohen, V. Heine and D. Weaire, in Solid State Physics 24 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    N. D. Lang and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B1, 4555 (1970); B3, 1215 (1971).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    O. Gunnarson, H. Hjelmberg and B. I. Lundquist Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 292 (1976); J. P. Perdew and R. Monnier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1286 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. A. Appelbaum and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 225 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. A. Appelbaum and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 806 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. G. Louie and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 866 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Schluter, to be published.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    K. C. Pandey, T. Sakurai and H. D. Hagstrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1728 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    K. C. Pandey, Phys. Rev., 14B, 1557 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Kleinman and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 125, 819 (1962).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 166, 832 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Morita, T. Soma and T. Takeda, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 32, 29 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    W. Weber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 371 (1974); K. C. Rustagi and W. Weber, Sol. State Comm. 18, 673 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. C. Phillips, Solid State Physics 18, 56 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. L. Cohen and T. K. Bergstresser, Phys. Rev. 141, 789 (1966).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 550 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. C. Phillips, Bonds and Bands in Semiconductors (Academic Press, N.Y., 1973).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    J. A. Van Vechten, Phys. Rev. 182, 891 (1969); 187, 1007 (1969); B7, 1479 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    A. Navrotsky and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 11B, 1583 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. L. Cohen, Science 179, 1189 (1973); J. P. Walter and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 17 (1971).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    J. A. Van Vechten, Phys. Rev. B10, 4222 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    W. A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. B8, 4487 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1196 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    W. A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. 14B, 702 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    W. A. Harrison and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 410 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    G. Simons, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 756 (1971); G. Simons and A. N. Bloch, Phys. Rev. 7B, 2754 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    E. Fues, Ann. Physik 80, 367 (1926).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    T. Regge, Nuovo Cimento 14, 951 (1959). Titles of many papers in the literature now contain phrases such as “Reggeizing” and “Reggeons”.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. N. Bloch and G. Simons, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 8611 (1972); E. S. Machlin, Acta Metall. (to be published).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    J. St. John and A. N. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1095 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    J. C. Phillips, Sol. State Comm. (to be published).Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    E. S. Machlin, T. P. Chow and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press).Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    J. R. Chelikowsky and J. C. Phillips (to be published).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA

Personalised recommendations