Stochastic Dynamics pp 15-22 | Cite as
Generalized langevin equations: A useful tool for the perplexed modeller of nonequilibrium fluctuations?
Concepts Of Stochastics And Kinetics
First Online:
Abstract
The author identifies some subtle difficulties that one encounters within the framework of nonlinear generalized Langevin equations. These difficulties become even more pronounced when describing an open system that is in contact with more than one heat bath.
Keywords
Langevin Equation Heat Bath Relaxation Dynamic Stochastic Force Longtime Limit
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Adelman S. A., J. Chem. Phys. 64: 124 (1976).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Bez W., Z. Phys. B 39: 319 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Canizares J. S. and Sols F., Physica A 212: 181 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Cortes E., West B. J., and Lindenberg K., J. Chem. Phys. 82: 2708 (1985).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Ford G. W. and Kac M., J. Stat. Phys. 46: 803 (1987); note also the survey of models presented in: Ford G. W., Lewis J. T., and O'Connel R. F., Phys. Rev. A 37: 4419 (1988).CrossRefMathSciNetMATHADSGoogle Scholar
- Grabert H., Hänggi P., and Talkner P., J. Stat. Phys. 22: 537 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Grabert H., Springer Tracts in Mod. Phys. 95: 1–162 (1982).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hänggi P., Z. Phys. B 31: 407 (1978); Hänggi P., Noise in nonlinear dynamical systems, Vol. 1, Moss F. and McClintock P. V. E., eds., (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989); pp: 307–328.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- Hänggi P. and Bartussek R., Brownian Rectifiers: How to Convert Brownian Motion into Directed Transport, in: Nonlinear Physics of Complex Systems-Current Status and Future Trends, J. Parisi, S. C., Müller and W. Zimmermann, eds., Springer Series’ Lecture Notes in Physics’ (Springer, Berlin, 1996).Google Scholar
- Hänggi P. and F. Mojtabai, Phys. Rev. A 26: 1168 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Hänggi P. and Thomas H., Phys. Rep. C 88: 207 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Kawasaki K., J. Phys. A 6: 1289 (1973).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Klein O., Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 16, No. 5: 1 (1922).Google Scholar
- Kramers H. A., Physica (Utrecht) 7: 284 (1940).MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Magalinskij V. B., Sov. Phys. JETP 9: 1381 (1959) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 36: 1942 (1959)].MATHGoogle Scholar
- Millonas M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74: 10 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Mori H., Progr. Theor. Phys. 33: 423 (1965).MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Nordholm K. S. J. and Zwanzig R., J. Stat. Phys. 13: 347 (1975).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- Pollak E., Phys. Rev. A 33: 4244 (1986).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Rieder Z., Lebowitz J. L., and Lieb E., J. Math. Phys. 8: 1073 (1967).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- Zürcher U. and Talkner P., Phys. Rev. A 42; 3267 (1990); ibid 42: 3278 (1990).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Zwanzig R., J. Stat. Phys. 9: 215 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 1997