Pincer-search: A new algorithm for discovering the maximum frequent set

  • Dao-I Lin
  • Zvi M. Kedem
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1377)


Discovering frequent itemsets is a key problem in important data mining applications, such as the discovery of association rules, strong rules, episodes, and minimal keys. Typical algorithms for solving this problem operate in a bottom-up breadth-first search direction. The computation starts from frequent 1-itemsets (minimal length frequent itemsets) and continues until all maximal (length) frequent item-sets are found. During the execution, every frequent itemset is explicitly considered. Such algorithms perform reasonably well when all maximal frequent itemsets are short. However, performance drastically decreases when some of the maximal frequent itemsets are relatively long. We present a new algorithm which combines both the bottom-up and top-down searches. The primary search direction is still bottom-up, but a restricted search is also conducted in the top-down direction. This search is used only for maintaining and updating a new data structure we designed, the maximum frequent candidate set. It is used to prune candidates in the bottom-up search. A very important characteristic of the algorithm is that it does not require explicite examination of every frequent itemset. Therefore the algorithm performs well even when some maximal frequent itemsets are long. As its output, the algorithm produces the maximum frequent set, i.e., the set containing all maximal frequent itemsets, which therefore specifies immediately all frequent itemsets. We evaluate the performance of the algorithm using a well-known benchmark database. The improvements can be up to several orders of magnitude, compared to the best current algorithms.


Association Rule Minimum Support Frequent Itemsets Mining Association Rule Apriori Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proc. SIGMOD, May 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In Proc. 20th VLDB, Sept. 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Agrawal and J. Shafer. Parallel mining of association rules. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Jan. 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Brin, R. Motwani, J. Ullman, and S. Tsur. Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In Proc. SIGMOD, May 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, and R. Uthrusamy (Eds.). Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Gunopulos, H. Mannila, and S. Saluja. Discovering all most specific sentences by randomized algorithm. In Proc. Intl. Conf. of Database Theory, Jan. 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Han and Y. Fu. Discovery of multiple-level association rules from large databases. In Proc. 21st VLDB, Sept. 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Lin and Z. Kedem. Pincer-Search: A new algorithm for discovering the maximum frequent set. Technical Report TR1997-742, Dept. of Computer Science, New York University, Sept. 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Mannila and H. Toivonen. Discovering frequent episodes in sequences. In Proc. KDD'95, Aug. 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Mannila and H. Toivonen. Levelwise search and borders of theories in knowledge discovery. Technical Report TR C-1997-8, Dept. of Computer Science, U. of Helsinki, Jan. 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Mannila, H. Toivonen, and A. Verkamo. Improved methods for finding association rules. In Proc. AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, July 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 18, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. özden, S. Ramaswamy. and A. Silberschatz. Cyclic Association Rules. In Proc. 14th Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, 1998, to appear.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Park, M. Chen, and P. Yu. An effective hash-based algorithm for mining association rules. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD, May 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Piatetsky-Shapiro. Discovery, analysis, and presentation of strong rules. Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AAAI Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Sarasere, E. Omiecinsky, and S. Navathe. An efficient algorithm for mining association rules in large databases. In Proc. 21st VLDB, Sept. 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining generalized association rules. IBM Research Report RJ 9963, June 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Toivonen. Sampling large databases for association rules. In Proc. 22nd VLDB, Sept. 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. J. Zaki, S. Parthasarathy, M. Ogihara, and W. Li. New algorithms for fast discovery of association rules. In Proc. KDD'97, Aug. 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dao-I Lin
    • 1
  • Zvi M. Kedem
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science Courant Institute of Mathematical SciencesNew York UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations