Advertisement

Structural biology metaphors applied to the design of a distributed object system

  • Ladislau Bölöni
  • Ruibing Hao
  • Kyungkoo Jun
  • Dan C. Marinescu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1586)

Abstract

In this paper we present the basic ideas of a distributed object middleware for network computing. We argue that when building complex systems out of components one can emulate the lock and key mechanisms used by proteins to recognize each other.

Keywords

Finite State Machine Message Passing Network Computing Network Object Completion Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Branden and J. Toose. “Introduction to Protein Structure” Garland Publishing 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: A perceiving and recognizing automaton”, 85-460-1, Project PARA Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Ithaca, NY, 1957.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Hopfield Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent “Collective Computational Abilities” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1982 vol. 79, pp. 2554.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, “Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models”, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1986Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. R. Koza, “Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection”, MIT Press 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Bölöni. “Bond Objects—A White Paper.” Department of Computer Sciences, Purdue University CSD-TR #98-002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Bölöni, Ruibing Hao, K. K. Jun, and D. C. Marinescu. “Subprotocols: an object-oriented solution for semantic understanding of messages in a distributed object system”, September 1998, (submitted).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Mani Chandy. “Caltech Inforspheres Project Overview: Information Infrastructures for Task Forces.”Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.C. Cornea Hasegan, Z. Zhang, R.E. Lynch, D. C. Marinescu, A. Hadfield, J.K. Muckelbauer, S. Munshi, L. Tong and M.G. Rossmann. “Phase Refinement and Extension by Means of Non-crystallographic Symmetry Averaging using Parallel Computers.” Acta Cryst D51, pp 749–759, 1995Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.C. Fabre and T. Perennou. “A Metaobject Architecture for Fault Tolerant Distributed Systems: The FRIENDS Approach” IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol 47, No 1, pp 78–95, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Finin, et al. “Specification of the KQML Agent-Communication Language” DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative draft, June 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. E. Lynch, D. C. Marinescu, H. Lin, and T. S. Baker. “Parallel Algorithms for 3D Reconstruction of Asymmetric Objects from Electron Micrographs” September 1998, (submitted).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. Martin, D.C. Marinescu, R. E. Lynch, and T. S. Baker. “Identification of Spherical Virus Particles in Digitized Images of Entire Micrographs” Journal of Structural Biology, 120, pp 146–157, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Martin and D.C. Marinescu “Concurrent Computations and Data Visualization for Structure Determination of Spherical Viruses” IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 1998 (in press).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. J. Stroud. “Transparency and Reflection in Distributed Systems” ACM Operating Systems vol. 22, no. 2 pp. 99–103, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ladislau Bölöni
    • 1
  • Ruibing Hao
    • 1
  • Kyungkoo Jun
    • 1
  • Dan C. Marinescu
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Sciences DepartmentPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations