Support for software federations: The PIE1 platform

  • G. Cugola
  • P. Y. Cunin
  • S. Dami
  • J. Estublier
  • A. Fuggetta
  • F. Pacull
  • M. Rivière
  • H. Verjus
Session 0: PIE Workshop
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1780)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Estublier and N.S. Barghouti. Interoperability and Distribution of Process-Sensitive Systems. Software Engineering for Parallel and Distributed Systems (PDSE'98). Kyoto April 19–25, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Heiler. Semantic Interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys, 27(2):271–273, June, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Heimbigner. “The ProcessWall: a Process State Server Approach to Process Programming”. ACM-SDE, December 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Object Management Group, “CORBA services: Common Object Services Specification”, July 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Object Management Group, “The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specifications (revision 2.0)”. OMG, Framinghm, MA, July 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Sun Microsystems, “Java Remote Method Invocation Specification”, February 10, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sun Microsystems, “Java Message Service”, Version 1.0.5, October 5, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sun Microsystems, “Java Naming and Directory Interface”, Version 1.2, July 14, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Garlan, “Low-cost adaptable tool integration policies for integrated environments”, in Proceedings of SDE90.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Cugola, E. Di Nitto, A. Fuggetta, “Exploiting an event-based infrastructure to develop complex distributed systems”, in Proceedings of ICSE'20, April 1998Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    OVUM, “OVUM Evaluates: Middleware”, OVUM Ltd, 1996Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.M. Andreoli, D. Arregui, F. Pacull, M. Riviere, J.Y. Vion-Dury, J. Willamowski, “CLF/Mekano: A Framework for Building Virtual-Enterprise Applications”, in Proceedings of International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, 1999, (to appear)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Estublier, H. Verjus, “Definition of the Behaviour Paradigms of a Heterogeneous Federation of Evolving Process Components”, PIE2 Deliverable D2.01, 1999Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    I. Alloui, S. Beydeda, S. Cîmpan, V. Gruhn, F. Oquendo and C. Schneider “Advanced Services for process Evolution: Monitoring and Decision Support”, EWSPT7, Salzburg, Austria, February 2000Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Greenwood, I. Robertson and B. Warboys, “A Support Framework for Dynamic Organizations”, EWSPT7, Salzburg, Austria, February 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Cugola
    • 1
  • P. Y. Cunin
    • 2
  • S. Dami
    • 2
  • J. Estublier
    • 2
  • A. Fuggetta
    • 1
  • F. Pacull
    • 3
  • M. Rivière
    • 3
  • H. Verjus
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoItaly
  2. 2.LSR laboratoryGrenoble UniversityFrance
  3. 3.Xerox Research Centre EuropeGrenobleFrance
  4. 4.LLP/CESALP laboratorySavoie UniversityAnnecyFrance

Personalised recommendations