On the Gabriel dimension and subidealizer rings

E. P. Armendariz and J. W. Fisher, Idealizers in rings, J. Algebra 39(1976), 551–562.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

S. U. Chase, A generalization of the ring of triangular matrices, Nagoya Math. J. 18(1961), 13–25.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

K. R. Goodearl, Idealizers and nonsingular rings, Pacific J. Math. 48(1973), 395–402.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

_____, Localization and splitting in hereditary noetherian prime rings, Pacific J. Math. 53(1974), 137–151.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

_____, Subrings of idealizer rings, J. Algebra 33(1975), 405–429.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

R. Gordon and J. C. Robson, Krull dimension, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 133(1973).Google Scholar

__________, The Gabriel dimension of a module, J. Algebra 29 (1974), 459–473.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

F. Hansen, Schranken für die Gabriel-und Krull-dimension Idealisator-ähnlicher Ringerweiterungen, Arch. Math. 28(1977), 584–593.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

G. Krause, Krull dimension and Gabriel dimension of idealizers of semimaximal left ideals, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 12(1976), 137–140.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

G. Krause and M. L. Teply, The transfer of the Krull dimension and the Gabriel dimension to subidealizers, Canad. J. Math. 29(1977), 874–888.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

J. C. Robson, Idealizers and hereditary noetherian prime rings, J. Algebra 22(1972), 45–81.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

_____, Simple noetherian rings need not have unity elements, Bull. London Math. Soc. 7(1975), 269–270.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

B. Stenström, Rings and modules of quotients, Lecture Notes in Math 237, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1971.MATHGoogle Scholar

M. L. Teply, Prime singular-splitting rings with finiteness conditions, Noncommutative ring theory — Kent State 1975, Lecture Notes in Math. 545, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976, 173–194.Google Scholar

_____, On the transfer of properties to subidealizer rings, Communications in Algebra 5(1977), 743–758.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar