Advertisement

Spatial dependence in the observation of visual contours

  • John MacCormick
  • Andrew Blake
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1407)

Abstract

Two challenging problems in object recognition are: to output structures that can be interpreted statistically; and to degrade gracefully under occlusion. This paper proposes a new method for addressing both problems simultaneously. Specifically, a likelihood ratio termed the Markov discriminant is used to make statistical inferences about partially occluded objects. The Markov discriminant is based on a probabilistic model of occlusion which introduces spatial dependence between observations on the object boundary. This model is a Markov random field, which acts as the prior for Bayesian estimation of the posterior using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. The method takes as its starting point a “contour discriminant” designed to differentiate between a target and random background clutter.

Keywords

Posterior Distribution Markov Chain Monte Carlo Importance Sampling Markov Random Field Measurement Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Amir and M. Lindenbaum. Grouping based non-additive verification. Technical Report 9518, Center for Intelligent Systems, Technion, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Chandler. Introduction to Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Gidas. A renormalisation group approach to image processing problems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(2):164–180, 1989.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Grenander. Lectures in Pattern Theory I, II and III. Springer, 1976–1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.E.L. Grimson, D.P. Huttenlocher, and D.W. Jacobs. A study of affine matching with bounded sensor error. In Proc. 2nd European Conf. Computer Vision, pages 291–306, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.T. Kent, K.V. Mardia, and A.N. Walder. Conditional cyclic Markov random fields. Adv. Appl. Prob., 28:1–12, 1996.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.K. Leung, M.C. Burl, and P. Perona. Finding faces in cluttered scenes using random graph matching. In Proc. IEEE PAMI Conf., pages 637–644, Cambridge, June 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.G. Lowe. Robust model-based motion tracking through the integration of search and estimation. Int. J. Computer Vision, 8(2):113–122, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.P. MacCormick and A. Blake. A probabilistic contour discriminant for object localisation. In Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Computer Vision, Jan 1998.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Perez and F Heitz. Restriction of a Markov random field on a graph and multiresolution statistical image modelling. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 42(1):180–190, 1996.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.D. Ripley. Stochastic simulation. New York: Wiley, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Rothwell. Reasoning about occlusions during hypothesis verification. In Proc. 4th European Conf. Computer Vision, pages 599–609, April 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. Shimshoni and J. Ponce. Probabilistic 3D object recognition. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Computer Vision, pages 488–493, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Winkler. Image analysis, random fields and dynamic Monte Carlo methods. Springer, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • John MacCormick
    • 1
  • Andrew Blake
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations