HPCN-Europe 1995: High-Performance Computing and Networking pp 904-909 | Cite as
A review of the PEPSE (Parallel Electromagnetic Problem Solving Environment) project
Abstract
This paper describes a project — PEPSE — which is currently under way, under the auspices of the ESPRIT initiative sponsored by the European Commission, to adapt a suite of world class electromagnetics problem solving software, to enable it to run on the industry's leading parallel high performance computers, and thus solve problems which are currently beyond industry's capabilities. The paper will proceed to briefly review the code capabilities and the techniques used. A discussion of the main issues which govern the design and construction of the parallel codes, together with an indication of the implications on prospective performance of the PEPSE system, will also be included in the paper. This will cover such areas as domain decomposition, processor mapping, load balancing and data structure. Due to restriction on space only the EMA3D parallel design strategy will be alluded to. The last section of the paper discusses benchmark tests and contains initial scaleability results.
Keywords
Domain Decomposition Parallel Code Frequency Selective Surface Carbon Fibre Composite Prospective PerformancePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Yee KS, “Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problem Involving Maxwell's Equations in Isotropic Media”. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. AP-14, pp. 302–307, May 1966.Google Scholar
- [2]McKenna PM. Rudolph TH. Perala RA. “A Time Domain Representation of Surface and Transfer Impedances Useful for Analysis of Advanced Composite Aircraft”. Int. Aerosp. and Ground Conf. on Lightning and Static Electricity pp37–1 to 37–6 June 1984Google Scholar
- [3]Rudolph T. “Transfer and Surface Impedance of Multilayer Anisotropic Composites (Fortran code MLAYER)”. EMA-92-R-002 Oct 1991.Google Scholar
- [4]McKenna P. “Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Fully Anisotropic Slabs” EMA-92-R-035 July 1992.Google Scholar
- [5]Mur G. “Absorbing Boundary Conditions for Finite Difference Approximations of the Time Domain Electromagnetic Field Equations”. IEEE Trans. EMC Vol, EMC-23, pp 377–382, Nov 1981.Google Scholar
- [6]Fang J. “Time Domain Finite Difference Computation for Maxwell's Equations” PhD Thesis, Dept. of Elec. Eng. and Comp. Sci., Univ. Ca. Berkeley 1989.Google Scholar
- [7]Merewether DE, Fisher R, Smith FW, “On Implementing a Numeric Huygens' Source Scheme in a Finite Difference Program to Illuminate Scattering Bodies” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., Vol. NS-27, pp 1819–1833, Dec 1980.Google Scholar
- [8]McKenna PM. Dalke RA. Perala RA. Steffen DA. “Evaluation of the Observability/Detectability of Electrostatically Charged Rotorcraft, Phase 1” EMA-89-R-36, March 1989.Google Scholar
- [9]Hoare, C.A.R., “Communicating Sequential Processes”, Prentice-Hall International, London, 1985.Google Scholar
- [10]Chandy, K.M., and Misra, J., “Parallel Program Design: A Foundation”, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
- [11]Innes, J., and Gorton, I., “Software Engineering for Parallel Systems”, Information and Software Technology”, Vol. 36, No. 7, 1994, pp. 381–396.Google Scholar