Advertisement

Estimating throughput for a flexible part feeder

  • Ken Goldberg
  • John Craig
  • Brian Carlisle
  • Rob Zanutta
Chapter 11 Fine-Motion Planning and Control
Part of the Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences book series (LNCIS, volume 223)

Abstract

To rapidly feed industrial parts on an assembly line, Carlisle et. al. [4] proposed a flexible part feeding system that drops parts on a flat conveyor belt, determines their pose (position and orientation) with a vision system and uses a high-speed scara robot to move them to a pallet in a desired pose. Such a feeder can be rapidly configured and reconfigured to handle a variety of parts. To facilitate rapid set-up of assembly lines, a simulator can provide visualization and realistic timing estimates. This paper focuses on estimating feeder throughput, which determines the “heartbeat” of an assembly line.

Keywords

Assembly Line Conveyor Belt Robot Motion Industrial Part Part Feeder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    David Baraff. Issues in computing contact forces for non-penetrating rigid bodies. Algorithmica, 10:292–352, August 1993. Special Issue on Computational Robotics.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. Boothroyd, A. H. Redford, C. Poli, and L. E. Murch. Statistical distributions of natural resting aspects of parts for automatic handling. SME Manufacturing Engineering Transactions, 1:72, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Geoffrey Boothroyd, Corrado Poli, and Laurence E. Murch. Automatic Assembly. Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Brian Carlisle, Ken Goldberg, Anil Rao, and Jeff Wiegley. A pivoting gripper for feeding industrial parts. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, May 1994. Also available as USC Techreport IRIS-93-316.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    John J. Craig. Issues in the design of an off-line programming system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium of Robotics Research, August 1987.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Peter Dewhurst. Design for robotic assembly. Manufacturing Engineering, June 1991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gregory T. Farnum and Bill Davis. Delivering the part. Manufacturing Engineering, March 1986.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Hoang and R.G. Fenton. Determination of robot's location in manufacturing cell. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Robots, October 1992.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gerald Kim, George Bekey, and Ken Goldberg. A shape metric for design-for-assembly. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, May 1992.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Matthew T. Mason, Ken Goldberg, and Yu Wang. Progress in robotic manipulation. In 15th Grantees Conference on Production Research and Technology. National Science Foundation, January 1989.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. Mirtich, Y. Zhuang, K. Goldberg, J. Craig, R. Zanutta, B. Carlisle, and J. Canny. Estimating pose statistics for robotic part feeders. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996 (submitted).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Brian Mirtich and John Canny. Impulse-based dynamic simulation. In The First Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics. A. K. Peters, Boston, MA, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    James L. Nevins and Daniel E. Whitney. Computer-controlled assembly. Scientific American, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    B. K. A. Ngoi, L. E. N. Lim, and S. S. G. Lee. Analyzing the probabilities of natural resting for a component with a virtual resting face. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, (to appear), 1995.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos. Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Rao, D. Kriegman, and K. Goldberg. Complete algorithms for reorienting polyhedral parts using a pivoting gripper. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, May 1995.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Berhard J. Schroer. Electronic parts presentation using vibratory bowl feeders. Robotics, 3, 1987.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Neil C. Singer. Utilizing dynamic and static stability to orient parts. Master's thesis, MIT, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Jeff Wiegley, Anil Rao, and Ken Goldberg. Computing a statistical distribution of stable poses for a polyhedron. In The 30th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, October 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Goldberg
    • 1
  • John Craig
    • 2
  • Brian Carlisle
    • 3
  • Rob Zanutta
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Silma, Inc.CupertinoUSA
  3. 3.Adept Technology, Inc.San JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations