Advertisement

Dictionary methods for cross-lingual information retrieval

  • Lisa Ballesteros
  • Bruce Croft
Information Retrieval 1
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1134)

Abstract

Multi-lingual information retrieval (IR) has largely been limited to the development of systems for use with a specific foreign language. The explosion in the availability of electronic media in languages other than English makes the development of IR systems that can cross language boundaries increasingly important. In this paper, we present experiments that analyze the factors that affect dictionary based methods for cross-lingual retrieval and present methods that dramatically reduce the errors such an approach usually makes.

Keywords

Information Retrieval Average Precision Relevance Feedback Query Term Relevance Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Attar and A. S. Fraenkel. Local feedback in full-text retrieval systems. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 24:397–417, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Broglio, J. Callan, and W.B. Croft. Inquery system overview. In Proceedings of the TIPSTER Text Program (Phase I), pages 47–67, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mark Davis and Ted Dunning. Query translation using evolutionary programming for multi-lingual information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mark Davis and Ted Dunning. A tree evaluation of query translation methods for multi-lingual text retrieval. In In Proceedings of the Fourth Retrieval Conference (TREC-4) Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 500-215, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ted Dunning and Mark Davis. Multi-lingual information retrieval. Technical report MCCS-93-252, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.W. Furnas, S. Deerwester, S.T. Dumais, T.K. Landauer anmd R.A. Harshman, L.A. Streeter, and K.E. Lochbaum. Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 465–480, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donna Harman, editor. Proceedings of the 4th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Jing and W.B. Croft. An association thesaurus for information retrieval. In RIAO 94 Conference Proceedings, pages 146–160, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas K. Landauer and Michael L. Littman. Fully automatic cross-language document retrieval. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Electronic Text Research, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerard Salton and Chris Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41:288–297, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howard R. Turtle and W. Bruce Croft. Efficient probabilistic inference for text retrieval. In RIAO 3 Conference Proceedings, pages 664–661, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Howard R. Turtle and W. Bruce Croft. Inference networks for document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1–24, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Ballesteros
    • 1
  • Bruce Croft
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations