CVRMed 1997, MRCAS 1997: CVRMed-MRCAS'97 pp 531-540 | Cite as

Effects of tracking adjacent vertebral bodies during image guided pedicle screw surgery

  • Neil Glossop
  • Richard Hu
Basic Tools and Applications in Spine Surgery
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1205)

Abstract

An optical position sensor was used to measure the motion of L3–L5 in a pig spine under ventilation, transverse loading, and during use of the pedicle awl. The spine of an intact, ventilated pig was first exposed to reveal the lumbar vertebrae and schantz pins with optical trackers were attached to the spinous processes. The motion of the three vertebrae was monitored during ventilation and then while loading was applied. Transverse loads of 10 N were applied to each vertebra in turn, and the corresponding motion observed. Flexion-distraction followed by three column injuries were simulated between L4 and L5 and the measurements repeated. While motion due to breathing was similar for all vertebra the segments moved by differing amounts once loading was applied. Once loading was released, the segments appeared to return to the pre-loaded positions. Destabilization of the spine, by simulating ligamentous injury, caused an increase in the amount of motion, but the inter-segmental position returned to preloaded positions.

Keywords

Vertebral Body Pedicle Screw Spinous Process Vertebral Segment Adjacent Vertebral Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Glossop, N., Hu, R, and Randle, J., Assessment of vertebral body motion during spine surgery. Accepted for publication, Spine 1997Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glossop, N., Hu, R, and Randle, J., Computer aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis. Spine 1996;21:2026–2034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferguson, R.L. and Allen, B.L., A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res. 1984;189:77–88Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denis, F., Spinal instability as defined by the three column spine concept in acute spinal trauma., Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res. 1984; 189:65–76Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    White III, A., and Punjabi M., Clinical Biomechanics of the spine, 2nd edition, J.P. Lippencot, Philadelphia (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Glossop
    • 1
  • Richard Hu
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Orthopaedic SurgerySunnybrook Health Science CentreTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations