Advertisement

Shuffle of ω-words: Algebraic aspects

(Extended Abstract)
  • Alexandru Mateescu
Automata and Formal Languages I
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1373)

Abstract

We introduce and investigate some sets of ω-trajectories that have the following properties: each of them defines an associative and commutative operation of shuffle of ω-words and, moreover, each of them satisfies a certain condition of fairness. The interrelations between these sets are studied as well as with other well-known classes of ω-words, like infinite Sturmian words, periodic and ultimately periodic ω-words.

Keywords

Parallel Composition Atomic Action Fairness Condition Bounded Increase Associative Closure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Berstel, Recent Results on Sturmian Words, in Developments in Language Theory, eds. J. Dassow, G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, World Scientific, 1996, 13–24.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    O. Carton, Mots Infinis, ω-Semigroupes et Topologie, Universite Paris 7, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Choffrout and J. Karhumäki, Combinatorics of Words in Handbook of Formal Languages, eds. G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, Springer, 1997, 329–438.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. S. Golan, The Theory of Semirings with Applications in Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex, 1992.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Lothaire, Combinatorics on Words, Addison Wesley, vol. 17 Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Mateescu and G.D. Mateescu, “Associative shuffle of infinite words”, TUGS Technical Report, 104, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Mateescu, G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, “Shuffle on Trajectories: Syntactic Constraints”, Technical Report 96-18, University of Leiden, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Park, “Concurrency and automata on infinite sequences”, in Theoretical Computer Science, ed. P. Deussen, LNCS 104, Springer-Verlag, 1981, 167–183.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Perrin and J. E. Pin, Mots Infinis, Report LITP 93.40, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. Staiger, “ω-Languages”, in Handbook of Formal Languages, ed. G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, Springer, 1997, Vol. 3, 339–388.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. Thomas, “Automata on Infinite Objects”, in Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B, ed. J. van Leeuwen, Elsevier, 1990, 135–191.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandru Mateescu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Turku Centre for Computer ScienceTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of BucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations