Representing fiction in SNePS

  • William J. Rapaport
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 437)

Abstract

This paper discusses issues in the representation of fictional entities and the representation of propositions from fiction, using SNePS. It briefly surveys four philosophical ontological theories of fiction and sketches an epistemological theory of fiction (to be implemented in SNePS) using a story operator and rules for allowing propositions to “migrate” into and out of story “spaces”.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5 References

  1. 1.
    Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan, Judith F.; Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; & Zubin, David A. (1986), “Deictic Centers in Narrative: An Interdisciplinary Cognitive-Science Project,” Technical Report 86-20 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Dept. of Computer Science, September 1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1972), “Thinking and the Structure of the World,” Philosophia 4 (1974) 3–40; reprinted in 1975 in Critica 6 (1972) 43–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1975a), “Identity and Sameness,” Philosophia 5: 121–150.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1975b), Thinking and Doing: The Philosophical Foundations of Institutions (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1977), “Perception, Belief, and the Structure of Physical Objects and Consciousness,” Synthèse 35: 285–351.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1979), “Fiction and Reality: Their Fundamental Connections; An Essay on the Ontology of Total Experience,” Poetics 8: 31–62.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1980), “Reference, Reality, and Perceptual Fields,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 53: 763–823.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1989), Thinking, Language and Experience (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewis, David (1978), “Truth in Fiction,” American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 37–46.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martins, João, & Shapiro, Stuart C. (1988), “A Model for Belief Revision,” Artificial Intelligence 35: 25–79.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parsons, Terence (1975), “A Meinongian Analysis of Fictional Objects,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 1: 73–86.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parsons, Terence (1980), Nonexistent Objects (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rapaport, William J. (1976), Intentionality and the Structure of Existence, Ph.D. dissertation (Bloomington: Indiana University Dept. of Philosophy).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rapaport, William J. (1978), “Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox,” Noûs 12: 153–180; errata, Noûs 13 (1979) 125.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rapaport, William J. (1985a), “To Be and Not To Be,” Noûs 19: 255–271.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rapaport, William J. (1985b), “Meinongian Semantics for Propositional Semantic Networks,” Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (University of Chicago) (Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics): 43–48.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rapaport, William J. (1985/1986), “Non-Existent Objects and Epistemological Ontology,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 25/26: 61–95.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Logical Foundations for Belief Representation,” Cognitive Science 10: 371–422.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; Zubin, David A.; Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan, Judith F.; Almeida, Michael J.; Daniels, Joyce H.; Galbraith, Mary M.; Wiebe, Janyce M.; & Yuhan, Albert Hanyong (1989a), “Deictic Centers and the Cognitive Structure of Narrative Comprehension,” Technical Report 89-01 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Dept. of Computer Science, March 1989).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rapaport, William J.; Segal, Erwin M.; Shapiro, Stuart C.; Zubin, David A.; Bruder, Gail A.; Duchan, Judith F.; & Mark, David M. (1989b), “Cognitive and Computer Systems for Understanding Narrative Text,” Technical Report 89-07 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Dept. of Computer Science, August 1989).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scholes, Robert (1968), Elements of Fiction (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shapiro, Stuart C. (1979), “The SNePS Semantic Network Processing System,” in N. V. Findler (ed.), Associative Networks: The Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers (New York: Academic Press): 179–203.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (1987), “SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network,” in N. Cercone & G. McCalla (eds.), The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in the Representation of Knowledge (New York: Springer-Verlag): 262–315; earlier version preprinted as Technical Report No. 85-15 (Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science, 1985); shorter version appeared in Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86, Philadelphia) (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 278–283.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shapiro, Stuart C., & Rapaport, William J. (forthcoming), “Models and Minds: Knowledge Representation for Natural-Language Competence,” in R. Cummins & J. Pollock (eds.), Philosophical AI: Computational Approaches to Reasoning.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Inwagen, Peter (1977), “Creatures of Fiction,” American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 299–308.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wiebe, Janyce M., & Rapaport, William J. (1986), “Representing De Re and De Dicto Belief Reports in Discourse and Narrative,” Proceedings of the IEEE 74: 1405–1413.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • William J. Rapaport
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Center for Cognitive ScienceState University of New York at BuffaloBuffalo

Personalised recommendations