How to draw outerplanar minimum weight triangulations

Extended abstract
  • William Lenhart
  • Giuseppe Liotta
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1027)

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of characterizing those graphs that can be drawn as minimum weight triangulations and answer the question for maximal outerplanar graphs. We provide a complete characterization of minimum weight triangulations of regular polygons by studying the combinatorial properties of their dual trees. We exploit this characterization to devise a linear time (real RAM) algorithm that receives as input a maximal outerplanar graph G and produces as output a straight-line drawing of G that is a minimum weight triangulation of the set of points representing the vertices of G.

References

  1. 1.
    O. Aichholzer, F. Aurenhammer, G. Rote, M. Taschwer. Triangulations Intersect Nicely. Proceedings 11th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, Vancouver, Canada, 1995, pp. 220–229.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.A. Bondy and U.S.R. Murty. Graph Theory with Applications. Elsevier Science, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Di Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia and I.G. Tollis. Algorithms for Automatic Graph Drawing: An Annotated Bibliography. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 4, 1994, pp. 235–282.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.T. Dickerson, S.A. McElfresh, M. Montague. New Algorithms and Empirical Findings on Minimum Weight Triangulations Heuristics. Proceedings 11th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, Vancouver, Canada, 1995, pp. 238–247.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Eades and S. Whitesides. The Realization Problem for Euclidean Minimum Spanning Tree is NP-hard. Proceedings 10th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, Stony Brook NY, USA, 1994, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability-A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.N. Gilbert. New Results in Planar Triangulations. M.Sc. Thesis, Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L.S. Heath and S.V. Pemmaraju. New Results for the Minimum Weight Triangulation Problem. Algorithmica, 12, 1994 pp. 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.M. Keil. Computing a Subgraph of the Minimum Weight Triangulation. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 4, 1994, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. G. Kirkpatrick. A Note on Delaunay and Optimal Triangulations, information Processing Letters, 10, 1980, pp. 127–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.T. Klincsek. Minimal triangulations of Polygonal Domains. Ann. Discrete Math., 9, 1980, pp. 121–123.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Levcopoulos. An Ω(√n) Lower Bound for the Nonoptimality of the Greedy Triangulation. Information Processing Letters, 25, 1987, pp. 247–251.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Levcopoulos and A. Lingas. On Approximation Behavior of the Greedy Triangulation for Convex Polygons. Algorithmica, 2, 1987, pp. 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Lingas. A Linear-Time Heuristic for Minimum Weight Triangulation of Convex Polygons. Proc. 23rd Allerton Conference on Computing, Communication, and Control, Urbana, 1985, pp. 480–485.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Lingas. The Greedy and Delaunay Triangulations are not Bad in the Average Case. Information Processing Letters, 22, 1986, pp. 25–31.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Lingas. A New Heuristic for Minimum Weight Triangulation. SIAM J. Algebraic Discrete Methods, 8, 1987, pp. 646–658.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E.L. Lloyd. On Triangulations of a Set of Points in the Plane. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on the Foundations of Computer Science, Providence, RI, 1977, pp. 228–240.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Manacher, L. Zobrist. Neither the Greedy nor the Delaunay Triangulation of a Planar Point Set Approximates the Optimal Triangulation. Information Processing Letters, 9, 1979, pp. 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Meijer and D. Rappaport. Computing the Minimum Weight Triangulation of a Set of Linearly Ordered Points. Information Processing Letters, 42, 1992, pp. 35–38.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Monma and S. Suri. Transitions in Geometric Minimum Spanning Trees. Proc. 7th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 1991, pp. 239–249.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos, Computational Geometry — an Introduction. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Lenhart
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Liotta
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceWilliams CollegeWilliamstown
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceBrown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations