Advertisement

Diagnostic model-checking for real-time systems

  • Kim G. Laxsen
  • Paul Pettersson
  • Wang Yi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1066)

Abstract

Uppaal is a new tool suit for automatic verification of networks of timed automata. In this paper we describe the diagnostic model-checking feature of Uppaal and illustrates its usefulness through the debugging of (a version of) the Philips Audio-Control Protocol. Together with a graphical interface of Uppaal this diagnostic feature allows for a number of errors to be more easily detected and corrected.

Keywords

Parallel Composition Time Assignment Atomic Proposition Symbolic State Hybrid Automaton 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Alur and D. Dill. Automata for Modelling Real-Time Systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 126(2):183–236, April 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johan Bengtsson, Kim G. Larsen, Fredrik Larsson, Paul Pettersson, and Wang Yi. Uppaal—a Tool Suite for Automatic Verification of Real-Time Systems. In Proc. of the 4th DIMACS Workshop on Verification and Control of Hybrid Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, October 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Bosscher, I. Polak, and F. Vaandrager. Verification of an Audio-Control Protocol. In Proc. of FTRTFT'94, volume 863 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nicolas Halbwachs. Delay Analysis in Synchronous Programs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 697, 1993. In Proc. of CAV'93.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. A. Henzinger, Z. Nicollin, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine. Symbolic Model Checking for Real-Time Systems. In Logic in Computer Science, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pei-Hsin Ho and Howard Wong-Toi. Automated Analysis of an Audio Control Protocol. In Proc. of CAV'95, volume 939 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Hüttel and K. G. Larsen. The use of static constructs in a modal process logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, 363, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Laroussinie and K.G. Larsen. Compositional Model Checking of Real Time Systems. In Proc. of CONCUR'95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Laroussinie and K.G. Larsen. From Timed Automata to Logic — and Back. In Proc. of MFCS'95, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencie, 1995. Also BRICS report series RS-95-2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.G. Larsen, P. Pettersson, and W. Yi. Compositional and Symbolic Model-Checking of Real-Time Systems. To appear in Proc. of the 16th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, December 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mihalis Yannakakis and David Lee. An efficient algorithm for minimizing real-time transition systems. In Proceedings of CAV'93, volume 697 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 210–224, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Yi, Paul Pettersson, and Mats Daniels. Autfomatic Verification of Real-Time Communicating Systems By Constraint-Solving. In Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Formal Description Techniques, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim G. Laxsen
    • 1
  • Paul Pettersson
    • 2
  • Wang Yi
    • 2
  1. 1.Basic Research in Computer Science, Centre of the Danish National Research FoundationAalborg UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Computer SystemsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations