Sum rules in photonuclear physics

  • W. Weise
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 61)

Abstract

In the course of these notes, we have emphasised that the enhancement κ of the integrated total photon-nucleus cross section Σo (mπ) over the classical dipole sum contains integral information about explicit mesonic degrees of freedom in nuclei. The “classical” modes of excitation, like the giant dipole resonance, exhaust roughly one dipole sum, and an equal amount is left to explain, for all but the lightest nuclei, in terms of exchange current phenomena.

Two complementary approaches have been discussed. The dispersion relation sum rule of the GGT type draws global connections of analyticity between exchange currents and physical meson photoproduction, but is incapable of a microscopic description of the underlying mechanisms. The dipole sum rule calculations, on the other hand, are missing all but the low energy (static) aspects of the exchange current phenomenon. There is obviously an important link still missing. We are not yet able to understand, on a microscopic basis, the nature of exchange currents in the transitionregion just below and around the meson production threshold.

Keywords

Giant Dipole Resonance Integrate Cross Section Dipole Operator Charge Oscillation Compton Amplitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Ahrens, H. Borchert, K.H. Czock, H.B. Eppler, H. Gimm, H. Gundrum, M. Krönig, P. Riehn, G. Sita Ram, A. Zieger and B. Ziegler, Nucl. Phys. A 251 (1975) 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Mike and P. Söding, Springer Tracts in Mod. Phys. 59 (1971) 39Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Gell-Mann, M.L. Goldberger and W. Thirring, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.L. Friar, Ann. of Phys. 96 (1976) 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Christillin and M. Rosa-Clot, Nuovo Cim. 28 A (1975) 29Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T.E.O. Ericson, in: Interaction Studies in Nuclei (Mainz) North-Holland (1975), and ref. thereinGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.L. Friar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A.M. Lane and A.Z. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. C 8 (1973) 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. Weise, in: Interaction Studies in Nuclei (Mainz), North-Holland (1975), p. 679Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Arima, G.E. Brown, H. Hyuga and M. Ichimura, Nucl. Phys. A 205 (1973) 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    W.T. Weng, T.T.S. Kuo and G.E. Brown, Phys. Lett. 46B (1973) 329Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M.Fink, M. Gari and H. Hebach, Phys. Lett. 49B (1974) 20Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Hebach, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Fink, M. Gari, H. Hebach and J.G. Zabolitzky, Phys. Lett. 51B (1974) 320Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    W. Weise, Phys. Reports 13C (1974) 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    W. Weise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Weise
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of ErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of RegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations